Does Ciri From Witcher 4 Look Masculine?

Yeah it's not so much how she looks but they're turning her into yet another bland boring ugly angry girl boss. And I'm willing to bet Witcher 4 will unceremoniously kill off Geralt just like Neil Cuckman did with Joel in TLoU2.

Dev likes men pretending to be women, so it's not surprising

Its not even that shes not good looking. Its the fact that shes not as feminine as before and that this is the reason of a political agenda.

When ME2 was in development SuicideGirls (porn site with tattooed girls) was popular. At the time there was a market for sexy alternative girls.

i will never buy witcher 4.

Imma be real. A lot of what you said doesn't apply to witcher or cd projekt red in general. They did cyberpunk not long ago, and witcher 3, duh, and there wasn't any bullshit ugly women or feminine men or any of that. I agree this phenomenon is a plague on west games, yes, its a big issue, however not to this company, and it be really dumb if it they'd start doing that kind of nonsense. But what I have to say is that this is a trailer, I'm sure her looks will be better later down the line. There's a problem, however, main issue is that definitely she's older, and also she's a witcher, so not showing cleavage, donno man, there's another issue, Ciri even in the books and the old games was more boyish, more rough and tumble, so I dont see at all what your opinion holds, especially now, should we be concerned and tell them not to go on a barf worthy path of nonsense that concorde and other disasters went at, yes, but not really because I doubt they'd do that. As I said, they have fantastic games that didn't do any of those gargle things so it be really stupid if they'd do that now. On topic, the thing about Triss, you said it yourself, her and other sorceress use their magic to keep their beauty, Ciri isn't a sorceress. Could there be more on the design, sure, now, when it comes to showing assets, there's an issue in the middle, you see, she's fighting monsters, so armor that covers you up is not bad, its too early however to completely judge there though, yes it is a fantasy world so I think just like the previous game there will be plethora of armors that are more modest or more revealing. I think a very important thing in your videos should be observe the actual video and their legacies and how it goes from there, because as I said, they don't seem to be affected by bullshit like concorde, and while it is a concern that you don't want to see that, I think putting it more politely rather than condemning and judging them by the first trailer, just tossing them with all the shit that was released that was a pile a dogshit isnt really fair.

Watched the trailer with an unpolitical friend who loved the first 3 games and he is not getting this. He has said he has a lot of games and shows to watch already. He is getting the Elden Ring DLC to play together though.

We are talking about a dude that thinks transwomen are women...instead of just admitting he is gay.

Wow Dev is wrong, what a shocker. Compared to TW3, her face has been elongated, her chin and jaw enlarged. Possibly her nose is a bit larger, and her mouth looks a bit off.

An expensive shit is still shit.

Someone comment in another YT video about Ciri's face model and the trailer. Here i share it :

"- She does seem to get triggered both times the gods are mentioned, which is kind of weird because both her and Geralt used to take a more sarcastic and ironic approach to such themes.
- When it comes to characters in the trailer it's predictably feminist. You have 2 women. One is an edgy girl boss, and the other is an oppressed victim of tradition and religion. You have 2 men. One is weak and passive, and the other is being a dick.
- Ciri is using Witcher techniques which implies she underwent the Trial. There's no way Geralt and Yen would let her do that because the mortality rate is 70%.
- If she survived the Trial that means she's sterile now. So the Elder Blood dies with her? Speaking of which, she's not using her powers in the trailer during life or death situations, which implies that she lost them. But those same powers are what would theoretically help her undergo the Trial successfully. So does she have them still or not? If yes, why isn't she using them? If no, then how did the Trial work when she is both a woman and an adult?
- Some say Ciri became a witcher in W3. She didn't. She was called a "witcheress" by Dandelion and Geralt sent her on the Path, yes. But she never mutated. She was a witcher in name only.
- Some say that Ciri lost her EB powers during the White Frost undertaking. If that were so Geralt wouldn't send her on the Path. Without Elder Blood and without mutations Ciri is just a human warrior. As such she stands no chance against high level monsters.

If I were to initially brainstorm, I'd guess that, in the spirit of leftist redistribution of power, Ciri sacrifices her EB powers in order to create a new Trial of the Grasses process which is safe (and probably superior since she's a woman and all). So she starts the new school of the lynx which creates the new generation of progressive witchers whose true strength is their diversity. I hope I'm wrong on this because if it's true then I jokingly predicted it some years ago. I basically said how Alzur's methods will be surpassed by some feminist metaphor, how they'll create a superior way of witcher creation, where women could mutate as well, and how they'll even be more powerful than their traditional counterparts."


And i agree of this opinion

Every day iam more and more motivated to ignore any new game release because no matter how good Is source material left will bend it in some form of monstrosity.

I won t spend my money for this sh!t.

they are blurring the lines between genders intentionally
they are doing it because (BlackRock told us) they want to change behavior
Don't pay for propaganda.

She looks a lot like Gerald did in Witcher 1 game

When I saw the trailer my first impresion was that they gender swapped Geralt.

Dev has fallen to Slaanesh.

These people can almost always be defeated in a few questions: “Why was the design changed?” “If the original design was fine or “didn’t matter” why did they go out of their way to change it?” “If it’s not a big deal why waste your time defending it?” “Who is the target audience for this change?”

The front view is fine, the angled one is what makes her look like a goblin. In particular the pronounced nasolabial fold and sunken shape caused by a lack of fat in the cheeks contrasting with the prominent cheekbones, I'd say. Plus the eyes, but from what little I know of her isn't that supposed to be a feature of hers anyway?

