Комментарии:
More specifically, global warming is a fraud intended to fund a world government through carbon taxes.
ОтветитьI hope thos pricks can't take his PhD away
ОтветитьI don't believe that the scientists are "explicitly" working for a world government....but they know that if they swing the data the world will go in a general direction of bigger government. So, I think it is thought about, but no actual conspiracy planned.
ОтветитьThese hackers are heroes.
ОтветитьI can't believe those same scientists still deny these emails.
Ответитьthey havent denied the emails, the only thing they can say is "oh you're taking our emails out of context" yea they are screwed
ОтветитьSo much for bring back integrity into the science.
ОтветитьAccording to Cato, there are thousands of emails... well, yes, there usually are thsouands of emails within a research institute, probably the same goes for Cato, who, by the way focuses on free market research, not atmospheric science. Who are we to tell that the "thousands of emails" concern the details of dispute in the scientific analysis of global warming?
ОтветитьWhere are the criminal charges?!!
ОтветитьI hope you aren't positing that Cato are objective. It's a public policy lobby group with a right of the centre bias.
ОтветитьFor what exactly, having rivalries with other scientists? Writing emails about how to present data? What about criminal charges for stealing private emails? I'm sure the Cato Institute and Fox would agree?
Ответить@gezbrady Hmm, would you claim that the Australian CSIRO (THE Major Government Scientific Body in Australia) that has said that Global warming is hooey, is right wing as well? The Australian Prime Minister chose to IGNORE the Government research of many decades and voted with a Leftist Fringe Organisation with a Gore-ist agenda!
Ответить@red5llaw Obviously you can find out what my home nationality is easily, so can you put your research skills to the test and show me where CSIRO (you forgot to mention NON-POLITICALLY ALIGNED scientific body) has claimed that Global Warming is hooey? Because I can't find it. Also that last paragraph needs further explanation because it makes no sense. I presume you mean Kevin Rudd, if so, who did he vote with? Do you mean that his Environment minister is Peter Garrett?
Ответить@gezbrady Rudd chose to Ignore CSIRO & used the figures of a left leaning "Environmental Group" to base his Environment Policy on. You see gez - I have family in Australia. My Brothers listen and take note of decisions of their leaders too. They are disgusted with Rudd, especially with the public outing of the "Global Warming" movement. Liars and Political Whores.
ОтветитьDr Michaels makes some great points. He is not a AGW denier. He is a denier of the seriousness of AGW. Great video. Thanks.
ОтветитьThis is nonsense, these Bozos are trying to twist the meaning around so it sounds like the evidence is weak, but it really the corporate supported deniers who are trying to undermine the evidence, which should be obvious even to the person on the street.
These people are going to get theirs in the end.
All scientists have political agenda.
ОтветитьBut this did go away
Ответить