The next day, when Paula went to tell Sally which painting she had selected and to pick it up, Sally declined to go through with the sale. Sally accused Paula of deceit, saying it was only when she learned that the money for the purchase had come from Museum that she realized that the painting would no longer be held privately. Sally tendered to Paula a certified check, which she had signed and drawn from her bank account, refunding the $200,000. In the notation line of the check, Sally had written, "Refund on first of Monay Pond series."
Paula refused to accept the check and insisted on getting the painting. She explained that she had not disclosed her principal's identity because she was bound by confidentiality and that, unless she could deliver the painting to Museum, her budding career as an art acquisition agent was over. Sally told Paula, "That's too bad. Our contract wasn't in writing, so you can't force me to sell the painting. Besides, you deceived me about why you wanted to buy it."
Can Paula obtain specific performance of Sally's agreement to sell Paula the painting? Discuss.
Тэги:
#Caselaw #Tort