Patent Basics (1) - Understanding a Claim

Extremely well done. Are you for hire?

Thanks for the nice comment - I am not for hire right now; I get a lot of questions from friends about patents and thought id put together a channel with my own videos and links to others that I thought were good. All the best!

Excellent, I wish I could afford to hire you.

To the maker of this video, are there any attorneys, such as yourself, that you can recommend to have draft and submit a utility patent?

Thanks a lot 

helpful ! ! !

Great information! This is exactly the type of language and information I was seeking to confirm questions about my particular patent. Your video presentation was concise and to the point. I was actually excited watching the presentation because of the knowledge you brought forth appeared like this video was tailored for me specifically. Lol. Well done, Sir... Your work is well appreciated. Thank you. 

What about products that are identical? For example an Under Armour shirt, now NiKe, Adidas, and everyone else has an under shirt. Aren't those patented? That's the part that is most confusing. In your example the band could not go on the wrist, but a shirt has to be put on, so how can Nike and Adidas make the same exact shirt as under Armour?

Love the videos though thank you!

Informative video!
Am i right to say, there is no infringement when patent B only has 1 claim less than patent A where patent B was filed later than patent A since all but 1 claim is identical or similar?

Massive help. the only help I have actually got of the internet so far, the rest is utter bullshit. Thank you.

Thank you sir. Very informative.

Am i right that just 1 independent claim infringed results in infringement and its not required that EVERY independent claim is infringed to result in an infringement?

Good stuff.

I'm in the process of writing my patent with the pure intention of licensing it out to an existing industry. Surely the simpler and
"overall covering" a claim is the more watertight the claim is too. I mean the more one attempts details the more one restricts oneself to a particular principle of operation of the device making it easy for anyone to copy and claim something similar and simply use other details. I mean, take a car for example, one would simply describe a car as a functional device powering 4 wheels etc and not stress the use of gasoline as a propulsion method, where then anyone else then can infringe claiming they are using Diesel, and therefore not infringing (as an extremely crude example of the principle) ??

What happens if the USPTO Examiner does not read, write or speak English?

Thumbs UP :-)

can i patent my kids bevaise of government kidnapping

What happens if you forget to add claim 1 in your patent infringement lawsuit? Should you add all claims in a lawsuit?

How is a claim related to an embodiment?

very help thank you, i was usprised that someone could patent a stuff toy with treat inside but once i read it again, they put a " flag" comprising a treat pocket, it changes it all, not surprising they put it in the end.

best of the best

very slow presentation.

Beautiful

USPTO is one of the government allowed scams to bulk inventors out of there money. You'll see.

Are you open to reviewing a patent and a ipr case? I'd be willing hire you.

Why do Americans pronounce "patent" wrongly?

Very helpful

The OBAMA care 2014. & My thuong mai dien tu dien toan dam may is cau ket Microsoft’s amazing twet mobile yahoo Verizon Facebook account bank HQ INC development cau ket FPT OTO camudivi Zing me vng vn China alibaba group Hacks website Facebook account bank hack the world bank trade max China groups also of trade group hacks the Dmca Wipo trips technology watch Nobel game also 2014

Bless you Sir

Very well done series of videos.
God Bless you. They have helped out and guided me for years.

Amazing video!

Hi, I have some basic question and it's appreciated that you or someone could answer it, suppose I invent a drawer - furniture, 1, should I write mounting the screws process, the drawer will use screw but common screws only, but it did need screws, 2, infringer could make two or three drawer using the same way, then what claims should I draft, IT CAN BE USED FOR SEVERAL DRAWERS??? thank you so much.

Intervention quand il le faut

Thank you . This was really valuable

How to know if something I want invented it already patented