"Galaxies Actually Existed Before The Big Bang" James Webb Telescope Saw 15 Strange Galaxies beyond.

"Galaxies Actually Existed Before The Big Bang" James Webb Telescope Saw 15 Strange Galaxies beyond.

Cosmos Prodigy

55 лет назад

164,368 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@katon4444
@katon4444 - 14.06.2025 03:57

Is it real info?

Ответить
@org-corp
@org-corp - 14.06.2025 05:13

Wouldn't the very concept or mechanics of time would be something different that early in the universe

Ответить
@Coltara
@Coltara - 14.06.2025 10:28

Checkmate atheists

Ответить
@starsandnightvision
@starsandnightvision - 14.06.2025 11:40

There is no such thing as an early Universe, there's just...the Universe.

Ответить
@NiToNi2002
@NiToNi2002 - 14.06.2025 13:37

This is old stuff (2022-2023) recycled as clickbait. Since then a flood of follow-up spectroscopy, deeper imaging and new theoretical work has clarified why the JWST seems to glimpse “too-big, too-old” galaxies without actually overturning the 13.8-billion-year age of the Universe.

Galaxies that at first glance looked older than the Universe turn out - after careful spectroscopy and better modelling - to be younger, less massive, but far more numerous and vigorously star-forming than we had expected. The age of the Universe is safe.

What JWST is really rewriting is the early chapter on how fast gas turned into stars, how quickly dust and metals appeared, and how early black holes and bars shaped young galaxies. This is exciting but doesn’t mean our current cosmology needs wholesale replacement or that the Big Bang is challenged.

Ответить
@BabarizamDK
@BabarizamDK - 14.06.2025 20:23

This is not something new. Twister theory is around since 1960s. CBM proved that long ago. We can use the word "Confirming" James Webb simply keep confirming what we already knew.

Ответить
@berhtrahmngregor6418
@berhtrahmngregor6418 - 14.06.2025 23:00

Is it possible that electro-magnetism is playing a major role in forming galaxies since everything in this era was tightly packed? The magnetism, of all those particles interacting and heating up, would force particles to cling more. I'm sure gravity played a role as well once black holes began to form, but perhaps all the material of countless galaxies would create a lot of magnetism.

Ответить
@jamesdavidson3259
@jamesdavidson3259 - 14.06.2025 23:36

common sense told me the big bang doesn't make sense!

Ответить
@Nethertar
@Nethertar - 14.06.2025 23:42

Man those comments are one step away from an insane asylum.

Ответить
@davidcasagrande267
@davidcasagrande267 - 15.06.2025 01:31

What your really trying to say is that , all these hot shot scientists , from all their hot shot universities , with all their hot shot degrees on the wall , really don't know CRAP !!!!!!!!

Ответить
@BasedInTheory
@BasedInTheory - 15.06.2025 08:59

The new elevenlabs is so good.

Ответить
@koblongata
@koblongata - 15.06.2025 23:39

it actually makes more sense and less mysterious than before

Ответить
@Jackowl1
@Jackowl1 - 16.06.2025 00:28

Never believed the Big Bang theory even as a child. It was convenient and dumb

Ответить
@alejandrocurado5134
@alejandrocurado5134 - 16.06.2025 02:24

Peer review my ass. Big bang passed all types of peer reviews and it's now being unveiled as a sham

Ответить
@warrenallsopp
@warrenallsopp - 16.06.2025 02:32

It's a shame that the MAGA regime will soon ban science altogether in America & arrest it's scientists for practicing black magic.

Ответить
@bobbinschott
@bobbinschott - 16.06.2025 05:54

the entire universe its just one big nebula, from a very huge explosion

Ответить
@mickeyhead9770
@mickeyhead9770 - 16.06.2025 06:05

Now how in the heck does anyone know the exact age of the universe? It’s all speculation.

Ответить
@weakw1ll
@weakw1ll - 16.06.2025 16:36

The galaxy got wormholed out there

Ответить
@juhanilaasonen4212
@juhanilaasonen4212 - 17.06.2025 06:07

Little bang😂

Ответить
@Jagg-l1m
@Jagg-l1m - 17.06.2025 18:09

Only God knows 😜

Ответить
@PranitSuman
@PranitSuman - 17.06.2025 19:57

What if our current model and these things are both correct, I think we do not understand how long even a few million years are,

Ответить
@nomadsojourner
@nomadsojourner - 17.06.2025 21:19

Oooops

Ответить
@falkenherz1708
@falkenherz1708 - 17.06.2025 22:35

I only recently learned that the big bang was no bang. It was just a change in properties of something which was already there, an endless universe switched from dense/opaque to transparent.

Ответить
@uriellyshoj
@uriellyshoj - 17.06.2025 23:09

Very well made video. Without a complete understanding on the big bang theory and why it is so widely believed, i have always thought it a strange theory. It is still a theory since we don´t have concrete proof (as with a lot of space science), but almost everything about the age of formations in the universe and expanding of the universe rely on this one theory. I am totally not qualified to sat anything against many of these theories, but i have a theory that our understanding of the birth of the universe may be wrong.

