Cohen v. California Summary | quimbee.com

Cohen v. California Summary | quimbee.com

Quimbee

7 лет назад

39,577 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@ShamankingZuty
@ShamankingZuty - 12.10.2024 18:15

Of course this would happen in California. What a piece of shit state.

Ответить
@haroldgobbel8339
@haroldgobbel8339 - 10.06.2024 17:02

I understand the needs of the First Amendment for all of us. And I, too, am happy that it is there for all of us. However, societal values are also important - even paramount, even though they change through the years. Justice Harlan was absolutely wrong in saying a person simply doesn't have to look. That is absurd. You certainly can turn away AFTER you see it, but why in the world would you turn away from anything that you've never seen? It's too late. You have already seen it. Now, you can turn away. But now, you've already been offended. It is a surprise and a shock to see a sign in the back of a station wagon window with this word, just as much (perhaps even more, since you may be stuck behind that station wagon for a while) as it is to have a person rounding the corner wearing a top displaying the word. The "F" word is NOT a word for public use. Nor is it a word for use in mixed company. Certainly, not for use around MY children (referencing the station wagon and even the Sonic restaurant). All of our children will have to fight off corruption and vulgarity soon enough. Parents really don't need anyone's help in escorting their children to the world of vulgarity. In Boston (when I lived there), you couldn't turn your car radio up so loud that the person in the next car couldn't even think. I thought that law was great. Sure, words are cute. Words are descriptive. Words are ways to an expression that otherwise couldn't be expressed. But there is also respect for others that somehow has been lost. Mr. White's use of the "F" word was not a free exchange of ideas. It was a provocation.

Ответить
@isaacrios8392
@isaacrios8392 - 07.06.2024 22:45

this was on the 2024 ap gov exam lol

Ответить
@actanonverba3041
@actanonverba3041 - 24.07.2022 08:03

Harlan is right but for the wrong reasons. It is a shame that this decision has been extended so far as to prohibit laws that cause direct damage to other people if they conceal a vaguely political message (Snyder v. Phelps).

Ответить
@Toshineko
@Toshineko - 11.03.2022 20:55

Just like the ''Eff the draft'' t shirt is protected speech, so too is the ''Eff the police'' t shirt. Isn't that right, officers?

Ответить
@Cjephunneh
@Cjephunneh - 30.09.2021 16:48

As long as tyrants exist, Free speech limits will continue to be controversial.

Ответить
@giordanobruno1333
@giordanobruno1333 - 10.03.2021 02:06

Try pulling a camera like a GoPro or your cell phone camera in a courthouse, courtroom or even out on the steps and you risk assault from law enforcement.

Go ahead. Try to express your free speech in the most public building in your community. Just pull out a camera. Don’t say a word. Just record. Good luck.

Ответить
@mlgtactics9911
@mlgtactics9911 - 14.02.2021 10:47

No ad revenue for you potty mouth

Ответить
@philipcearley1992
@philipcearley1992 - 24.12.2020 05:03

It's a freedom of speech, but keep it low in front of the children.

Ответить
@mactastic144
@mactastic144 - 12.05.2019 07:05

"The free exchange of ideas, even offensively expressed ideas, is a virtue worthy of First Amendment protection." - Justice Harlan
These words are a blessing to my ears. People don't realize the importance of this decision.

Ответить
@HistoryCollectorsForum
@HistoryCollectorsForum - 10.03.2019 14:18

Case law that is still relevant today.

Ответить
@MrPapageorgio
@MrPapageorgio - 03.02.2019 21:38

Example Westboro Baptist Church

Ответить
@TheJosherrs
@TheJosherrs - 12.09.2018 20:23

Lovely video

Ответить
@ItmeFatima
@ItmeFatima - 23.01.2018 03:50

hahaahahaha!

Ответить