Комментарии:
That was a great witness.....for the prosecution! 😅
ОтветитьSo nice of this defense witness to prove the prosecution’s case for them.
Ответить👌👏
ОтветитьShows the cover up and corruption of the Canton and Massachusetts police along with the judge. LALLY knew last trial the tail light was not in the same condition and never showed it to the cop. Lilly knowingly with held exculpusory evidence
ОтветитьShe can’t take accountability it prob was an accident but her and her attorneys had to come up with a conspiracy theory 😒
ОтветитьTHE JODIE ARIAS OF CANTON. THE VIRGINIA FERTITAS( NJ) OF CANTON. ALL ARE GUILTY. ALL CLAIMED INNOCENCE. ALL WENT ON TV CRIME SHOWS SAYING THEY WERE INNOCENT. GEE, GUESS THEY ARE ONE IN THE SAME. KILLERS AND ALCOHOLICS. HMMM.
ОтветитьOmg if u can’t see by now, second trial this was not from a car crash or collision, but by those in the Albert’s house, u never watched or listened to the evidence. This could happen to anyone of our family members ourselves and our friends. Canton is full of Corruption just look at the coverup murder of that beautiful mom to be😢It was coverup but the same witnesses in this trial and the first
ОтветитьBetween the Medical Examiner, Snow Plow Driver, and Expert Reconstructionist, the Police Sargeant from other district, the medical doctor's testimony -- she did not kill him. There is no explanation that the prosecution has presented how his cell phone was under his body, how he received the gash on back of head, black & blue eyes, not to mention dog bites and scratches. NO injuries to his lower extremities. Brennan has NOT proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that she is guilty. Something sinister happened between the driveway, garage, basement of that house and JOK deserves justice.😢
ОтветитьAny lay person knows johns arm injuries are from a dog...also lawyer Lee put arm injury in chatgpt and asked him what was cause of injury and chatgpt said animal bites and scratches..
ОтветитьAlso, Monday the medical arcca doctor will say that from the results of Dr Wolfe testing, the arm would have sustained breaking and bruising at said forcesand speed, not simply scratches.
ОтветитьThis whole trial/case is a Rorschach test. Everyone has an opinion of the ink blots. I don’t think any opinion has greater weight than the opposing. No jury will ever come to an unanimous decision.
Ответить@Court TV I want to commend you for your very kind and generous words and support for Colby Ryan during Brandon's hearing. It truly touched me and a lot of others. 🙏
ОтветитьNOT GUILTY. Detective Barros saw one piece missing from tail light.
ОтветитьSaved the prosecution $50.000 in proving there case 😂😂😂😂
ОтветитьShe’s gonna be found guilty maybe not of all charges but she’s going to be found guilty. There’s more than opinion supporting her being guilty like phone data and car data ect
ОтветитьCrash Daddy is a beautiful man. His eyes and eyebrows are perfect. The suit and tie are fab. Fun watching in such an unnecessary re-trail.
ОтветитьSo did they test the taillight for JOK's DNA?
ОтветитьInstead of assuming that all the damage to the taillight was from hitting JOK, did they consider that she could've hit JOK AND then the next morning hit his vehicle as she was heading back to the crime scene? It could've been a combination of both!
ОтветитьCorruption
ОтветитьWolfe needs to put a reign on his wife!!! She is part of FKR and her husband is in the middle of litigation on this case. That tells me all I need to know about Wolfe.
ОтветитьIf after those demonstrations from ARCCA you still think John O'Keefe was struck by an SUV you're totally insane. I mean, those demonstrations literally show you what would happen, and those injuries and marks are not from a taillight. At all. Now google dog attack bite marks. The CorruptionWealth is COOKED.
ОтветитьThere was no dog DNA on JOK arm period!
ОтветитьThis guy destroyed the prosecutions case !!!
ОтветитьThanks for the video showing exactly how KR hit John. I enjoyed watching Brennan's expert cross. He led the defense witness thru each point, the arm breaking the tail light, pieces shattering small enough to enter the weave of the shirt, the lower body remaining untouched by the SUV, and the large debris field. This with Karen's incriminating interviews, case closed.
ОтветитьDestroyed on cross-examination...
ОтветитьSoooo where's the cross examination and Brennen? 😮
ОтветитьSo many people are commenting that this proves she’s guilty. I just don’t see how. Did I miss something? He said it would have to be over 30mph to generate enough force to do that level of damage. Even if it were possible, that doesn’t prove that it happened. Bottom line is that we still have no idea what actually happened that night. Only JO knew, and sadly he can’t tell us. Nothing either side has presented thus far makes it any clearer. I don’t think we’ll ever know definitively, and you can’t find someone guilty without definitive proof, even if it’s just circumstantial.
ОтветитьThe defense witness helped the prosecution case
ОтветитьHe is very intelligent and very handsome. No wonder he has four kids.
ОтветитьI can't believe people would
Believe Karen's guilty. Who wouldn't ask themselves, could I hit him? Did I do this? I am sure she was in shock. Also, who hasn't been this mad at their partner thinking he was cheating? The judge and police are so biased. They arrested her within 16 hours of his death.
Psssst…. She’s GUILTY….
ОтветитьProctor screwed up when he busted the diffusers because they were still intact after ARCCA's testing with the dummy. Also there weren't 47 pieces missing at the 24 mph in this testing. The 47 pieces were found 2 weeks AFTER this happened. Major cover up happened.
ОтветитьI could have discribed a billiards shot and explained the delta, acceleration etc better and the jury probably would have understood.
ОтветитьSo we are to believe a Degree'd police officer, didn't know where the front door was so ambled down the road, stood in the road like a harnessed dummy, with his arm outstretched just waiting to aim it at KR car, as she gunned into him, oh wait did Dr W say gunned or slowly hit John? Johns trained instincts , drunk or not, would make him move, the minute he thought she might be gunning for him. Then, he miraculously pirouette's, hits the ground and flies through the air and lands perfectly on his back, how? The landing in the hard surface and cracking his head, would have released most of the energy and momentum, the ground is not a trampoline. So Really??
ОтветитьHank is a rude narcissist with conflict seeing he is losing his case despite the judge helping him. That us why he continuesly object and scream.
ОтветитьIf the Defense doesn't believe there was a collision, then why are they focusing on the collision? Karen said in the docuseries she knows what happened to John.....tell the Jury, Karen.
ОтветитьWow I could listen to the first guy forever. His wife is lucky. ❤
ОтветитьThe F*ds finished their investigation into this case a few months ago. There was no corruption, including Proctor. There is no cover-up.
ОтветитьThe ex parte communication violation between the Judge and the prosecutor requires The Massachusetts Judicial oversite committee and the Legislature to start impeach investigation proceedings!
ОтветитьI spent years trying to manifest my dream life, but it never seemed to work. I tried so many methods, yet still felt stuck. Then my friend and I heard about a book called Manifest and Receive by Eva on a podcast. I was hesitant at first, but after reading just a few chapters, I realized how much I’d been missing 😭 Her approach is unlike anything I’ve ever tried. It’s not just about thinking positive — it’s about aligning with real-world actions that actually bring your desires into reality. The way Eva explains manifestation through quantum physics is EVERYTHING. Truly understanding the science will change your entire reality. I'm living proof😭✨
Ответитьgreat vid!
Ответить