The Airplane That Looked Fake, But Was 100% Real: XB-70 Valkyrie

The Airplane That Looked Fake, But Was 100% Real: XB-70 Valkyrie

Not What You Think

1 год назад

2,992,096 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@Immortal_BP
@Immortal_BP - 31.10.2024 20:59

man that f104 pilot messed up big time, rip to those 2 pilots

Ответить
@Bob-cx4ze
@Bob-cx4ze - 01.11.2024 19:25

Nice try. Everyone knows that's the battle cruiser from Spaceballs.

Ответить
@aKalishnacough
@aKalishnacough - 02.11.2024 06:15

Humans are cool.

Ответить
@QuincyBecky
@QuincyBecky - 03.11.2024 17:55

Never deny a diagnosis, but do deny the negative verdict that may go with it.

Ответить
@GustavrBert
@GustavrBert - 03.11.2024 18:16

Better to have loved and lost, than to have never loved at all.

Ответить
@bigseanprice
@bigseanprice - 04.11.2024 12:28

Howard "the duck" Hughes designed this!

Ответить
@bigseanprice
@bigseanprice - 04.11.2024 12:30

"it never made it into production." everyone: "drugs."

Ответить
@WilfriedM.Storto
@WilfriedM.Storto - 10.11.2024 21:01

Tolles Design , jedoch die eigentliche Nutzung als Bomber nicht nutzbar war , da diese 6 Triebwerke soviel Treibstoff benötigten das eine zusätzliche Waffen Zuladung Gewichtsmäßig unmöglich war !

Ответить
@kimtilka3406
@kimtilka3406 - 25.11.2024 04:13

This is one bad ass plane

Ответить
@josephsmith6777
@josephsmith6777 - 07.12.2024 02:08

What cool fkn plane .

Ответить
@josephsmith6777
@josephsmith6777 - 07.12.2024 02:10

I wonder if anyone has been able to open this thing up .

Ответить
@dewinjarju8133
@dewinjarju8133 - 22.12.2024 23:31

Ofc always some annoying dumb hands all over the place to be sure too ninja pull or something else stpid ok..

Ответить
@elebeu
@elebeu - 25.12.2024 12:14

I had models of the XB70 and the B58 in the 70s when I was 10 years old.

Ответить
@saprumk4
@saprumk4 - 26.12.2024 22:00

It looks like it´s Naruto running

Ответить
@stanmitchell3375
@stanmitchell3375 - 27.12.2024 01:14

Gary power was checking out the nuclear accident in Russia

Ответить
@DanielAmes-g9j
@DanielAmes-g9j - 27.12.2024 19:00

Valkyrie is pronounced val·kr·ee.

Ответить
@kaalisurfer600
@kaalisurfer600 - 28.12.2024 00:43

what that jet needed is negative centar of gravity and smaller engines

Ответить
@Muffin-ass
@Muffin-ass - 28.12.2024 05:34

Damn he jumped the circuit with a paper clip and fixed the landing gear…. Bravo.

Ответить
@Bit-c-k6h
@Bit-c-k6h - 29.12.2024 03:36

So basically it was a peace of crap

Ответить
@hoonigancarguy
@hoonigancarguy - 29.12.2024 08:42

thats clearly a sukhoi su 33 combine with the concorde but with way too many engines

Ответить
@thomasward4505
@thomasward4505 - 29.12.2024 19:49

I am amazed at how they design that thing and overcame many of the problems in the early 60s or late 50s particularly without the use of modern computers

Ответить
@TheTbet
@TheTbet - 31.12.2024 02:06

If this monstrosity was built by Russians the comment section tone would have been much different

Ответить
@dannydandaniel8040
@dannydandaniel8040 - 31.12.2024 08:15

It looks like a paper airplane

Ответить
@ankursahu269
@ankursahu269 - 31.12.2024 10:53

Please increase your this engine power please sir please

Ответить
@zaphodb9213
@zaphodb9213 - 31.12.2024 22:55

Looked fake, except for the actual footage of it flying. 🤔

Ответить
@donniebaynard8430
@donniebaynard8430 - 01.01.2025 09:24

Photo op = propaganda.

Ответить
@surfernorm6360
@surfernorm6360 - 01.01.2025 12:56

Since I grew up in the heart of the aircraft industry around LAX i got used to seeing lots of unique aircraft. Why would you pick that aircraft to call fake? do you look in the mirror in the morning and think that guy is fake. now the flying wings looked faked to me and specially the round flat plane with only an engine and a rudder that looked like a prank. its boring seeing clickbait now try saying something less stupid next time

Ответить
@arker-n8c
@arker-n8c - 01.01.2025 15:16

What a wasted of tax money!

