How to Shop the Jerky Section and Stay on Your Diet

Who even was that... whoever that guy was and what even was he trying to point?

Loved the video brother

What about the Mormons in Utah?? They have multiple wives!!

Islam is not about peace. Islam is about Justice. Without justice there’s no peace.

I found my eyebrows raised when I heard the curly-haired man talking about Islam. It was ridiculous. do some research man. whatever you say, doesn't impact at all, if cnn can't what makes you think that you can? daa they keep reverting whether you like it or not.

I find it intellectually inconsistent when commentators such as @truth3891 accuse Muslims of dishonesty in discussions of scripture. They dismiss Muslim claims of biblical corruption as unfounded, yet simultaneously assert that the Quran has been altered and exists in multiple conflicting versions—despite neither claim being supported by robust or credible evidence.

Historical context is crucial here. The early Christian Church had an established papacy and demonstrated institutional and academic capacity, including the ability to convene councils to define doctrine. The Christian communities contemporary with the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and his companions were literate and sufficiently organized to engage critically with emerging Islamic texts. For instance, some companions of the Prophet are recorded as having recited Surah Maryam in the Christian kingdom of Ethiopia. Later, during the Crusades, it is difficult to imagine that Christian forces did not come into contact with Muslim prisoners or Quranic manuscripts. Given the Quran's central role in shaping Muslim identity, morale, and resistance, it is implausible that Christian warlords would have disregarded such a potent source of ideological strength. One would reasonably expect that any such material would have been extracted, preserved, and studied carefully.

The absence of any verifiable, contemporaneous Christian records critiquing the Quran's content or integrity—especially from communities that were neither disengaged nor uninformed—raises serious doubts about the credibility of modern claims of Quranic corruption. Such assertions, if they are to be taken seriously, must be rooted in evidence rather than conjecture.

that guy in the video was a X muslim i dont know why he hate islam like that may ALLAH guide him ameen

This must be the most stupid Christian I’ve ever seen talking about Islam 😂😂

Alhamdulillah☝

Muslims don't know what Islam is, but these pig-eaters and followers of Satan know what Islam is.

He look like he like 🌈🌈🌈🌈

Happens in trinidad and tobago every eid

You say Christians worship a human, yet Muslims literally mention Muhammad’s name in every prayer, send blessings on him constantly, and even have stories in your own Hadith where people caught his spit, wiped his sweat on themselves, and drank his blood (see Sahih Bukhari and Ibn Sa’d’s Tabaqat). That sounds a lot more like human veneration than anything Christians do.

We pray to God, through Jesus—who is God in the flesh. Meanwhile, Muslims include Muhammad in every formal prayer. So if you’re going to talk about worshipping a human, maybe look closer at your own sources first.

What peace myth? You don't bother Muslims they won't bother you. It's not a pacifist religion. I don't know what these morons don't get?

MANY ARE THREATENED BY ISLAM

So you cut out the parts where Saint AVS said he has read the Quran (I know he has because I have watched him for years) and presented why he doesn't believe in it. You also didn't show when he said he loves muslims then gives them evidence for why islam is false. He made an entire video called the Islamic Dilemma but obviously you are hiding behind pride and arrogance whilst masking it and accusing others. Very typical.

HE IS BUTT HURT EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN

Uthman was not killed by non-believers, but by Muslims—rebels who had memorized the Qur’an, prayed, and considered themselves righteous. They accused Uthman of corruption, favoritism (especially toward his Umayyad relatives), and altering religious governance

So when people claim Islam is unified or the Qur’an was “perfectly preserved,” the fact that the man who standardized it was murdered by fellow Muslims should make them pause.

Uthman was not killed by non-believers, but by Muslims—rebels who had memorized the Qur’an, prayed, and considered themselves righteous. They accused Uthman of corruption, favoritism (especially toward his Umayyad relatives), and altering religious governance

So when people claim Islam is unified or the Qur’an was “perfectly preserved,” the fact that the man who standardized it was murdered by fellow Muslims should make them pause.

You quote that Allah will protect and perfect His light, but the history of the Qur’an says otherwise. Uthman—the very caliph who standardized the Qur’an—was killed by fellow Muslims, not disbelievers. This is recorded by respected Islamic historians like al-Tabari, Ibn Kathir, and al-Baladhuri. The people who murdered him were Muslim rebels from Egypt and Iraq, angry over his leadership and accusations of corruption.

And why did he standardize the Qur’an in the first place? Because there were multiple versions, and Muslims were arguing about which one was correct. So he ordered all other copies to be burned (Sahih Bukhari 4987).

If the Qur’an was truly preserved without error, why was there a need to burn versions and kill the man who tried to fix it? You can’t just quote one verse and ignore your own history.

