Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.7 lens review

Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.7 lens review

Christopher Frost

3 дня назад

15,930 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@pixbypatric
@pixbypatric - 18.12.2024 16:10

I trust Christopher s reviews.

Ответить
@Blairumscarum
@Blairumscarum - 18.12.2024 16:12

I'd be really interested to see the new Samyang 35mm 1.4 Prima lens reviewed

Ответить
@lionheart4424
@lionheart4424 - 18.12.2024 16:19

I hope you also review this lens' direct competitor, the updated TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 mark II.
I was expecting a little more from this lens, seems adequate for 24MP-26MP.

Ответить
@PaulStregevsky
@PaulStregevsky - 18.12.2024 16:43

This lens will kill off the XC 35mm f/2.

Ответить
@MrBaptista
@MrBaptista - 18.12.2024 16:47

Thanks for the review. I would like to see a comparison to the Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4

Ответить
@typeology8266
@typeology8266 - 18.12.2024 17:18

Please put the PRO quality into small lens. Nowadays Fujifilm is not a budget choice anymore. Many care about quality and aesthetics over rest of the things and we don't mind adding few hundreds more for the aperture ring, metal build and weather sealing.

Please if any company wise enough, stop producing cheap plastic one. And there're some focal length more in need like 18mmf2(for better IQ and AF), 27mmf2.8(for better AF, much prefer to have an F2 if possible), 40or45mm, 56or75mm(would like a f2 or f2.8 quality linear motor pancake lens).

Ответить
@EarthbendR
@EarthbendR - 18.12.2024 17:26

Would have used your link to buy if it were full frame 😢😢😢. Awesome video!

Ответить
@DarkAvenger1234
@DarkAvenger1234 - 18.12.2024 17:30

Interesting to see ArthurR channel said this was “significantly sharper” than the Sony 35 oss 1.8. But it seems it’s just averagely sharp in the world of sharpness? Maybe we have come a really long way since 2012.

Ответить
@martinpickard5818
@martinpickard5818 - 18.12.2024 17:37

I’ll keep my Fuji 35 f1.4…..

Ответить
@kuroexmachina
@kuroexmachina - 18.12.2024 17:38

letsgo finally a match for the 56mm f1.7

Ответить
@JaySilva88
@JaySilva88 - 18.12.2024 17:38

This has to be the best bang for buck lens of 2024.

Ответить
@erik6678
@erik6678 - 18.12.2024 17:38

This one or the ttartisan 35mm mark ii?

Ответить
@afferist
@afferist - 18.12.2024 17:39

The reason I'm back on the Sony system - is these third-party lenses!
It's time for Sony to update their old CROP lenses or make new ones

Ответить
@pascalhibon7928
@pascalhibon7928 - 18.12.2024 17:48

Wauw, another great Viltrox lens. They produce some very interesting lenses at crazy prices. Impressed!

Ответить
@grumpyrocker
@grumpyrocker - 18.12.2024 17:52

Fuji does have a very good rival this lens in terms of function and price - the superb XC35mm f/2.

Ответить
@alexisrivero6790
@alexisrivero6790 - 18.12.2024 17:54

Compared to the meike 33 1.4

Ответить
@zo_ren
@zo_ren - 18.12.2024 18:00

Please do a TTArtisan 35mm f1.8 II review!

Ответить
@bleaujos9927
@bleaujos9927 - 18.12.2024 18:25

170 pounds, it’s too heavy for me…

Ответить
@nickscott8488
@nickscott8488 - 18.12.2024 18:47

Averagely sharp wide open is a pity, was hoping to buy this lens in Janruary but youve made me have second thoughts Chris.

Ответить
@DigiDriftZone
@DigiDriftZone - 18.12.2024 19:07

So it's around 53mm f/2.6 in terms of full frame focal length, depth of field and light gathering, pretty compelling option.

Ответить
@OneHourPhotos
@OneHourPhotos - 18.12.2024 19:16

By the sounds of it, you’ve also got that horrible winter bug that’s going around.

Ответить
@carlosreyesf19
@carlosreyesf19 - 18.12.2024 19:21

I wish this lens existed for the Canon R mount

Ответить
@yourtallness
@yourtallness - 18.12.2024 19:45

Decent option for the Nikon Zfc for which there is no native 35mm option.

Ответить
@fractalcore7691
@fractalcore7691 - 18.12.2024 19:46

Fujifilm X has the XC 35 2.0 for about the same price, but for Nikon Z this is a great option.
I was hoping for better sharpness, but like the overall quality and there will probably be discounts (just got the Viltrox 56 1.7 for 135€ and really enjoying it).

Ответить
@gilbertshih4625
@gilbertshih4625 - 18.12.2024 20:04

I was hoping these 3rd party interesting lenses were with aperture ring ! X mount needs those imperfect small lenses so much !

Ответить
@Tardsmat
@Tardsmat - 18.12.2024 20:18

I'm in the market for a 50mm equivalent apsc lens and there's been so many good options coming out recently. This, the yongnuo 33mm 1,4 and there's a new ttartisan 35mm 1.8 too, though idk how good that one is yet.

Ответить
@GeorgiBonchev87
@GeorgiBonchev87 - 18.12.2024 22:19

Wow, to be honest, I think the bokeh is specacular! Definitely a lens with character, even if not clinically perfect.

