Комментарии:
Ok, you convinced me, we’ll use the other type.
ОтветитьThe second one chance fall?
ОтветитьI feel having a monorail in the middle could keep the train from tipping too far in either direction
Ответитьwhy not just have it in an angle?
ОтветитьWhy not have both? Sure, there is cost, but it's stable
Ответить“Aww, it’s not for you… it’s more of a Shelbyville thing” 😂
ОтветитьOne emp and its over (correcct me if im wrong)
ОтветитьThis is how the pyramids were built they used magnets
Ответить“And your mother was banned from riding this type of train after she got on and the entire thing derailed due to her weight.”
ОтветитьWhy not both for redundancy?
ОтветитьWhy not have both attractive and repulsive mag lev systems on the same train
ОтветитьWrong color
ОтветитьYou could also mount the rails above the train.
ОтветитьThey might still have wheels under, in case they fall
Ответитьwhy dont we use the two push and pull?
Ответить🔥🔥
Ответитьbetter to say that option 1 is unstable vertically but stable horizontally and option 2 is stable vertically buty unstable horizontally.
for option 2 i wonder if its possible to have 2 repulsion magnets on both sides and 1 slightly attractive magnet in the middle
surely a properly tuned PID loop can hold it in place even if it is an unstable equilibrium
ОтветитьAlways assumed it was pushing up.
Like air hockey
Doesn't the force from a magnet on another magnet drop off as 1/r^3 if they aren't super close. Or I guess are these magnets close enough to approximate it with r^-a where a is closeish to 2?
ОтветитьWhile repulsion has its advantages, magnets will decay faster if continuously repelling. They last a lot longer as magnets when their magnetic forces ate always pulled into alignment.
That one reason pull is better then repel.
Why_not_both.jpg
ОтветитьUse both methods
ОтветитьWhy mention Japan's Maglev and not the one in China that has been running hauling passengers for over a decade already...and it's not a short route.
Ответить😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
ОтветитьINC
Inc
INC.
What about just using wheels
ОтветитьWhy not try both....(?)..😊
ОтветитьWow...8 to 12mm? That's around the tolerance I can hold on a fence project post to post.
ОтветитьAlong the axis of the magnetic field, it actually decreases by 1/(d^3) since it is a dipole
ОтветитьSo sad, Germany abandoned all Transrapid projects...
Ответить8mm 1/3 inch
12mm 1/2 inch
Roughly for those uninitiated
I have the biggest attractive force in the world.
I think I weighed it in at Cash converters.....?
Catalytic cash converters?
So much wrong in one video...
ОтветитьJapanese is against law and ahead
ОтветитьCould you please makae a video about the company IronLev? It should be a passive "sort of" levitation and I would be super curious to see some analysis from someone "not inside the company" like you
ОтветитьThe important point is: dont clear the train to highball if you parked a maintenance vehicle on the track.
ОтветитьJapan’s maglev??? The train showed in the clip are German… Transrapid (Siemens / Thysenkrupp)
ОтветитьIt would really suck if it got really cold outside
ОтветитьThey have tires though
ОтветитьSo basically, we have one primary method
ОтветитьWhy not both?
ОтветитьWhy not both?
ОтветитьThe first system is used by germans and the second is used by japaneses. With the second one the train reaches faster speeds.
ОтветитьIf the someone in the u.s. could build these over free ways(cause people don't want to give up land) and make the check in process less of a walk than air ports and with comfortable spacy seats, feel like they'd be profitable!
ОтветитьMake a hybrid train
......maglev cum traditional on diesel and electric...how this will be😅
why not just put it UPSIDE DOWN
ОтветитьLinear motor
ОтветитьGood explenation
ОтветитьWhy not use both
Ответить