Комментарии:
This is disgustingly inaccurate and just not true.
Work in a market? Sure, 150 days. But to insinuate that they had all this extra time off and that we today are working way worse is totally false. Today it takes an average of 3 hours of labor to run a home for a week. In the 1930s, it was 65 hours. Thats still with electricity and the such. In the 800s-1500s? It's probably closer to 80 hours of labor, which is why women primarily stayed at home. Men would farm or work the hard laborous jobs like mining, charcoal making, etc. It was all hard. Not leisurely like this implies. Just pure false information.
Yeah sure😂
ОтветитьUhm. So they weren't tilling the snow?
Ответить150days for church 150 days for King and the rest for theyr own
ОтветитьAdding an air generated person? Why?
ОтветитьI never had a vacation, so everyone has had more holidays than me.
ОтветитьYou mean to tell me people worked 1/7 of a year?😂 Bruh.
ОтветитьI’d like to see you operate a farm working just 50 days a year 😂
ОтветитьAI is correct
No, medieval peasants did not consistently work less every year. While they did have periods of intense labor, particularly during planting and harvesting seasons, their work year was not uniformly shorter than a modern work year. Peasants worked according to the agricultural cycle, with more intense periods during planting and harvesting, and slower periods during winter. However, they also had to dedicate time to maintaining their homes, tending to livestock, and making clothing and tools, which meant there was not a large block of "free" time for mos
This is completely and utterly false
ОтветитьJeez, people really do not understand what people had to go through back then; Life is way easier nowadays.
Ответить