These individuals are neither recognized scholars nor true representatives of Islam, they are relatively unknown and lack credibility

This is so hypocritical coming from these Christians. They complain about Islam “taking over” but look. They live in a secular country with LIBERAL values. One of which as Bobby said is freedom of religion. Yet these Christian’s are fighting against that foundational value of their country. They talk out of both sides of their mouth but don’t even realize their own words go against themselves. There’s also immense violence in the Bible that far exceeds the Quran. And the Christian is complaining about polygamy, yet sexual promiscuity is rampant in the west. They have multiple partners with no responsibility. Yet he has a problem with MARRIAGE to more than one women? These arguments are getting so weak and uninteresting.

The most evil faith if you look at logic its Christiananity and any religion that is supported by western powers

The entire world will now down before Allah in humble servitude

U people don't have any idea what you are playing with. Allah the most merciful is watching and time will tell inshallah

S a
Brother. Thank you for your videos on educating these hypocrite people. MarshALLAH tebarekALLAH

I’m honestly enjoying how Christians in this comment section are scrambling like chickens without their heads. The funny part? We’re not even attacking Christianity — we’re just defending Islam. But somehow, that alone sends you into a meltdown.

And I get it. It hurts watching your theology collapse under basic logic, while Islam grows — 11,000 people leaving Christianity for Islam every single day. That’s not a coincidence. That’s people waking up.

Let’s talk about your so-called “preserved scripture.” You proudly wave around 5,800 Greek NT manuscripts — yet forget to mention they were written centuries after Jesus, by unknown authors, with contradictory accounts. Your earliest "Gospel of John" copy (P52) is a tiny scrap from the 2nd century, over 100 years after Jesus — and you call that evidence?

Worse, you don’t even know who wrote these “gospels.” Was it actually Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John? You don't know. There’s zero historical certainty, and they contradict each other on core events. Two are even copies of the others. You mock the Quran’s preservation while standing on four anonymous, contradictory, copied, and heavily edited documents?

And while you criticize Islam for alleged hadith loss — let’s not pretend your religion even has a chain of narration system. In Islam, the Qur'an was preserved both orally and scripturally, under direct supervision of the Prophet, peace be upon him. Uthman’s compilation wasn’t censorship — it was standardization, and guess what? It proves preservation, not contradiction.

Unlike your scriptures, we know exactly who wrote the Qur'an, when, and how — and the oldest manuscripts we have were written by people who lived with the Prophet. The Sana'a manuscripts don’t disprove preservation; they actually confirm it. Even the spelling variations are grammatical, not doctrinal — unlike your gospels which differ on who saw Jesus, what he said, and when he rose.

And now let’s address the elephant in your church: the Trinity.

You say it was always there — yet it took 300 years and a Roman council to “clarify” it? If it was so central, why was Jesus never recorded teaching it? You quote Church Fathers like Ignatius and Justin Martyr, but they lived after Jesus, just like the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD. So again, man-made theology.

Meanwhile, Islam's theology was crystal clear from day one: God is One. Not three. Not divided. Not incarnated. Not crucified.

You say Jesus is God — but he prayed to God. Was he praying to himself? Does God have a God?

And let’s cut through the philosophical gymnastics:
God killed God to save you from God because of a law God made, but only if you believe God came back to life and now sits beside God? What is this? A divine soap opera?

You mock Muslims for not worshipping Prophet Muhammad ﷺ — but that’s the point. We don’t worship humans. He was a man. A messenger. Just like Jesus was.

You worship the creation and call it devotion. We worship the Creator and call it Islam.

Jesus fasted, didn’t eat pork, didn’t drink alcohol, and put his forehead on the ground in prayer. That’s not Christianity — that’s Islam. He never preached Trinity. Never said worship him. Never told people to make statues. He followed pure monotheism — same as Abraham, Moses, and Muhammad.

You quote “lost verses” in hadith — at least we have hadith. You have fabricated theology, no chain of narration, and a 2,000-year-long game of telephone. Your scriptures were assembled by committees, redacted by emperors, and then retranslated by political interests. We know it, and deep down, you know it too.

And when we point all this out — you either block us, cry “you’re not open-minded,” or change the topic altogether. Why? Because you can’t face the truth. You’re not interested in a real debate — you’re just terrified of what will happen if you actually listen.

But your hatred for truth won’t save you. It’ll only make you miserable — in this world and the next.

اللهم اهدهم أو اكفنا شرهم
(May God guide them — or protect us from their harm.)

I’m honestly enjoying how Christians in this comment section are scrambling like chickens without their heads. The funny part? We’re not even attacking Christianity — we’re just defending Islam. But somehow, that alone sends you into a meltdown.

