This is CRAZY! - TUNED Ultra 9 285K VS i9 14900K 40 GAMES TESTED

the really weak lows are not wondering me when you run 8600Mb/s.
would love to see a 12h Karhu or P95 large fft over night to see if this is even remotely stable.

now run both 14900K vs 285K vs earch other with 14900Ks SMT disabled !!! (SMT OFF) on 14900K (as 285K Doesnt have P core SMT 😭) illnever buy a CPU with out SMT

X3D all the way!!! 9800X3D ROCKS

@DannyzReviews
now run both 14900K vs 285K vs earch other with 14900Ks SMT disabled !!! (SMT OFF) on 14900K (as 285K Doesnt have P core SMT 😭) illnever buy a CPU with out SMT

Great stuff.

I really like your approach in testing. One thing that is in my opinion smart thing to do is to show games how they run not just to put a graph and that's it. One can say that you faked the graphs.

Intel must cut the price of i9 285k about 15% , no one should buy this CPU at current price

Intel needs more Time to search and build CPU's with better Technology.
14000 = Is the same as You Producing a 3000 ps car and Buyer must see how cooling this s*** 😂
Ultras are only a fast Answer for that Disaster! come on Intel! ❤

Hey man you seem like you might know the answer to this. If you had to choose between 9950x or 285k for work and gaming, which would you choose? I am hearing reports about input lag with the 285k, is this a thing? Has it been fixed?

😅Intel 3nm Burns up very very Quick if u OC Gaming it. Less then 3 year=it all burn up😂=Cancel Orders

Can you please make a video on how you tuned the 14900k 😊

Unreal bad performance with the new Intel against the old 14900!! Almost hard to believe and thanks for showing us them.

hmm why not a ryzen 7800x3d in ncomparsion here also?

This is ridiculous. 😵‍💫

Glad I got the 14900KS. Definitely still the top dog. Especially when it's tuned.

Why you have no overclocked the E-Core's??! My 245k is OC@[email protected] - [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@5.3-5.5Ghz-Ram@7715Mhz@Cl32-43 ( AIDA64 68NS Latency), with this settings,I' "destroy" a 14900k in default settings!! ( F1 24) The Core Ultra models need a little bit of tuning, good memory timings and speed... In a few months Microsoft and Intel have improvments,who will still get a few percent out of it,certainly....

What resolution you tested it please ?

Who the hell buys these new chips today to game at 1080p? The benchmarks are 1080p because that's the only way it's interesting. If the tests were at 1440p or 4K this wouldn't even be worth making a video because the scores would all be the same.

Damm the new 14900k is so much better than the old 285k, can't wait to see what performance the 15900k delivers

that is a pretty mobo

Wow, wtf ? feels like bankruptcy is on it's way with that performance. Why would anyone buy intel with performance similar to the 13th or 12th generation cpus ?

would highly recommend you to try the "framechasers" course if you are into fine tuning your pc ...............

Intel got too lazy and complacent. Full of DEI hires.

I have no idea why you would use e-cores enabled for games more power draw ,no gains in fps and some games still struggle with scheduling giving horrible dips.

Intel clearly gave up on gaming.

you missed JayZTwoCents CUDIMMS video would have been a much better test run for 285k

do you have a video of the exact tuning you did for the intel ultra 9. I didn't do my homework on this and didn't realize the negativity around this ultra 9. i would love to do this tuning! anyone help. new to the pc community

Intel was always and will always be productivity brand, if you really care about gaming buy AMD, intel was never meant for you.

why test it at 1080p? who plays at 1080p anyway?

what is the mean by tuned !!!

Bottom line, I'm gonna keep my 14900k. I don't care about power usage and all the nuances, I just care about raw performance with adequate cooling.

I find that the industry keeps pushing so much BS code that doesn't seem to actually add to quality of life in computing for the average user.
Like with my i9 7980xe Opera uses 4-5 cores now. This is rediculous.

Nice data. I have been trying to also support the benefits of the 14th gen with my waterblock/direct die comparison from a temperature standpoint. 14th gen CPUs are great platforms as long as you can keep them cool...and its definitely possible. Thank you for your work with this comparison.

Why do you have painting tape on your IHS.

Anyone preparing for their next hardware upgrade in 6 years? ⤵️

You people are hilarious. For almost TWENTY YEARS articles, reviewers, and users complain Intel ran too hot, Intel was a power hog, Intel is too expensive.

Now you guys get a CPU with slightly less performance, using HALF the power, and it’s the coolest flagship Intel CPU… and you shit all over it—still.

I’m convinced reviews on all this hardware is a waste of time. Just give me a website with screenshots of your findings, I’m starting to mute videos like yours and just skip around looking for tiles anyway.

FWIW, I’m not some intel fanboi, I’m enjoying my 9800x3d. But these guys are just a hoot.

Windows 11 is pure garbage. Frame chasers and TechYEScity have proved it. Anyone on win 11 is losing performance across the board.

Would you please let us know about your tunning settings?

285k its better ,,, sorry ,,,4k its better

Would be interesting to see benchmarks using CUDIMM RAM

I mean, u are using ram that’s literally 1000MT faster on the 285k, but ok…

do the same test and use CUDIMM in 285K - Intel Ultra is the winner ;)

I'm glad that Intel's new offering didn't blow the socks off of my i9 14900KS, not that there's an easily perceivable difference in the overall performance, I'm just glad the KS is still the strongest performer. As a Custom PC builder with 35 years of building experience, I aim to sell all my in-stock CPUs before AMD or Intel debut their latest chip, for obvious reasons.
I really need to finish my 14900KS build before any new CPUs debut. I have two or three unfinished "spec" PC builds that I began building about 6 months ago, but I need more motivation to finish the spec builds since nobody's waiting on them.

Intel not in the game lol

Why running 23H2 without any fixes for 285K? 😂

I can't imagine "gaming" being the primary feature of a high end CPU, what a waste of time.

This newer chip is at the start of going in the proper direction. Lower watts and higher FPS should of been mandatory. It shouldn't be losing frames to an older cpu.

So 5.7 GHZ Against 4.2 GHZ??????

What about the intel i9 14900KS (not K) vs i9 Ultra Core?I can find no review online.

When I see CPU comparisons, they are always compared with gaming in mind. I'm not a gamer. I'm a 3D CAD modeler. How does Intels "Core Ultra" CPUs compare with i7/i9 14th Gen CPUs using software like Blender, UE5. and other AutoDesk programs like Revit?
Thx