Комментарии:
And what is "official" about this?
ОтветитьBuzzing is a understatement.
More like the biggest dumpsterfire in miniature history.
Couldn't care less about the lore, its just a low cost to entry or alternative to those that cannot afford the figure and paint. The colour scheme looks fantastic. Nice video. Keep up the good work.
ОтветитьIf they just stopped releasing heads and instead just released helmets this wouldn't be a discussion. My Ultramarine could be named Lisa for all I care. Most armor wouldn't be changed anyways and most of the female form would probably disappear due to all the all the fiddling with genes and extra stuff they put into space marines.
ОтветитьWell you can’t have female space marines as the primaries were male. However Custodies are hand crafted so why not. But bit odd we have not seen one in the heresy lore
ОтветитьOkay so seeing as there's female custodes now or always do you think are going to get like male sororitas or anything since you're going to be inclusive and that means you know both parties get to have representation not just one gets something all the time because they're complaining
ОтветитьIs that the game envy handle? I've been thinking about getting one because I realize I still don't use The handles I have very much because I tend to like holding the model, apparently. If it is, does it happen to have magnets in its base like the red grass one does? If not does it look like it would be easy to mod?
ОтветитьThought on the exaggerated breastplate and extra wide hips.
I can understand the comment on the breastplate because it is actually pretty silly. My thought on the hips it though is That if you don't exaggerate something then the character still isn't going to look very female... It doesn't help that they decided to go top knot with 80% of the armies... So it's not like you can use ponytails and such to distinguish female characters. Yes you can distinguish with facial features but some of us aren't very good at painting faces, So at this scale it only gets you so far. Heck I've even gone so far as to say is that I don't bother to paint faces outside of giving them a wash in 40k. So is there a compromise on this one? Something that would make women happy about not being overly sexualized (at least it's not that war games company that makes nudie pinup models for 40k) while still finding some way to make it obvious that you're dealing with a woman in armor?
Someone recently referred me to the comment that Tony Stark makes at the beginning of the first iron Man movie to the female soldier. However, I don't actually have particularly strong feelings on this... I'm just happy that female models aren't being introduced to the game.
You might not realize this but some of the chaos cultists including those in Blackstone fortress are female. I didn't realize it initially until I looked very closely at the models.
From a lower perspective I think this is a good "change". I'd also like to say that leading up to the latest guard release I had bought every special black library female guard model because I'm trying to encourage GW to make more female models. I don't even play guard there sitting in their boxes in my pile of... Potential.
Thought on your comment on the sisters of silence and sign language. While I hear your point Lyla you also sound kind of condescending to deaf people. Like you're saying that because they have to communicate in a different way that their voice doesn't matter because we aren't hearing it.
I realize I'm a man commenting on this... I'm only a man that's hard of hearing and I'm not deaf and I don't do ASL. However, might be good to say that they represent deaf people. Think of the Marvel character Echo. Daredevil is also literally blind.
Weird that these people have a problem with fem custodes but didnt make a peep when AN ENTIRE 13TH BLACK CRUSADE was disappeared. Also, people complaining the game "went woke" when the entire thing started as a parody of Thatcher era right wing shit by a bunch of working class leftists, just like Judge Dredd.
ОтветитьThe Death of my Hobby. 40 years of lore thrown away for feely feely people. Disgusting
Ответитьalright.... male sister of silence when?
ОтветитьHERETICS
ОтветитьLore braking BS.
ОтветитьStupid change...
ОтветитьWoww so coool
ОтветитьThe addition of female custodes is not the issue, the pazy and hamfusted waybit was done is not good for a lore setting built on lore. The addition of female custodes should have came with a lore book and a thought out explination. The lore deserves better and Femstodes deserve a named hero.
ОтветитьTerrible change imo. I know GW wont give a toss anyway but wont give them another penny. On top of that the rules for custodes were terrible and the models are increasingly overpriced in a time of global recession.
Ответитьofficial lol
ОтветитьNope Nope and nope
ОтветитьI like the change, they just should added female heads to the new Combat Patrol.
ОтветитьLooking awfully "muscle mommy" for a genetic freak, to the surprise of nobody GW's "they're the same" narrative was a lie.
ОтветитьChanging the lore to satisfy a minority group of fans has never been a good idea. But good luck with the newly feminized brand
Ответить2.4K dislikes btw XD
Ответитьthat small head on that huge armor looks so funny. Still looks really cool though.
ОтветитьHobby killer. We need a boycott to shake GW up. The majority of the consumers who don't want this change must speak with their wallets.
Ответитьgay...
ОтветитьHERESY
ОтветитьHeresy
ОтветитьNo such thing as female custodes, there I said it, now stop fucking up Warhammer lore.
ОтветитьThere are no women Custodes. 🤷♂️
ОтветитьIn 40 years of WH this is the biggest HERESSY I have ever witness
ОтветитьBs lgb kill starwars now 40k😢
ОтветитьOnly if Hitler was a dark skin female......
Otherwise, there are NO female custodes
none, zero, not one.
love you lyla please keep bringing this positivity and openmindedness to the closeminded warhammer community.
Ответитьgreat conversion, still hate gw's lore change
ОтветитьFemale custodes aren't canon. Games Workshop is simply wrong in claiming they are.
Ответить“While I’m thrilled”
Youre brain rotted. Or a paid shill. Take your pick.
Heresy
Ответить🤦
ОтветитьThanks for adressing the mesogynistic point of 'sisters of silence'. I mean, yes now women can be there, but they cant speak up? Its again a dream of patriarchy reproduced. Amazing paint job btw. The male breast plate with exagurated male tit-muscles already has enough space for womens breasts 😂
ОтветитьWhy do women always push all male factions to include females but flip their shit if anyone wants to do the same with female only factions? How is this not blatant sexism? It's crazy how women cry so much about sexism and have no problem with being sexist.
ОтветитьI love this conversion. I don't get the whining about reconning lore, GW has been doing it for years. It's not like they're suddenly making every Custodes female and it's nice to see a non hyper sexualized female unit.
ОтветитьWell, there goes Disney 40k. It's dead, and it's not coming back. Gatekeeping is important.
ОтветитьShe really said only get them if theres female troops really thats your go to gender in warhammer means nothing
ОтветитьNO FEMALE CUSTODES, SO MENY LADY WAR GROUPS ALLREADY THERE ARE!!
ОтветитьJust don’t want a woke grape of the warhammer 40k series
Ответитьkinda gay
ОтветитьAfter being blocked for the hundredth time for criticizing this retcon only from the point of view of bad writing, I got sick of Warhammer 40K If I can no longer criticize the product I spend money on, I don't want to have anything to do with it, that's what this retcon represents to me.
I just think that retcons of this kind are not a problem for a board game, but they're not compatible with other media like books or movies, you can't take women out of one faction like they did years ago and then reintroduce them into another In both cases, pretending that nothing happened It's just a bad way to write.
THE HERESY! IT BURNS IT BURNSSSSSSsssss!!!!!
Ответить