As for the beauty argument itself, frankly I have more respect for the gooners at this point than the normies on this. At least they are letting the lizard brain take over fully. Beauty for beauty's sake is about as manipulative as it gets, appealing to the lowest common denominator, and it's nothing short of baffling to see people realize that and applaud it anyway.

Dev might just actually like men.

She looks like Marilyn Manson.

Everybody said Dragon Age would sell despite DEI garbage because the "brand is so strong". It didn't work, it has never worked, and yet CD Project think they can do it because the "brand is so strong".

If i play as a chick I want to have her easy on the eyes as I play as her. I don't wanna be 2nd guessing if it's gender bent with a 50% chance of roping itself halfway through the story

Im sorry. I do not think Citi looks bad at all in Witcher 4.

That's not to say that this game is gonna be riddled with DEI feminist crap. Ofcourse it's gonna be and it will be bad for that.

But I can't get behind the complaints that ciri looks masculine because she doesn't at least not to me.

I'm not trusting a gay man on the femininity or lack there of of a nominally 25? year old female character in peak physical condition that also happens to have a vast amount of unique magical potential.
That's like asking a modern "fashion designer" to make something appealing and timeless when all they can do is drape trash on and around some emaciated wretch. Meanwhile the average clothing/underwear catalogue/business catwalk show has no such issues with knowing what their audience (M or F) would be interested in nor in finding vast numbers of physically fit and healthy people to dress up and use as a model for their clothing goods and corporate branding be it sandals & sarongs, strappy heels & split-dresses or slippers and fuzzy PJs.

Ciri in that trailer looks sallow, and well on her way to menopause. The jawline is elongated like the gyrocopter pilot in mad max, her expression is slack-jawed gormless and the attitude far to naive for someone raised/trained by a multiple witchers, witches and world-experienced travelers/traders/adventurers/nobility/spies/upstarts/rogues/outcasts.

She doesn't look masculine, she just looks so full of hate and anger.

They know that Ciri can't stand on her own so they trying to make female Gerald, this should've been a spinoff but brand recognition wouldn't be there otherwise.
And with a modern continuation of beloved franchise also comes excuse to make only man group into all invited, trilogy haven't done that because it's a lore that supposed to mean something but CDPR thinks only women can have places for themselves so that checks out.

Its people like melinie mac yellow flash nerderonic geeks and gamers ninna infinity and many like them support this ESG then they have a souk that it wasn't what they are expecteding then they blame the right

Does she look mannish? No.
Is she pretty? Also No.

Don't worry, someone on nexus mods will mod Ciri........ then Nexus mods will ban the mod.

There is a reason behind the "masculine aura". It's to pander to the 🏳‍⚧. A lot of nu-devs are MtF. They removed the breast-slider from any create-a-character for this reason. Their motto is: "If I can't pass, then cis women shouldn't either."

I hate what leftists have done to games, but I think this is a pretty big stretch. I don't find her ugly at all 🤷🏻‍♂️

Now commence with calling me a retarded leftist lol

SFO is a leftist in denial, along with Act Man, not shocked at his shit takes anymore.

It's INSANE the level of male heterosexuality shaming there is in western culture from ALL sides. Also we wouldn't be complaining so much if there wasn't ACTUALLY an attempt to punish heterosexual men in TV/Movies/Games/Ads etc. Great example that comes off the top of my head I remember seeing a lot as a kid, was attractive women in bikinis on liquor stores advertising a brand. They're ALL gone, at least the ones I've see. I'm confident that didn't effect any sells at all, but it's just nice to see. Not all men are high level men that have women falling at their feet begging to be with them, so the most the average men will most likely ever experience is just SEEING attractive women. And that's all they really needed knowing the grim reality of their chances with women, it's why sex sells because because they know most men aren't getting laid lol.

It's just more demoralization tactics to break men into conformity of some trained dog that acts like how they want us to. A little eye candy is a threat to BOTH sides and it's annoying.

SFO likes Women2.0, not sure anyone should take his opinion seriously.

She looks more like she got a facelift to me than outright ugly.

What has happened to Dev? I’ve been listening to him for 10 years & in the last year he’s lost me, he thinks he’s still the same but he’s had some of the worst takes I’ve ever seen from him. I’ve mostly stopped listening to his videos now, I used to watch every vid & was a subscriber on twitch for over 2 years, it was only $5 per month, but still.

I think that would explain why she survived witcher juice

She look old to me
like they just copy Geralt backstory pasted it on her

i think making such a big stink about how Ciri looks is gonna hurt the fight against DEI in the long run. Like all the diff staff at cd project red, sbi hiring and retcon of the lore and such are legit but harping so much on her looks while they went for more realistic models is gonna make people reconsider the legitimacy if what we're trying to change in the gaming industry

Dev needs to touch grass.

In the Witcher books, Geralt is described as being freakish and the first Witcher game is pretty accurate to his appearance, but CDPR changed him to be handsome in the sequels. I don’t know why they forget the benefits of doing that

In no world does Witcher 4 Ciri look like a man to me. I don't know wtf you guys are smoking and I hate what they did to the Horizon girl. This just isn't it. Did she look younger and hotter in Witcher 3? Yes. But this isn't the cliff jump you guys are making it out to be. Maybe you Europeans just aren't as used to masculine looking women as we are so everything looks like a troll to you? Idk.

They fucking used late stage Courtney Love as a model

Short Fat Otaku has terrible taste.

I'm a woman. And I'm straight. If I'm playing as a female character, I like to play as a pretty female character.

Kratos as a Californian Democrat? Didn't we see him "be better" in Ragnorok?

of course he doesn't, when he looks in the mirror he thinks he's looking at the most beautiful girl in the world