Ответить
@AWAShowme
@AWAShowme - 18.12.2024 23:38

Good stuff from Viltrox. I think they would also do well with a robust manual focus fast aperture lens. Thanks for the video.

Ответить
@attenia
@attenia - 19.12.2024 01:15

I really wanna see a review of the TTArtisan 500mm f6.3 made by you. Everyone else always seems fishy or doesn‘t do it with the quality you do :/

I hope you‘re gonna make it happen at some point :D

Ответить
@Nookbart
@Nookbart - 19.12.2024 03:44

Many thanks for the review. I compared it with your review of the XF/XC 35mm F2 and I have to say that the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 beats the XF/XC35mm F2 in almost every aspect. Very nice.

Ответить
@nicolasnatanael8112
@nicolasnatanael8112 - 19.12.2024 03:44

Now the big question: this vs XC 35mm f2?

Ответить
@trym2121
@trym2121 - 19.12.2024 04:24

Whoa, this one actually have a pop. Surprised to see that in viltrox. Viltrox usually have flat rendering.

I think viltrox 1.4 have too much negative features (LoCA, boring bokeh) that they have to make 1.7 version which is very excellent compared to 1.4

Ответить
@muratbasc8302
@muratbasc8302 - 19.12.2024 12:51

Hi Chris, it would be a good idea to touch how to upgrade firmware of those lenses. You always mention about this spec on your videos but many of us don't know how to do it. Thanks for all those good work 💪🏻👏🏻

Ответить
@SyedNizamudeen
@SyedNizamudeen - 19.12.2024 15:11

I'm looking for a 35mm (50mm full frame eq) FL for my fuji X-T3. I shoot stills only. Planning to use it for couple portraits or family portraits with wide aperture. Image quality / character is the most important. Very much inclined towards the xf 35mm 1.4. But, I feel it's slightly on the costlier side for a hobby.

I have the fuji xf 23mm f2 and xf 56mm 1.2 and love them both.

I don't care about AF. I can manually focus. Should I go for this new Viltrox Air or look at other manual focus lens by other 3rd parties that offers better image quality in this price range??

Ответить
@Mister_Islander
@Mister_Islander - 19.12.2024 17:37

Torn between this or the meike 33mm f1.4 ? Help please.

Ответить
@imaldric9457
@imaldric9457 - 19.12.2024 18:40

I want to see a comparison with the sigma 30mm 1.4

Ответить
@David-ee9zg
@David-ee9zg - 19.12.2024 22:27

Looks the same as a Samyang to me. Doesn't Christopher get bored doing these?

Ответить
@旅行攝
@旅行攝 - 20.12.2024 04:26

I'm waiting for the 24mm1.7 lens

Ответить
@MarKuzvicky
@MarKuzvicky - 20.12.2024 07:05

For which mounts is this available?

Ответить
@viltroxofficial
@viltroxofficial - 20.12.2024 11:00

Appreciate your unbiased review and recommendation again, Chris. It's our goal to have more beginners enjoy content creation at a lower threshold with our products. We will keep working on it

Ответить
@Mebtaku
@Mebtaku - 20.12.2024 14:35

I was waiting for this lens being released since first rumours- already have 56/1.7 and I was really hoping for same image quality. Bit disappointed here with f1.7 sharpness 🤔 i never questioned your reviews but considering other reviewers reporting no IQ issues at 1.7 is it possible that it was bit weaker copy? I highly doubt Viltrox would send not double tested copy for review but somehow I just can’t accept this mediocre wide open image quality 😀 I wanted this lens because i really hoped for a just wider copy of 56 and it seems like it’s not the case here

Ответить
@mylucksmiles
@mylucksmiles - 20.12.2024 14:53

I often wonder how a chart test really works ? Depth of field on a flat surface? Any chance you could explain how we can trust such an image , a narrow depth of field could change the image results . In the real world the imagine has depth . My reason for asking is down to depth of field real world. The depth when focused is dealing with variables. I do find this part of the review most interesting. I would find the real world photos along side the charts of a helpful guide. Thank you for reading this request .

Ответить
@NickErickson
@NickErickson - 20.12.2024 16:24

The images from this lenses are popping off of my screen. Beautiful

Ответить
@NoahLivingston
@NoahLivingston - 20.12.2024 17:19

Chris Niccolls whatever, what I want is the 23mm in this series!

Ответить
@n22pdf
@n22pdf - 20.12.2024 19:09

Just ordered on for my 6400 😊 great review.. Pete

Ответить
@allaboutky451
@allaboutky451 - 21.12.2024 04:21

Hope you could compare or review the Ttartisan 35mm f1.8 mark ii

Ответить
@outalingamcrap9366
@outalingamcrap9366 - 21.12.2024 11:33

Chris, please don't forget the TTArtisans 35mm f1.8 mark 2

Ответить
@euogaldino
@euogaldino - 21.12.2024 12:37

Sigma 30mm 1.4 or Viltrox 35mm 1.7?

What lens I should buy for A6700?

Ответить
@DesoloZantas
@DesoloZantas - 21.12.2024 14:18

I hope Sigma would make a 16-70mm 2.8 or 17-70mm 2.8

Ответить