5D Mark II vs 5D Mark III comparison: Portraits, studio, landscapes, wildlife, night, and HDR review

ESO ?.. ffs

Eso horny!

Always remember: ISO is the most important thing in the photography world. I learned that on this channel.....

GPEG

is it worth buying canon 5d mk ii in 2019?

eso? smh

Hey Tony, have you ever tried back button focus with the 5DII? Where you doing BBF back then?

These tests dont really show substantial evidence of the actual cameras abilities versus the person taking pictures with them. The pixel pushing is informative but his choice of settings may have affected the images qualities.

If your exposure is low than on another shoot - of course you will have more NOISE. Make shots on same exposure.

Nice review. How about the color difference in them?

these entitled rich kids sicken me

Hmmm. I'm thinking about upgrading from 7D to 5D Mark 2 or 5D Mark 3. There's significant difference in price and 5D Mark 2 and 3. I plan on shooting weddings, guests at a hotel (hotel or tourism photography) and I also enjoy shooting birds in flight and some sports (mainly cycling). Considering what I plan to shoot mark 3 is clear winner but the price difference is really giving me a big problem. Really hard to make a decision. For lenses I plan on buying 70-200 F4L IS USM, 24-105 f4L IS USM and 50mm stm lenses to start with.

Iso

Hi Tony could you please also list the name of the cameras and lenses you use to make these videos.
Thanks

Very usefull content, thank you!

LOL bokeh. Some things never change... :)

Thank you for this helpful video!

You both Rock! Thanks very much

Tnx

You look so young Tony ^^ time has passed lol

Eeeeeeee so

I love the Mark 11

THANK YOU SO MUCH for this video! I'm doing mainly headshot and portrait and know nothing about full frame. I was looking at the Mark iii but your video helped me see that I really don't need it. Very good info and in depth clarification. Well done!

I have mark 2 it’s fantastic

E SO

Great review

OVERPRICED and still inferior to film bodies . My SL-1 is just as good at fraction of cost.

There is no significant difference between the two. Remember that the amount of information in a 35mm Kodachrome frame is around 20 megapixels - and the Canon 5dII fulfills that requirement perfectly. That's enough? Watch a classic Stanley Kubric movie - they were shot at 35mm! The same phenomenon occurs in smartphones with the processing limit between devices being of little relevance. The fact is that Canon and Nikon have reached the limit and the next development is probably the mirrorless camera or the Medium Format camera.

Nice

you gonna break the lens photoing that ahahahahahaha

E-so

Great review! Honest and in depth!

I still shoot with a 5d mk2.... was considering upgrading to an used mk3, but probably I'll keep this one for another year or so.

eso? Iso?

Wow they were young

Eeeee so??? Lol 👍👊

10 yr ago Wow time flies.

the mark ii crashes mark iii in video

Nice share video👍

Watching this in 2023 shows me that you don’t need IBIS to achieve great photos!

Watching this in 2023 shows me that Tony doesn’t age. 🤔

What a bunch of BS, Tony is making false clames today as well as he was doing it a decade ago. The first picture is clearly cheated: on the Mark II Chelsea is obviously illuminated but the lamp and overexposed where the 5D Mark III is natural light only and properly exposed... Less light with equal ISO value naturally will produce more noise. The funny part is that Mark III even with less light has produced cleaner pictures despite Tony's false claims of more grain... He has been proven time and time again selling false claims banking on his viewers not fully understanding physics of light and optics 🤷‍♂️

Watching in 2024 and this is fucking hilarious lol these cameras are awful

YALL LOOK SO YOUNG!!

Chelsea is so hot

Past 12 years, and I say DSLR forever!!!