Комментарии:
So I am the first one to comment. This shows the lack of interest for this important topic. The problem will get worse, once this tech is dominated by foreign firms (a current trend), the political lobby will die out. The US public is dumbing down into a grass hopper mentality. What will happen if the gas price rise up to $5/gallon? The US society will be totally wrong footed and immobilized.
ОтветитьHow about the electrical system?
ОтветитьDudes! Get a grip! Combined cycle gas-fired power plants, nuclear power plants, geothermal power plants, and hydropower plants are all so much better than coal.
ОтветитьThe most efficience of power plant in the world..
ОтветитьWait Dude for fussion powr plant no more pollution......
ОтветитьNow in progress research in Cadarach....
ОтветитьThe fate of this plant isn't because of Obama-era rules, its because of the economics of shale gas
ОтветитьTime for Thorium Power Plants.
Ответитьwhat does it matter when China is building 20 to 40 a year I say go for it... plus the scr today clean the co2 to less than 15 % make America great again!!!!!
ОтветитьThank God we elected Trump. This technology should replace all current conventional coal power plant in the States.
Ответитьit is better than other coal plants, but that's not saying much. don't waste money on new coal plants. we can afford clean air, just don't use so much electricity.
ОтветитьTime for some West Virginia coal.
ОтветитьPeople don't understand that these plants emit about 99.99999% steam into the atmosphere. They are extremely clean.
Ответитьcan you give us numbers PSI, temps, efficiencies, stack gas percents not spin
ОтветитьA. "scrubbers remove all the polutants from the flue gas". That's utter BS and he knows it. Reduced emissions is great, but CO2 is put out in thousands of tons per day.
B. A 15% efficiency increase is great, but that's from 33% to maybe 39% before transmission losses.
Coal is cheap, that's the only thing going for it. Natural gas is a bridge fuel, and this plant will likely convert to gas long before it's obsolete.
This is actually the first of many like it.
ОтветитьConvert to Biomass.
ОтветитьThe rules have changed today! Thank you President Trump! (funny how auto-fill suggested Obama when I was typing this) Boo youtoob 👎
ОтветитьEverybody cries about being green, yet they drive crew cab unloaded trucks to work with 1 person and then cries about the electric bill the same day. I am all for America energy independence i think to put a hole natural resource to waist is insanity. If coal can be this clean and provide jobs in the process then it should always produce at least some of the energy for our grid. The more options we have the stronger are nation is.
ОтветитьAll I got from this was to stop renewable energy, without coal Bill's will double and triple, and the govt changes their mind all time. I feel like this was more subliminal than educational. Sorry, your coal plant may be shut down in the future. But good for you making it efficient.
ОтветитьWow my dream ,i am part of this industry
ОтветитьNever heard of the Ultra SC. Gonna look into it. We have 3 SC units in Entergy Mississippi and they were built from 58 to 81 as base load units. Two burned natural gas and high content solder #2 oil and did so economical and efficiently as a base load units. The older has been very dependable and was designed to bite coal slurs as well as the other two but never has. If I ever get that direction I am going to try to contact someone so the manager can possibly get me a visitors pass. I have seen coal operations in eastern Arkansas because I attended continuing training there several times👍🇺🇸🤙😃
ОтветитьWho will pay to keep the toxic coal ash from poisoning the water after this plant is retired?
ОтветитьThe answer to the 21 st century boilers
ОтветитьGood riddance, dirty coal!
ОтветитьDemocrats whats to use only Fossil fuel 's Because they have connections and they get kick backs.
ОтветитьPG&E bill for Feb 2021 $840 to basic use 2700 sq ft.
ОтветитьEfficiency of this unit?
ОтветитьThe information in this video about electricity costs are simply false. The last six years have proven this is nothing more than BS.
ОтветитьSolid video
ОтветитьAlstom generators
ОтветитьI just don’t understand why America is retiring coal plants while China and India continue to build them.
ОтветитьTell this to that stupid bitch (Greta Thronborgh - Whatever her name is) Bringing change to the world is not about just quacking on the microphone.... Go and Study something you slut!!!
ОтветитьMining Coal is better than mining Lithium. You still need coke to reduce metals
ОтветитьAmerican Electric Power is a for-profit company that pays dividends to thousands of stock market investors. If they weren't sending all that money to "investors" they could lower the electric bills for people. The best option is for people to push for locally owned electric co-ops and publicly owned utilities. Then they should work toward weatherizing homes and businesses to make them more energy efficient. Once demand has dropped, it is easier for local smart grids to produce their own energy without relying on massive power plants built by Wall Street investors and banks who siphon off all the excess profits to pay for their mansions and yachts.
ОтветитьSure shut down coal and make more profit greed rules the world.
China was building two a week.
The only issue I see is that the “virtue signaling” politicians can’t wag their “green finger” at it and say it’s a good thing no matter if it is or not. They would prefer to outsource our pollution to other countries so they can say that their policies are clean and green then spoon feed this manure to the un and uneducated and uninformed voters and say, “look at what good our policy has done. We have gotten rid of dirty kilowatts.”
ОтветитьCoal is one of the most expensive energy sources on earth
ОтветитьWhat a concept! A path to the middleclass through the trades. But no, wind turbines, solar panels, and 'biomass' are the bleak future we face of rolling blackouts , privation, and third world living standard. Coal and NG can be a bridge to technologies that provide a real baseload. Fusion will be here in another 30 years, so we can build nukes. But the greenies want their latte infused Teslas, having no clue as to what makes the magical force that powers their rare earth rich cars with resources from China and on the backs of Congolese children. But hey, who cares as long as I get my enviro street cred.
ОтветитьJohn W. Turk facility in Arkansas is listed at 0.6 GW in Wikipedia and uses low BTU Powder River Basin coal that requires 50% more coal by mass than high BTU Appalachian bituminous coal. There were groups espousing as being environmental that were fighting the new plant's greenhouse gas emissions which are mute as greenhouse gas behavior because earth's greenhouse effect is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor and can't have its overall effect changed.
These environmental groups are pushing fraud and likely knowingly so. They succeeded in needlessly increasing the cost of electricity for people much less fortunate than themselves by forcing the purchase of expensive wind generated electricity. Ironically one of the environmental groups was the National Audubon Society where wind turbines are major killers of endangered large birds. The overall appearance is these environmental groups used fighting the plant as a means to enrich themselves.
Main KPI how much coal for 1kWh power generation? Can reach to 270g for 1kWh?
ОтветитьFuel recycling systems mutate or die the town over 30 counties everyone died from something burnt in the power plant
Ответить