And I get it. It hurts watching your theology collapse under basic logic, while Islam grows — 11,000 people leaving Christianity for Islam every single day. That’s not a coincidence. That’s people waking up.

Let’s talk about your so-called “preserved scripture.” You proudly wave around 5,800 Greek NT manuscripts — yet forget to mention they were written centuries after Jesus, by unknown authors, with contradictory accounts. Your earliest "Gospel of John" copy (P52) is a tiny scrap from the 2nd century, over 100 years after Jesus — and you call that evidence?

Worse, you don’t even know who wrote these “gospels.” Was it actually Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John? You don't know. There’s zero historical certainty, and they contradict each other on core events. Two are even copies of the others. You mock the Quran’s preservation while standing on four anonymous, contradictory, copied, and heavily edited documents?

And while you criticize Islam for alleged hadith loss — let’s not pretend your religion even has a chain of narration system. In Islam, the Qur'an was preserved both orally and scripturally, under direct supervision of the Prophet, peace be upon him. Uthman’s compilation wasn’t censorship — it was standardization, and guess what? It proves preservation, not contradiction.

Unlike your scriptures, we know exactly who wrote the Qur'an, when, and how — and the oldest manuscripts we have were written by people who lived with the Prophet. The Sana'a manuscripts don’t disprove preservation; they actually confirm it. Even the spelling variations are grammatical, not doctrinal — unlike your gospels which differ on who saw Jesus, what he said, and when he rose.

And now let’s address the elephant in your church: the Trinity.

You say it was always there — yet it took 300 years and a Roman council to “clarify” it? If it was so central, why was Jesus never recorded teaching it? You quote Church Fathers like Ignatius and Justin Martyr, but they lived after Jesus, just like the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD. So again, man-made theology.

Meanwhile, Islam's theology was crystal clear from day one: God is One. Not three. Not divided. Not incarnated. Not crucified.

You say Jesus is God — but he prayed to God. Was he praying to himself? Does God have a God?

And let’s cut through the philosophical gymnastics:
God killed God to save you from God because of a law God made, but only if you believe God came back to life and now sits beside God? What is this? A divine soap opera?

You mock Muslims for not worshipping Prophet Muhammad ﷺ — but that’s the point. We don’t worship humans. He was a man. A messenger. Just like Jesus was.

You worship the creation and call it devotion. We worship the Creator and call it Islam.

Jesus fasted, didn’t eat pork, didn’t drink alcohol, and put his forehead on the ground in prayer. That’s not Christianity — that’s Islam. He never preached Trinity. Never said worship him. Never told people to make statues. He followed pure monotheism — same as Abraham, Moses, and Muhammad.

You quote “lost verses” in hadith — at least we have hadith. You have fabricated theology, no chain of narration, and a 2,000-year-long game of telephone. Your scriptures were assembled by committees, redacted by emperors, and then retranslated by political interests. We know it, and deep down, you know it too.

And when we point all this out — you either block us, cry “you’re not open-minded,” or change the topic altogether. Why? Because you can’t face the truth. You’re not interested in a real debate — you’re just terrified of what will happen if you actually listen.

But your hatred for truth won’t save you. It’ll only make you miserable — in this world and the next.

اللهم اهدهم أو اكفنا شرهم
(May God guide them — or protect us from their harm.)

I’m honestly enjoying how Christians in this comment section are scrambling like chickens without their heads. The funny part? We’re not even attacking Christianity — we’re just defending Islam. But somehow, that alone sends you into a meltdown.

And I get it. It hurts watching your theology collapse under basic logic, while Islam grows — 11,000 people leaving Christianity for Islam every single day. That’s not a coincidence. That’s people waking up.

Let’s talk about your so-called “preserved scripture.” You proudly wave around 5,800 Greek NT manuscripts — yet forget to mention they were written centuries after Jesus, by unknown authors, with contradictory accounts. Your earliest "Gospel of John" copy (P52) is a tiny scrap from the 2nd century, over 100 years after Jesus — and you call that evidence?

Worse, you don’t even know who wrote these “gospels.” Was it actually Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John? You don't know. There’s zero historical certainty, and they contradict each other on core events. Two are even copies of the others. You mock the Quran’s preservation while standing on four anonymous, contradictory, copied, and heavily edited documents?

And while you criticize Islam for alleged hadith loss — let’s not pretend your religion even has a chain of narration system. In Islam, the Qur'an was preserved both orally and scripturally, under direct supervision of the Prophet, peace be upon him. Uthman’s compilation wasn’t censorship — it was standardization, and guess what? It proves preservation, not contradiction.