Ответить
@nicholask.brannon9419
@nicholask.brannon9419 - 01.01.2025 20:22

They should try something that size or larger again since we have better technology.

Ответить
@parkpunk2
@parkpunk2 - 02.01.2025 06:46

Plane from the early '60s that looks like it won't even be conceived of for another 40 years.

Ответить
@davidhaynes3126
@davidhaynes3126 - 02.01.2025 07:09

I saw the Valkyrie XB 70 at the National Air Museum in Dayton.
Saw the B58 Hustler too. Amazing Museum. Well worth the trip.

Ответить
@leeverink32
@leeverink32 - 03.01.2025 02:58

if thats true wy did the space shuttle not have a flat nose or lose paint that thing did mach 8

Ответить
@jeffcomstock3164
@jeffcomstock3164 - 03.01.2025 07:21

The most beautiful looking aircraft that never saw production.

Ответить
@TlD-dg6ug
@TlD-dg6ug - 03.01.2025 08:16

The U.S.A. used shell companies to build the shell

Ответить
@jesser9134
@jesser9134 - 04.01.2025 08:10

Fukin photo shoots...

Ответить
@nippon19
@nippon19 - 04.01.2025 20:05

I like SO MUCH X-planes, even if they didn't give birth to an actual plane, they often have "look of future" which is really cool !

Ответить
@fuckyougoogle1148
@fuckyougoogle1148 - 05.01.2025 04:08

I remember walking around and under the plane while it was parked outside at the original museum at Wright-Patterson in 1970. So cool then and now. I remember reading about moving it to the new museum at Wright Field down the road and how the whole town of Fairborn and suburbs showed up to watch. I haven't been there since 71 but I would like to take a trip back to see it again. So many amazing exhibits to see.

Ответить
@NAVYABHAN
@NAVYABHAN - 07.01.2025 03:56

Now that I can compare the practical aspects of an aircraft, many of ours are very complicated, not practical and very expensive to operate and maintain.

Ответить
@chrislee176
@chrislee176 - 07.01.2025 04:10

How many Americans did the government impoverish to make this white elephant?

Ответить
@NikitaNikitaNikita
@NikitaNikitaNikita - 07.01.2025 04:15

I didnt even know that US was thoose project too. if you watch videos about project like that there will be only mention about Concode and TU-144
Oh I understood its because this is a military aircraft but Concorde and 144 civilian.

Ответить
@Marconius-SPQR
@Marconius-SPQR - 08.01.2025 22:36

The F-104 Starfighter was so unstable it should have been called
"The Ex-wife"

Ответить
@Chrish1981
@Chrish1981 - 10.01.2025 19:36

The only criticism is it could probably use a liiiiittle more power...... 😂

Ответить
@jackbailey7037
@jackbailey7037 - 19.01.2025 12:23

Narrated by Bela Lugosi

Ответить
@oscarwalton1188
@oscarwalton1188 - 08.02.2025 02:08

Ah the concordski😅

Ответить
@aquahoodjd
@aquahoodjd - 12.02.2025 09:04

Wonder if that airplane could be redesigned to have three of those engines become outer atmosphere engines and could it fly into space and back? With modern materials and components as well as coatings Do we already have a design for a space plane that's very large and has a large capacity? Does it just need to be tweaked with different engines put in it?

Ответить
@aquahoodjd
@aquahoodjd - 12.02.2025 09:06

The Service ceiling was 77,0000 ft not far from the Karmen line! We already have the plans so with modern manufacturing modern components and modern codings etc with new engines and new engine designs It would be a low cost engineering switch
It already had to be super resistant to atmosphere due to the fact they could fly at 77,000 ft.

Ответить
@jordanmntungwa3311
@jordanmntungwa3311 - 01.03.2025 19:10

bring this plane back with Modern Technology. Humans make one mistake and give up on an idea completely

Ответить
@chronocommander007
@chronocommander007 - 02.03.2025 07:55

If this is AI narration, why doesn't the AI know how to pronounce Valkyrie in English? Narrator's version sounds more German. If it's a human narrator, why didn't he research the correct pronunciation of the subject at hand? "Val-kree" is correct.

Ответить