Комментарии:
this is a good example of socratic questioning. Actors were actually convincing and very well done. More views needed; i will recommend.
ОтветитьThis was excellent! It really gives a clinician a picture of how things should be done. Thank you for sharing! :) I have subscribed.
ОтветитьThis is almost the ‘yes man theory’
Ответить1. The event
2. Identify the underlining assumptions
3. Question the assumption
4. Conclusion or new emerging prognosis
5. Compare and contrast the new prognosis/accommodation (Piaget 1957) with the old assimilation.
6. A new paradigm.
And this is how I understood the dialogue.
Amazing video!
ОтветитьBad example. The conversation is not balanced enough. The philosopher is pulling the conversation towards his own knowledge, but he should know that he also don’t know the true knowledge. They should both seek the path to knowledge, and not one guy dictating the conversation in a inhuman manner. This judgement is based on my assumptions.
ОтветитьThe interviewee should just address this head on. Tell your mother-in-law that she makes you feel uncomfortable when she doesn’t wave back to you while sitting on her front porch.🤪
ОтветитьProblem:
Assumptions are predictions made by the brain based on previous (traumatic) experience that is often stored and acted upon unconciously, which is why they can´t be clearly articulated in this kind of questioning.
Try using the socratic method on whether we live on a spinning ball that water magically sticks to! Have fun!
ОтветитьPoor audio
Ответитьclinicians should stop doing this. You cannot ask these types of questions without skin in the game..superior questioning an inferior
ОтветитьI mean I think it's pretty safe to assume not acknowledging someone can lead anyone to think they're not liked. Acknowledgement is proof of an established relationship.
To not be acknowledged by someone in public, can lead to someone believing that relationship isn't as established as they thought.
Or it could've been just as simple as they didn't see it or mistaken identity. But the premise is assuming the person DID see them and CHOSE not to Acknowledge them. I think people can know the difference between someone that isn't pay attention and someone that's ignoring them.
I can see this being a form of gaslighting to be honest.
ОтветитьAssumptions tend to have this kind of problem, we tend to then go to a worse case scenario in our minds. We fill dialog in for the other person to reinforce our confirmation bias, things that the other person literally did not say.
Our imagination can be wonderful, or terrible, thing depending what state of mind we are in.
🕊
Ответитьcbt
ОтветитьThank you so much for this amazing example! I'm wondering how to use this with clients who get stuck in thoughts of "I should be doing more, I'm not good enough, or I'm unlovable " which ends up contributing to the cycle of anxiety and depression?
ОтветитьI talked to the guy. He doesn't like him
Ответитьgreat video!
ОтветитьZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz yawn zzzzzzzzzzz
ОтветитьThanks. This was very enriching.
ОтветитьThis is great as we are learning about socratic dialogue at home. Please make more of this kind of video. Could you also please move the mic closer? I have hard time hearing. Thank you.
ОтветитьThis conversation should have just discussed their biceps.
Ответить"Any other hypotheses that you can think of as to why might not like you?"
"I ** his wife."
Great video. Hopefully yall put out more content in the future. 🤙🤙🤙
ОтветитьBest example I’ve seen
ОтветитьAm I ill to think it's okay if some people do not like us and some like us and that not everyone is supposed to like us just the same way that we do not like everyone?? Is there any problem with me then? seriously I am asking. I do not even care much if I know someone does not like me especially if I know I have not given them any terrible reason for not liking me, then I am okay with being not liked and I think everyone's entitled to their likes/dislikes opinions etc. I do not like some either and that's fine.
ОтветитьAs a therapist in training, this seems alot easier than I thought it was. I'm wondering "how much of the therapist is in this protocol?"
ОтветитьStranger look at me he may be mocking me
Ответить1.Questions for clarification (Ask the client about a certain event and their point of view about the event)
2. Questions that Probe Assumptions (Here you will ask the client the details about their assumptions-you dig more)
3. Evidences of the assumption (Ask the client why she or he assumed that perspective, the reason of her or his assumptions)
4. Other Viewpoints or Perspectives (You encourage the client to look at various perspectives other than the initial assumption)
5.Questions that probe consequences (Ask the client what is the possible results of her or his initial assumption)
6. Questions about the Questions (Ask the client how she or he felt about the questions being asked by the therapist)