[stream recording] poking fun at/debunking John Gabriel's ZFC "debunk"

Those fucking topologists though

Wow, you have so much patience. JG makes so many mistakes and has so many misconceptions. Almost like straw man arguments. No wonder you have to stop his videos so often to make a comment. You explain things very well! I haven't finished watching this, it's quite long. But I'll come back every so often to watch a bit more. Did you see the video he posted recently that got taken down by YT? It was hilarious, although I understand it was also offensive.

It's funny how he seems compelled to dispute all of the ZFC axioms, when he really only needs to disprove one of them. And he can't do that anyway.

JG seems obsessed with Orangutans, ha ha.

What I find stupid almost to the point of pulling my hair out is the mainstream claim that a set is not only equal to another set if its members (subsets or not) match those of the other, but also by those elements not in either set.

Example for psychotic set theorists and topologists:

A = { 2; 3; 7 } and B = {dog, cat}

The objects 5 and elephant are in neither set does NOT tell us anything about the equality of A and B.

I am laughing long and hard at you incorrigible fools!

You sound like Magnus Carlsen

ZFC is garbage (IMO), but John Gabriel is still a crank (and entertaining). Australian math proffessor Norman Wildberger has an actual coherent take on ZFC, without the crazy and egoism of JG.

Sure, he is mad/angry. But please have a look at the new claims he is making, instead of his debunking.