Комментарии:
when youre on the opposite end of chomsky hedges and sachs you know youve gone full tard
ОтветитьGreat, let’s ignore the fact that all the countries mentioned by Jeffrey Sachs had applied for admission to NATO. Why? Perhaps all of these countries wanted protection from Russian aggression. Should they have denied them because Putin might get upset? They are a defensive body. So what if Victoria Nuland had a time table for NATO membership. Most executives speculate about future decisions. It’s absurd to keep arguing this.
ОтветитьLooking forward to your next interview with Jeffrey Sachs.
ОтветитьThe Nuland phone call was not a “plan for the post yanukovych government” but for a compromise government that would involve some people from the opposition while yanukovych remained in power. Events obviously outpaced these plans for a “compromise” government.
ОтветитьThe Clinton Administration was a total disaster and gave birth to many calamitous events down the road. Deregulating Wall St. gave us 2008 financial collapse, reckless NATO expansion gave us Cold War 2.0, Free Trade gave us the de-industrialization of America and turned China into a world power. Attacking the poor with Welfare reform and sanctions on Iraq that killed 500,000 Iraqi children. I could go on but I can't think of one thing the Clintons did that made Americans better off.
ОтветитьNATO expansion is the only thing that has kept Putin's genocidal hands off of Poland and the other former Warsaw Pact nations.
ОтветитьNATO expansion, NATO expansion, NATO expansion, ad infinitum
Get over it, well still have to crush fascist Russia whether Nuland lives rent free in your heads or not.
The same neocons that lied us into the Iraq war are now pursuing the Ukraine war.They have a hidden plan to Weaken Russia and to help Israel Destroy Syria. THese people care nothing of those killed American or otherwise. Pure evil.
ОтветитьI want Jeffery Sachs for president !
ОтветитьCurse you, Robert--these tidbit teasers; just give us the goods, sir! :)
Ответить"I have information from a secret journalist that proves a Pro-Russian conspiracy theory" he said
ОтветитьNATO long planned to expand? Yes. Fine. Putin planned to expand Russia's sphere of influence? Yes. Fine. But Putin invaded and annexed to achieve his plans. Not fine.
Is there any good reason for NATO to include ever more nations? How about that NATO nations have not gone to war with each other in 70+ years. Would NATO have accepted Russia eventually if Russia wanted in bad enough? What would have been the down side to NATO of that?
That B£ob = E£ Pu£po.
ОтветитьSolid GOLD
ОтветитьCut the Fed gov by 70%.
ОтветитьFirst the Deep State, now the Deep Blob. One thing's for sure, we're in Deep Sheet.
ОтветитьGreat discussion.
ОтветитьPutin was behind the latest NATO expansion...inadvertently.
ОтветитьOne strange fact about ALL NATO countries. THEY'VE NEVER BEEN INVADED BY RUSSIA. Yeah. I know. Who'd a thunk it??
ОтветитьLol 🎉😂 What will they talk about in the darn "mainstream" (not mainstream at all anymore) media? Oh I know, I know! Transgender kids! Lol 😂🎉😂🎉
ОтветитьFree countries can join whatever alliances they want. Who honestly cares, besides Russia is clearly to weak to stop NATO expansion anyways.
Ответить