Комментарии:
Where is the physical proof? So far all I’ve seen is conjecture and hypothesis. The rubber has to meet the road. Let’s see the performance evidence, not some “slick” video possibilities and dreams.
ОтветитьWhy can't we just slow the hell down before reentry? Then we wouldn't have all that friction and heat in the first place.
ОтветитьShow me the video of it working I believe this is a shot at destroying Musk all I saw was a small space shuttle that we know won't do what we need done In the future and that has to ride in a rocket probably built by Musk it might be useful to take small loads to a space station but it ain't no where close to what you are going to need to explore space. It's a pickup truck compared to Musk's Train
ОтветитьDo you believe everything NASA just talks about this how much money has been given to them .
DOGE
Did NASA Learn Nothing from the Shuttles??
ОтветитьIt’s only a dream.
Ответитьmusk is already about to deploy the next generation of heat shield, the stainless steel sweating tiles. please ditch your AI voice and scripting.
ОтветитьOoo, you gave Elone credits for understanding thermal dynamics. How nice of you .When is your next circle jerk 😀
ОтветитьNASA tried the space plane and that didn't last.
ОтветитьX-37B makes re-entry look easy.
ОтветитьWhen i think of musk its more, oligarchic nazi and wanker, not fearless
Ответитьthe narrative explains that when dream chaser re-enters earth atmosphere the vehicle is subjected to temperatures of up to 3000 degrees Fah ;,whilst keeping the interior a cool 350 degrees Fahrenheit!!! man that's bloody hot for a human
ОтветитьPlease can we have metric measurements in the description.
ОтветитьDeport Musk now!
ОтветитьSo, this is a advert for DreamChaser...
ОтветитьFa gord sakes use metric 🙄
ОтветитьThe original design work was done by the Russians and should be acknowledged
ОтветитьThis is the correct progress to follow on from the Apollo program and space shuttle. SpaceX has taken the wrong approach in reproducing 1960’s technology which has taken way longer than the Saturn V rockets which had 6 successful lunar landings in less time than its taken for starship to reach earths orbit let alone continually crashing and blowing up. The Saturn V rocket was only 30ft shorter than starship plus booster and never had an actual launch failure over 60 years ago.
ОтветитьPowerPoint presentation 😊
ОтветитьThe wait penalty would have been worth it to the station and recovery system symbol to the B1 and fb-111
ОтветитьThis carries a fraction of the load of Starship, and is only designed for low earth orbit. Starship is designed to leave earth orbit with massive payloads. It’s a good design for what it’s supposed to do though.
ОтветитьI feel like our space programs are so severely lacking compared to the rest of our technology like what we’ve done with ai and computers. We need a serious space and aviation revolution. It feels like we’re so far behind. We should at least have planes capable of both atmospheric and space travel without rockets.
ОтветитьAll this talk will it work , can it fly at a decent cost.
ОтветитьThe Earth is 2/3 ocean. That means you can land on 2/3 of the earth instead of a single Runway somewhere on hard ground. It is also simpler to splash down then to attempt a Runway Landing with a space vehicle.
ОтветитьFearless approach to failure? Elon Musk? LOL. The guy crying on TV, because no one likes him🥵🥵🥵? He can't even replace Starlink satellites in orbit. This is no more than a Tesla Propaganda piece.
ОтветитьThis video sounds more like an ad for Sierra space than anything else. They just simply made everything smaller there by requiring less parts. And as far as they're lifting body design goes I studied that in high school back in the late 70s so there is nothing new here.
ОтветитьI wouldn’t trust anything that Elon says or does.
ОтветитьI must say those Musk critics really sound Low I.Q. Period, the end.
ОтветитьElon Musk is a lot smarter than NASA engineers as they couldn’t get the astronauts off the space station, but his rocket could. This dream chaser is not going to work for the same reason the space shuttle didn’t work. There is also a reason why Elon Musk Starship design doesn’t use only tiles as a heat shield. They are too fragile. Starship uses a metallic heat shield with tiles sandwiched in between.
ОтветитьOver budget, years late and unproven. I'll believe it when it happens.
Ответитьtiny ship :)
ОтветитьTurgid ai slop
ОтветитьDump spacex, boycott x,starlink,tesla .
ОтветитьThe Muskrat is just wasting billions. We will never get to Mars. The Muskrat is only able to get to Low Earth Orbit. Hes a con man. You should have seen that by now.
ОтветитьFlies like a ceramic defaectorium?
ОтветитьDreamchaser = classified missions. You will never convince the naysayers here.😊
ОтветитьYup..........Ctap.........no..........I did not misspell.........Spayce shatttle........😮
ОтветитьWhen I think of this functional moron that puts my country and my multi-racial democracy at risk, I wanna vomit!!!
Ответитьeverything elon is over priced!
ОтветитьOh go on then - I'll have one, as long as it comes in red and has a banging stereo system.....
Seriously, it looks great but space planes will really only come of age when they can achieve orbit under their own propulsion?
Musk is a traitor..
ОтветитьFake nonsense. Zero has ever worked or tested
ОтветитьNo way is that pos going to fly.
ОтветитьThis is old hat!!! Dynorsoar was the first lifting body space craft lol this is a copy of it!
ОтветитьThe space shuttle did a Great job during its tenure, the dump truck that built the space station ❤
ОтветитьI'm getting flashbacks of that failed sub mission.
ОтветитьWhat happened to the Space Shuttle version China developed?
ОтветитьSpace X technology is ahead of NASA. Looking at space suit Space X suit is lighter and custom made. NASA only believe the heat tiles must be ceramic. Space X tiles is steel and is said to be 200X better
ОтветитьSo, what is the maximum weight, booster rockets and full fuel tank added, for a space plane strapped to a suped up jumbo jet(with 1/3 full fuel tanks) that can fly to 30,000+ feet?
ОтветитьMight I say: sir Elon
You lost the tesla
You're playing with starlink
and I was looking forward to
Mars
Gary from Canada