Creating a research proposal using ChatGPT in 5 minutes.Results checked for plagiarism later.

Amazing, Amazing and most informative

Thank you so much, and please make more videos...

It makes it but the problem is the citations and references are all fake.

Unfortunately, all the references are not correct 😔

There is only a problem... must citations are invented...

For those worried about fake references, I think this is where the juice lies: you don't wanna just rely on the AI to do the work for you. You need to actually know what you are dealing with, and it comes down to this: ChatGPT just becomes a tool to expedite your workflow, but you still need to do the hard work of reading.

Please create a video where you make an MA thesis

Ii tried ..it worked well but References were fake.. And chatgpt also produces the text not more then 530 words

Sometimes ChatGpt generate non existent citations.

I paused and read the intro. Its really bad. Its not actually a research proposal. It just describes the concepts. It did impress me how it related two different concepts at one point. But its pretty rudimentary still.

Once such algorithms have access to the bigger scientific databases, the dream of many will be achieved. What will come next? To me, it's funny to see some of my colleagues anxious about gpt, as if fake and/or inconsistent science projects and papers with doubtful literature reviews, weak methodology, and wrong or even not reproducible results (to don't say fake) never existed. In my opinion, in a very optimistic scenario, chatgpt will may cause more troubles than solutions to the people looking to live as researchers more easily. And in a pessimistic, and more plausible scenario, the competent A.I. users, not necessarily the most competent in their expertise area, may help even more the trusting crisis on science due to misleading or sensationalist results in all areas of science which will reinforce as if with steroids, the fake news industry in social media.

In my opinion, chat gpt is Like an assistant. It wrote a research paper with fake citations and literature review. Anyone who knows his research area can take it as a skeleton, add and throw unnecessary lines. Add the required necessary llines. Completely relying on AI is not good at all. At the end AI can't replace human knowledge and experience.

Just to give you some clarifications. It will be a dumb and stupid idea to think you can submit the work created by AI for your research proposal. You can only use it to gain ideas of how to proceed. Thinking that you can use the AI as shortcuts to doing your work is akin to academic suicide. Universities are developing programs to track research proposals generated through chatGPT. My university has developed one already. A doctoral candidate of mine submitted the chapter two of her proposal three days ago and I ran the AI plagiarism check and a 95% match came up. She basically submitted the work created by chatGPT as part of her dissertation proposal. Of course, that's the end of her dissertation journey. She'll be expelled from the university before the end of this semester. So, you should beware that universities are catching up to chatGPT and it will be foolish to think you can submit your work created by chatGPT. It's supposed to be used as a guide in doing the real work, not as a shortcut to getting a degree.

This is something revolutionary for researchers like us. We should use it wisely. Not just copy past blindly.

Great content guys. Keep posting 👍👍👍

Amazing tutorial video. Thanks for sharing knowledge.

I'm fascinated by the ChatGPT phenomenon, and I'm particularly interested both in how my students might use this technology and how I can use it to expedite my own work. As such, I was eager to give this a try.

Using the prompts in this tutorial as a template, I was able to generate a proposal and a literature review within about 20 minutes. Superficially, both documents were well-organized and mechanically sound. Moreover, ChatGPT generated a list of very promising references, some of which seemed to anticipate my research question by a couple of years.

Scratching beneath the surface, though, a few things stood out. First, the resulting literature review didn't really answer the prompt. Rather, it talked all around it, utterly failing to tie together the threads I was tugging at. That's not terribly surprising. I deliberately chose a research question I was reasonably sure no one had asked before. Much as a novice student might, ChatGPT summarized both sides of the issue I raised and declared that the two were similar, but provided no argument to support that assertion. Fair enough. If I tweaked the prompts I used more, I would probably get something closer to the mark.

What I was more interested in for my own work was the reference list. Some of the articles listed were so directly on point that I feared I'd been scooped. Many others were tantalizing. Unfortunately, the most exciting articles were all AI hallucinations. Even that, though, was informative from a teaching perspective.

First, the journals listed were all authentic, peer-reviewed journals. Moreover, the imagined titles all seemed like something the listed journal might publish.

Second, the journal and issue information was accurate in terms of what the target journal published in the listed year. Moreover, while the page numbers were meaningless since the cited article didn't actually exist, the page numbers fell within the page limits of the issue listed.

Third, not every reference was a hallucination. Quite a few were genuine.

In all, then, as an instructor, you'd have to go to some effort to ensure your students' references were all valid. Requiring ChatGPT to provide DOIs seemed to cut down on fake articles, though I haven't done enough triage to verify if that's always the case.

So, this was an interesting exercise. I'm both eager and scared to see how quickly this technology improves. It is definitely changing the landscape of teaching and scholarship.

I noticed that the citations are sometimes fake (or at least can not be found on pubmed/google scholar, etc.) do you know how to fix this issue ??

One important question: Is it academically ethical to do that ?

Fantastic! Thanks for sharing.

how to search for references?

Whats the website? I can't go through with this page🙃

That is not working for the simple reason that chatGPT can't give you real references, it makes it up.

Chatgpt gives wrong information

Makes stuff up and is a terrible approach. Do the work in the first place and write your own proposal. What chat gpt is good at is brainstorming ideas

Please how can I contact you I've got so many questions

can this useful will not show ai plagiarism or detector

Please help me by sharin the link with kind regard

At first I am thankful to you,I want to ask you a favour. There’s no plagiarism in my research but how can I cancel AI from my research

Is this chat gpt 4? Or are u uaing chat gpt 3.5

I use Undetectable AI, humanizing content, effortlessly bypassing detectors. Enhance writing seamlessly with simplicity.

As a ninja PhD. I hope i can 😊

I prefer using the Undetectable AI cuz it can actually humanize my context to avoid getting detected from ai detectors

But now turni5in also detect ai tool how to remove that.

Excellent. Can I talk to you about more info

i was expecting to see the plagiarism result using turnitin with AI check turned on...

good
can you help me to do proposal and project

You need to do your reading. JENNY AI is better.

Thank you so much Sir ❤🎉

Is plagerism checked used by most universities?