How to Get Ahead by Growing a Head

I like the direction you're going with the channel, keep it up. Talking about body forms and our thought processes, one aquarium shot pictured a slowly moving Sand Tiger Shark. Very big with it's torpedo head full of sharp jagged teeth, if it swam up behind you unseen with-in feet like they do, suddenly turning around it might require Surgery to extract your Testicles. Funny but regardless how scary they are there's never been a recorded attack on a Human of any kind, Our Perceptions.

Nice pun in title

😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😢😮😮😢😮😮😢😢😅😮😮😮😮😮

Quality content and without unnecessary background music when you talking (which I am not so fund of)
I also think you have a high skill of explanation.

Bahahahahahaaaaaaaa. 🤣

No more than atheist apologetics in the above video. Here is the truth the following...

Evolution is not happening! The following is very well scientifically reasoned…
Is evolution really happening?

What was the evidence it was happening?

It was observed adaptations to new environments and diets along with bacteria and viruses becoming antibiotic or body defense resistant. These were ASSUMED and taught examples of evolving DNA mutations. Was this assumption right for all these decades? No. In 2014, a pro-evolution scientist named Dr. Michael Skinner set out to MATERIALLY prove by his scientific method these adaptations were evolution-derived by naturally selected DNA mutations. Did he? No. He found they were epigenetic-derived adaptations. He did this as he used the model subject of the Darwin’s Finches. His paper said a variety of organisms returned this same conclusion. This was a surprise the scientific community.

Do you know where your gene expression comes from? It comes from your ordinary epigenome. It’s been there all along. It’s actions are called ‘epigenetics’. Evolutionary scientists asserted its adaptation ability only lasted for a couple generations and then resets. Therefore, the teaching of evolution doing these adaptations was set in place. Dr. Skinner MATERIALLY found the epigenome was under-credited. It turned out to be HUNDREDS of generations. This was finally credited as a fact of the epigenome capabilities in 2014.

What is the difference between materially vs. theoretical? Materially means factually found. Something theoretical is proposed by inferences. This material finding of it is epigenetic for adaptations disproves the inferences for mutation-derived adaptations. The epigenomes of all life is already existent before any environment or diet change. Same with bacteria and viruses in response to antibiotics. Also from body defenses. THEIR epigenomes, epigenetically adapts, too.

The ASSUMPTION of antibiotic resistance being an example of evolution by evolving mutations are now found to be smoke and mirrors.

Here is an analogy. Would it make no sense if a student completely flunks basic math and algebra but gets straight A’s in geometry and physics? Of course not. Conversely the theory of evolution is the same way. Since the theory of evolution flunks the basics…of adaptations by mutations being found wrong then why give it credit for getting all of the proposed advanced macroevolution claims correct? Epigenetic modifications are without DNA mutations…these adaptations are wrongly called ‘microevolution’ for all these decades! The ‘little steps of microevolution’ does not create the larger pictured macroevolution mind-constructs such as whales evolving from a land animal, birds from dinosaurs, or humans evolving from hominids.

So what about mutations? With supposed ‘microevolution’ being taken away, the trait differences mutations will give such as speciation and other aspects, are evolution-impertinent. A sleight of hand and a non-sequitur. These effects from mutations fit the intelligent design predictive model. Genome degeneration effects are different from the epigenome-derived adaptations. Evolutionary scientists have been equating the two as being the same but are now seen as being logistically different. Genome degeneration has been called ‘microevolution’ but is not.

The assertions of degeneration causing long term evolutionary generation is reduced to being ridiculous comic book science. It's Ninja Turtle material.

Why hadn’t the proponents of evolution abandoned the theory in 2014? They did not but said this new third aspect of epigenetics possibly contributed to the molecular evolution by mutation. Possible. In evolutionary theory it is supported by words like…may, could, infer, derive, possible, model, assume…and others. It means they are stuck with the theoretical after the finding of adaptations are materially proven to be by epigenetics. Epigenome-derived in other words without the evolutionary ‘engine’ of DNA mutations and natural selection. Natural selection is found here to be selecting these epigenome-caused adaptations so logistically, it is of an intelligent design signature. Natural selection does not even save the theory of evolution.

THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION IS NOT NEEDED to explain adaptations. Epigenome-derived adaptations are logistically from intelligent design.

This guy looks like Normal Al Yankovic

Very clear. Well presented. Video brilliant, have you written a book?

bigger animals have more offspring? 7min15s

Evolution🙏🤭🤣

do you know of any good resources that goes into more detail about the transition between sponge larvae and cnidaria, and the transition between cnidaria and all of bilateria?

I really like your channel but u made a mistake: larger animals don’t have more offspring; in fact u have it opposite. Some fish and frogs will lay 100 eggs or more whereas an elephant usually has 1 baby at a time

So the polar bear became best friends with the baby seal and had crazy fun adventures, right? Right?

Outstanding presentation.

Dude I love the environment you are filming in, it increases the production value so much!

Im not a biology person(i think tierzoo is the only biology related channel i watch) so it was weird to see this video pop up for me, but after watching the series im glad to be a new sub. Very well made series, just the right amount of information for someone getting interested and easy to understand basics. Makes you think and ask questions about the subject which i guess is the goal of this type of education.

My biggest question is: how exactly did the first muscle develop? The evolutionary benefits of muscles are obvious so it makes sense why they appeared, but how? Was it a mutation like tumor? Also how did the first organisms with muscles survive before developing the support organs for them?

Me: Preparing to sleep
YT Recommendations: literaly hours of realy userful n interesting content

I am not sure I shoulda watched that ... my stomache is heaving!

Large animals have more offspring.....What?

Evolution ?!? Don't make me laugh. Some crappy 160 "theory" which explains nothing.

Great content, I'm very pleased at how in-depth without drowning you're being on these videos. Looking forward to the next release. In the meantime, you've got another sub.

How much do I dislike the 'side on shot' in videos. It is just poor film making because it loses the connection with the speaker and irritates even if subconsciously. The method is just a film/video school fad to try and deal with the problem of face on presentations in videos like this. But it doesn't work. It has never worked and no-one actually says anything about it. Subscribed none-the-less as this content is superb.

Great content. Subscribed.

So no head?

"larger animals tend to produce more offspring"
Ahhhh not sure about that one. Sure, a turtle lays more eggs in a clutch that a mouse's litter, and large birds tend to lay more eggs, but this breaks down on numerous levels.
A mouse still reproduces much faster than a turtle, and while dinosaurs may have laid scads of eggs, this is because they couldn't lay bigger ones for physics reasons. And small fish often lay hundreds of their own eggs.
I'm just not sure size is that important compared to other factors when talking about number of young...

Literally bio 111 at CMU

Great video!

Question: Will there be an “evolution of plants” series after this one?

evolution theory is so retarded

wtf is that cladogram lol

You have to know that For Merck standards this is already Against Nature®

Excellent Program. Been looking for this years! Thank you for this great compolation.

How to Get Ahead.


Honestly. It was right there.

Fascinating video though...

This is a really great video! It really does a good job of making me understand the why and how of how animals evolved.

videos with discussions of how structures in a body, such as the mesoderm, bones, blood, etc appeared and evolved into current structures would be interesting

The freshwater flatworms are so derpy.

Good lord this is informative. Thanks.

Very high quality content. I'm surprised not having stumbled on this channel before.

it's pronounced CAP-ill-ar-ies, not ca-PILL-ar-ies.

This channel will blow up

So glad Ron Jeremy got into educational content.

I've just discovered your channel. As an author of fantasy a better understanding of evolution always helps a lot with world building. And you do a great job explaining!

Migraine warning for the intro animations.

This is a great series and I appreciate the very specific focus on the development of specific organ systems and phylogenetic trees so the viewer doesn't get lost. But. I think you should continually reïterate that evolution continues in each branch of the tree, including convergence. For e

Something that people rarely think about is just is the idea that evolution is driven by an collective or outside intelligence, i think so atleast.

As there is no way in hell that random matter and atoms with no intelligence could build something advanced and intelligent as the laws of evolution.

This channel and your explanations are really a head of the curve. Even tho you don't have a huge amount of content yet, it seems like you're really headed in the right direction.

This was actually a fantastic video, you’re a natural educator, and I’m jealous of your mic quality