Ответить
@justanotheryoutubechannel3102
@justanotheryoutubechannel3102 - 18.06.2025 00:34

I have ALWAYS argued against the "something out of nothing magical unicorn black hole that isn't a black hole beginning of EVERYTHING" big bang theory! It DOESN'T effing make sense no matter WHAT fancy math you invent to prop up your BUSTED ASSUMPTIONS!!!!

I'm laughing at EVERY big bang moron that ever threw their BUSTED MATH at me with snide condescending self assured stupidity!!!

The universe has ALWAYS existed and the "big fling" is merely an effing LOCAL EVENT!

Ответить
@Official_Mr_Lex
@Official_Mr_Lex - 18.06.2025 08:06

Can we please do away with the baked in captions? Definitely have captions for those who need it and can actually read them fast enough. Lol

Ответить
@scottwarren4998
@scottwarren4998 - 18.06.2025 19:45

@Cosmos Prodigy Why can't the Web telescope see to the so called start of the big bang? WHY? just zoom in a little bit more, you are so close to the so called start.

Ответить
@Orozco_PNW
@Orozco_PNW - 18.06.2025 22:22

I don’t think the universe ‘started’ but came as a result of some infinitesimally rare conditions that yielded a fountain of light/matter that ‘most’ of the objects we currently see in our spatial vicinity. There are probably explosions that happen beyond our visible horizon, with subatomic particles that governed by slightly different laws of physics. Some yielding stable matter like we have, others that don’t.

Ответить
@disinclinedacquiesce
@disinclinedacquiesce - 18.06.2025 22:27

Fascinating! I'm excited to understand how science learns from this and what more there is to discover.

Ответить
@lu5445
@lu5445 - 19.06.2025 03:09

What we call the “universe” is sounding more and more like it’s the next size up after a galaxy and not “everything in space “

Ответить
@Wezeard
@Wezeard - 19.06.2025 17:47

We all knewed we just didn't had that confirmation

Ответить
@Penny-w8n
@Penny-w8n - 19.06.2025 22:48

OK, then assuming there was a big bang at all. It wasn’t the begging of everything, obviously. So what or who did it ?

Ответить
@absolutezero6640
@absolutezero6640 - 20.06.2025 08:38

stop plagiarizing videos

Ответить
@Abc-tx4zr
@Abc-tx4zr - 20.06.2025 09:46

what if the nature of light isnt the culprit?

Ответить
@TheHolyEagle33
@TheHolyEagle33 - 20.06.2025 12:50

fractal universe everything is an illusion until bserved.

Ответить
@fattahosman
@fattahosman - 21.06.2025 07:32

Big bang never existed but god was

Ответить
@marcjones1139
@marcjones1139 - 21.06.2025 21:39

Why is it that scientists are never wrong until they are proven wrong then don't ever say so. It's just a case of "we know more now". 😅

Ответить
@StanPolnicky
@StanPolnicky - 22.06.2025 04:14

To me that seems like no surprise at all. Just common sense.

Ответить
@josecortez1268
@josecortez1268 - 22.06.2025 04:15

I believe that we are feeling like the enthusiasts in the 20's when Edwin Hubble discovered that our galaxy is not, here wall, the intere universe.
p.s.sorry my english is not my birth language

Ответить
@StanPolnicky
@StanPolnicky - 22.06.2025 04:25

A micro spec to a bigger picture. Loke a giant black hole that includes even a billion times that the hubble can see that is in action a billion times slower than the smaller black holes we know of. Or patallel universes that involve einstins theiries where infinitely thin becomes infitely large where every parallel universe is infinitely thin relative to the one you occupy. To all of the others.

Ответить
@martian-sunset
@martian-sunset - 22.06.2025 14:26

So, basically, the Big Bang wasn't the beginning. It was just an event. Perhaps these large, formed early galaxies, which existed before the event, are what remain from after that event.

Ответить
@KrawnKam
@KrawnKam - 22.06.2025 14:29

Sorry but what Webb finds will never make sense until they let go of the Big Bang.

Ответить
@jonjordan2747
@jonjordan2747 - 22.06.2025 21:03

It's just a theory at the moment, stop acting like children!

Ответить
@SoCalSurfer69
@SoCalSurfer69 - 23.06.2025 06:57

There was no big bang. 😮 I know to my core there was no big bang.

Ответить
@danalain4126
@danalain4126 - 23.06.2025 09:51

The Big Bang theory is wrong.

Ответить
@UAFNAHLVIUser-e6i5q
@UAFNAHLVIUser-e6i5q - 07.06.2025 10:47

Thank you for posting; very interesting content. Its a relief to hear a real human and not an AI voice and your presentation is down to earth.

Ответить