5D Mark II vs 5D Mark III comparison: Portraits, studio, landscapes, wildlife, night, and HDR review

Past 12 years, and I say DSLR forever!!!

Chelsea is so hot

YALL LOOK SO YOUNG!!

Watching in 2024 and this is fucking hilarious lol these cameras are awful

What a bunch of BS, Tony is making false clames today as well as he was doing it a decade ago. The first picture is clearly cheated: on the Mark II Chelsea is obviously illuminated but the lamp and overexposed where the 5D Mark III is natural light only and properly exposed... Less light with equal ISO value naturally will produce more noise. The funny part is that Mark III even with less light has produced cleaner pictures despite Tony's false claims of more grain... He has been proven time and time again selling false claims banking on his viewers not fully understanding physics of light and optics 🤷‍♂️

Watching this in 2023 shows me that Tony doesn’t age. 🤔

Watching this in 2023 shows me that you don’t need IBIS to achieve great photos!

Nice share video👍

the mark ii crashes mark iii in video

10 yr ago Wow time flies.

Eeeee so??? Lol 👍👊

Wow they were young

eso? Iso?

I still shoot with a 5d mk2.... was considering upgrading to an used mk3, but probably I'll keep this one for another year or so.

Great review! Honest and in depth!

E-so

you gonna break the lens photoing that ahahahahahaha

Nice

There is no significant difference between the two. Remember that the amount of information in a 35mm Kodachrome frame is around 20 megapixels - and the Canon 5dII fulfills that requirement perfectly. That's enough? Watch a classic Stanley Kubric movie - they were shot at 35mm! The same phenomenon occurs in smartphones with the processing limit between devices being of little relevance. The fact is that Canon and Nikon have reached the limit and the next development is probably the mirrorless camera or the Medium Format camera.

OVERPRICED and still inferior to film bodies . My SL-1 is just as good at fraction of cost.

Great review

E SO

I have mark 2 it’s fantastic

THANK YOU SO MUCH for this video! I'm doing mainly headshot and portrait and know nothing about full frame. I was looking at the Mark iii but your video helped me see that I really don't need it. Very good info and in depth clarification. Well done!

I love the Mark 11

Eeeeeeee so

You look so young Tony ^^ time has passed lol

Tnx

You both Rock! Thanks very much

Thank you for this helpful video!

LOL bokeh. Some things never change... :)

Very usefull content, thank you!

Hi Tony could you please also list the name of the cameras and lenses you use to make these videos.
Thanks

Iso

Hmmm. I'm thinking about upgrading from 7D to 5D Mark 2 or 5D Mark 3. There's significant difference in price and 5D Mark 2 and 3. I plan on shooting weddings, guests at a hotel (hotel or tourism photography) and I also enjoy shooting birds in flight and some sports (mainly cycling). Considering what I plan to shoot mark 3 is clear winner but the price difference is really giving me a big problem. Really hard to make a decision. For lenses I plan on buying 70-200 F4L IS USM, 24-105 f4L IS USM and 50mm stm lenses to start with.

these entitled rich kids sicken me

Nice review. How about the color difference in them?

If your exposure is low than on another shoot - of course you will have more NOISE. Make shots on same exposure.

These tests dont really show substantial evidence of the actual cameras abilities versus the person taking pictures with them. The pixel pushing is informative but his choice of settings may have affected the images qualities.

Hey Tony, have you ever tried back button focus with the 5DII? Where you doing BBF back then?

eso? smh

is it worth buying canon 5d mk ii in 2019?

GPEG

Always remember: ISO is the most important thing in the photography world. I learned that on this channel.....

Eso horny!

ESO ?.. ffs