Комментарии:
Now we wait for Susskind's Students to show the Correspondence Principle applies to concave-convex Lensing scoping of the E-M spectrum in equivalence to ER=EPR Singularity-point omnidirectional-dimensional cause-effect self-defining holographic Actuality.
ОтветитьOn reading the thumbnail i had to strongly resist breaking out with ‘🎼 Figaro, magnifico, oh-oh-oh’
Ответить- Preaches about science and Galileo
- Gets money from an ad for doing so... :P lol
He didn't invent the telescope "Simon" although granted he did significantly improve upon it's design, however he doesn't merit credit for it's invention..
ОтветитьI thought it was Leonardo da Vinci the father of modern science.
After all, Galileo didn't never accepted the scientific method made by Da Vinci, not to mention that the first one to delve deep into medicine, developing this science and especially anathomics, was DaVinci.
Surely he was still a great Italian discoverer and "proto-scientist".
Galileo figured out the Square-Cube Law so I named the Twin Towers Affair after the Galileo Affair.
ОтветитьWhat a badass
ОтветитьThe way you made it sound so interesting! I love it! I did not want to study, but listening to you helped me a lot with my assignment! Thank you ❤
ОтветитьGalileo would have loved to use Brilliant!
ОтветитьGiula Galilei, really? Sounds very un-Italian. Maybe Giulia Galilei?
ОтветитьYou say that Kepler and Galilei established communicationin 1597? I thought this was in the early 1610s?
ОтветитьBlessings in an abundance of the faith. I salute you. 😘🙏Grace and peace be unto you and to this place. Thank you. God bless you. 😊Will you believe and receive Jesus Christ as your Lord and personal saviour??? I do. 😊
Ответить😊 great
Ответитьbetter you an anime animator and you narrate it seems perfect and interesting....
ОтветитьBrilliant Gallelio very nice history
ОтветитьAnother example of religion controlling how people think and what people are allowed to learn
ОтветитьAnd if you take the weight of the object, gravity and so on, then you get something... Asenq the actual acceleration of objects...
ОтветитьEd Why???? To calculate acceleration...
Ответитьed el I can destroy you at any time... Find out what they did to me... You will get the answer to all of your questions on how...
ОтветитьAn Object has a constant speed... According to Galileo... Aha... Now calculate direction... Where are you directed....
ОтветитьAnd to calculate the velocity you take "Time" which is Galileo, took the same time for objects to fall, and distance which we don't care.... if time is constant.
ОтветитьDid he time it??? Ed el timer... I timed it, they fall at the same speed... Then velocity is the same... and time and distance are proportional...
ОтветитьThat's if we don't care who is falling.... from the window....
ОтветитьThat's without force.... But if adding a weight was not going to force it... F = (G * m1 * m2) / d^2. Where G is the gravitational constant, m1 and m2 are the masses of the bodies, and d is the distance between them.
ОтветитьIsaac Newton
Legend has it that Isaac Newton formulated gravitational theory in 1665 or 1666 after watching an apple fall and asking why the apple fell straight down, rather than sideways or even upward.
Galileo showed that falling bodies do not have velocities proportional to their weights. Es cher????@ndhamen@?
ОтветитьHow people are not floating in the air...
ОтветитьFor example falling with a parachute vs falling without... Air is weighless. Kam air molecules weight...
ОтветитьPa grammam sshitali ili kilagrammam....
ОтветитьA kilogram idyot protiv gramma da? Pisa cher, no ne interesno????
ОтветитьAsuma Humans were not Triangles.... When you fall head takes over the body, therefore more weight to it...
ОтветитьNogi vs head... Now Swimming... Ponyali da???? Minimum all of us swimmed???? Ed el Manyak ein man galis 1.... Second time will be worse.... Minimum all of us fell from Tower of Hanoy!
ОтветитьZachem Uchit detey Kriminalov, ponyali da???? Nikto ne uchit.... A nu Rediska past parvu ili golovu atarvu.... Ed cher????? uxarki Hayastan, make them eat something kak budto i nichevo ne bilo....
ОтветитьEd el qshvatsner@ voch te us.... Asuma mat nauchila???? A kto yeshyo???? Zvinyayus...Semya urodov.... Yest xatite???? Net, spasibo.... Ponyali da, why????
ОтветитьAs new research is done and more information becomes available, things that were commonly considered “factual” are found to be false or incorrect. Coupled with frequent intentional misdirection and misrepresentation of “facts” being misconstrued to support a particular narrative a paradigm arises where the amount of dishonest or biased Information becomes so overwhelmingly abundant & readily available, that there is a complete inability to credibility rely on any previously provided data. This in turn ultimately results in the continual necessity to independently reconduct the research already accomplished in order to verify or confirm the results. This amount of redundancy & rework significantly impacts the ability to discover any truly new information or conduct meaningful research of any real importance. Likewise, this constant changing or modifying of what is considered to be “true” slowly chips away at our fundamental building blocks of knowledge & erodes confidence in the ability to actually discern truth. - In persecution of Galileo
ОтветитьGalileo did not invent the telescope.
ОтветитьI see im In my quarterly Simon Whistler binge phase again
ОтветитьDamn yall need to do better research or better writing. Galalio didn't invent the telescope. He did refine it to use for his astronomical research. I'm really questioning these your channels research methods. Any academic article about him will state the telescope was already invented and was used mostly as a novelty, and he was a pioneer of using it for astronomy.
ОтветитьSo even the story behind jesus christs crucifixion does not make sense because of the Galileo and Catholic church contraversy
All these different books of the bible and they can't even give a straight story regarding it
Italians when they were smart😂
ОтветитьFun fact, it wasn't until 1992 that the Pope officially acknowledged the Church’s errors and mistreatment toward Galileo. They recognized that the heliocentric model was scientifically correct at this time as well. Only took roughly 350 years after his death.
ОтветитьVincenzoooo
ОтветитьOne thing that wasn’t mentioned that Galileo was teaching heliocentric model without any evidence. He was asked repeatedly to produce evidence why he couldn’t. It was during his last years that he was able to develop evidence for the capermicun model
ОтветитьThey really punished this guy and hence a whole belief Church prosecuted science because he wittily said the pope was foolish for considering other theories? He was right though, at least he had a house visit. And the other scientist was just in a publishing debate, typical college shenanigans. I don't know why the pope and church would meddle in affairs like these, anyways. It's no wonder the pope considered other theories, maybe more religious, he's a religious figure who knows a lot about the faith. They might have made the universities, but that doesn't mean they are the university. Gailieo shouldn't even talked to the pope or the church, he was expecting something out of them that wasn't there. He could've just been a coward and engage no dialogue.
Ответить😢❤️
ОтветитьIt's ironic that a man that almost lost us sight due to eye infection, and eventually lost it in his final years, thanks to his invention and by his sight made his discoveries
ОтветитьSimon is awesome 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
Ответить