Unlike your scriptures, we know exactly who wrote the Qur'an, when, and how — and the oldest manuscripts we have were written by people who lived with the Prophet. The Sana'a manuscripts don’t disprove preservation; they actually confirm it. Even the spelling variations are grammatical, not doctrinal — unlike your gospels which differ on who saw Jesus, what he said, and when he rose.

And now let’s address the elephant in your church: the Trinity.

You say it was always there — yet it took 300 years and a Roman council to “clarify” it? If it was so central, why was Jesus never recorded teaching it? You quote Church Fathers like Ignatius and Justin Martyr, but they lived after Jesus, just like the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD. So again, man-made theology.

Meanwhile, Islam's theology was crystal clear from day one: God is One. Not three. Not divided. Not incarnated. Not crucified.

You say Jesus is God — but he prayed to God. Was he praying to himself? Does God have a God?

And let’s cut through the philosophical gymnastics:
God killed God to save you from God because of a law God made, but only if you believe God came back to life and now sits beside God? What is this? A divine soap opera?

You mock Muslims for not worshipping Prophet Muhammad ﷺ — but that’s the point. We don’t worship humans. He was a man. A messenger. Just like Jesus was.

You worship the creation and call it devotion. We worship the Creator and call it Islam.

Jesus fasted, didn’t eat pork, didn’t drink alcohol, and put his forehead on the ground in prayer. That’s not Christianity — that’s Islam. He never preached Trinity. Never said worship him. Never told people to make statues. He followed pure monotheism — same as Abraham, Moses, and Muhammad.

You quote “lost verses” in hadith — at least we have hadith. You have fabricated theology, no chain of narration, and a 2,000-year-long game of telephone. Your scriptures were assembled by committees, redacted by emperors, and then retranslated by political interests. We know it, and deep down, you know it too.

And when we point all this out — you either block us, cry “you’re not open-minded,” or change the topic altogether. Why? Because you can’t face the truth. You’re not interested in a real debate — you’re just terrified of what will happen if you actually listen.

But your hatred for truth won’t save you. It’ll only make you miserable — in this world and the next.

اللهم اهدهم أو اكفنا شرهم
(May God guide them — or protect us from their harm.)

Stop ur lies and hatred about Islam the Word Islam means peace so get tf outta here !!!

Subhanallah

Great's video

There are two things in the world that are infinit one is universe other is stupidity of people, although I'm not sure about universe
_Albert Einstein

100% emotional, 0% evidence.

The man he take his video is a Somali man and as a Somali man we are 99% Muslim nation and we are not a shame to tell the truth ether you like or not western media is helping Muslim with your own propaganda to make Muslim bad so keep yelling 😂😂😂

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Dear Christians.....be honest and read the Quran and lesrn the truth that. islam is a religion of peace and not what Islamophobes who take excerpts from the Quran and qoute out of context to promote their warped anti - Islam phylosophy .

Alhamdulillah

The level of hypocrisy from this WESTERN Christian is astounding. Not to mention turn he’s completely clueless that the Peace in Islam, in submission to Allah, is internal peace. He’s so superficial he completely misses the point.

Is he wearing makeup? Looks like he's wearing some on his eye lol.

You tell em Bobby, ta baarik'Allah fih, it's disappointing how the so called "researchers of the truth of violence in Islam".... Never read the Quran.....

The second guy is an Iranian Zionist this so called white British hypocrite

because that's all they can do, lie after lie, their biggest enemy is their own book but unfortunately only a few read it from cover to cover and realize that their own religion is the one that supports the most severe violence, what's wrong with babies or even donkeys that you have to kill, can you imagine it?

Missing contexts, some even AVS left out/didn't know about:

1. Jesus will make all Christians Muslim by "breaking the cross" & "killing swines (i.e pigs)" (Hadith)

2. When the man thanked Western media, he meant for bashing Islam, thus encouraging non-Muslims to learn about it (as Bobby clarified in this video).

3. AVS, no. Islam is not the "Religion of peace" 20th century Hippies bragged about, but so weren't the US Marine, Royal Army, or the IDF. It's fine when they do it. At times, you seek peace by going to war, or you forgot about the Quraish when it came to Muhammad (SAAS)?

If he never wanted non-native Muslims in Britain, what did he expect following colonization in Africa and Asia, and then follow that up with British High Commissions and embassies in Anglophonic countries affected by economic hardships? Nigeria especially does "Japa."

The right to self defence is enshrined in international law. However more Muslim countries need to accept equality and freedom of religion. Saudi Arabia must allow freedom of other religions not just Islam.

You can see the hatred in their expressions , these guys probably have never had an interaction with any muslims at all just sit on their computers and spew false information and hatred

united kingdom christian: "bbc is working with islam"
also BBC: hamas terrorists found named "الأحد ، الجمعة ، السبت"