Mens Rea # 1 - Direct and Indirect intention

Great video, keep it up.

HEy...you are best LAw teacher Ive heard so far ;)

Very informative lecture. I found it authoritative and really quite fantastic!

Thank you Geng

Thanks for the videos mate they're really helpful, keep it up.

Good Day.
Due to my demanding job, i am looking for online lectures such as this one to help me speed up my learning.
Would this lecture be sufficient material for the exam???
Please let me know, i would greatly appreciate any response.

Regards
Johannes

Brilliant videos mate

anyone.. indirect same as oblique right?

Yes they are the same Jess

Do you aslo do contract lectures??? been watching your videos. very impressed!  Thank you so much

quite a helpful video!

Thanks for these lectures, i couldnt thank you enough for it but please i have one question that why was nedrick and woolin conviction was substituted to manslaughter other the mis direction, which part of the two test could not be satisfied, was it that death was not a virtual certainty in those cases or that defendant didnt appreciated that that was the case thanks i ll be waiting for you answers

Instant sub!

I found the video very interesting and informative especially in the contradictory part of the need of wide but narrow (from direct intent) definition of indirect intent

Is knowing and intent the same?

hi there, anyone has the slides of these lessons ? :D cheers

Thank you

Is specific intent the same as direct intent? What is the difference between ulteiror intent, and basic intent and specific?

👍👍

Correct me if I'm wrong:

So virtually certian means that the consequence is certian (very likely) to happen. And if the defendant knew that the consequences where virtually certian then they had a direct intention for the consequences to occur. However if the defendant didn't foresee the consequences of their actions as virtually certian then it is an oblique intention therefore they will have a shorter sentence. So if the victim had died and the defendant knew that it was virtually certian then they will be liable for muder but if they didn't know that it was virtually certian then they will only be liable for manslaughter.

Hello Sir.

Thank you so much for helpful videos

Very helpful, thanks for the upload.

Have you got an email? Wanted to enquire about tutoring please? I'm a second year LLB law student and I would really appreciate it if you could help! Thank you

oh Thank youuu so much for this useful video. Today is my exam.. Keep going ! all the best!

God! Your way of explaining is absolutely flawless. Highly appreciate!

Is this still on the current syllabus? I’m aware this video was posted 7 years ago but thought I’d ask

Superb videos.

This is great, thank you so much :)

anyone here at degree level lmao

Case of r v Mohan is quite relevent for indirect intent as his aim was to escape and not to kill the police officer

CovidImages need to be invested more than half19

This video is incredible.

how did you do it can you share with me , thank you

Thanks for the vedios, they are too helpful