What's Happening With Antimatter at CERN? Scientists Are Stumped Again

What's Happening With Antimatter at CERN? Scientists Are Stumped Again

Astrum

1 год назад

1,841,859 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@Alan-rt3se
@Alan-rt3se - 19.01.2025 03:37

I wonder if the initial moment of the big bang had matter go in one direction and antimatter go in the opposite direction, so that the bulk of the antimatter is on the opposite side of the universe, too far to be observed by us.

Ответить
@3D_Printing
@3D_Printing - 19.01.2025 21:06

Bang

Ответить
@FrankReddick
@FrankReddick - 19.01.2025 23:21

That is not how it works. Dumbed down, I expected. This wrong description (quantum chromodynamics is not even described properly)I did not expect. NOT RECOMMENDED.

Ответить
@damanybrown5036
@damanybrown5036 - 20.01.2025 10:21

The reason for the baryonic asymmetry of the universe is because of YHWH The Creator who knows how to design our universe so it is NOT self-destructive like we are

Ответить
@jonathanrys6921
@jonathanrys6921 - 21.01.2025 02:19

What happens when you do this experiment with normal hydrogen atoms? Do 100% of them fall out the bottom? Or do we need to build the whole test apparatus out of anti-matter to make that test work?
Does it do the same thing (in the other direction of course) if you flip the apparatus and run it upside down?
I've seen gravity visualized as a ball on sheet that creates a divot. Does that mean the gravitational constant is a function of the tension (how taut the sheet is) of space-time? Are there places where space-time could have more (or less) tension? Are there ways we can affect that tension? Let's say that space time is curved and all of space-time exists as a sphere(or a 3-sphere) with some other force keeping it in a bubble. Then we would have consistent tension everywhere and a force drawing things with mass toward it's center. Then wouldn't gravity be the effect of that force and not a force of its own?

Ответить
@ritof-rice
@ritof-rice - 23.01.2025 09:36

I love how we dont know almost anything yet, makes me excited to see what more we can learn

Ответить
@realbartlett8882
@realbartlett8882 - 25.01.2025 05:19

What happened when they ran the experiment with regular Hydrogen ?

Ответить
@crosstalk125
@crosstalk125 - 25.01.2025 17:52

The obsession with antiparticle makes me wonder if the guys at cern are real life embodiment of Darkseid or they worshipping or preparing to welcome him

Ответить
@Rinchen-ov4wy
@Rinchen-ov4wy - 29.01.2025 07:35

+
Amen 🌻💎🌲

Ответить
@karenfry5538
@karenfry5538 - 30.01.2025 00:34

If antimatter and matter behave so similarly, how do we know that other galaxies are not made of antimatter? Hoping for an answer

Ответить
@SupraSav
@SupraSav - 30.01.2025 03:28

What if cern was a portal to a demon realm in plain sight?

Ответить
@Edward-om8mz
@Edward-om8mz - 30.01.2025 22:34

❤IT

Ответить
@LolXD2321
@LolXD2321 - 06.02.2025 08:15

Is that Brian cox? AI?

Ответить
@AndyBushell-mm6cf
@AndyBushell-mm6cf - 07.02.2025 02:35

wow interesting

Ответить
@AndyBushell-mm6cf
@AndyBushell-mm6cf - 07.02.2025 02:42

if your left. handed. does. that. mean. people. could be. matter. anti-matter. if. your. correct. then. could. humans. have. both. with. dna

Ответить
@kevinjkelliher
@kevinjkelliher - 08.02.2025 13:56

the mass of both antimatter and matter is similarly affected by gravity. So gravity is not influenced much by the anti-ness of things. So what is this telling us about gravity?

Ответить
@tomshady3530
@tomshady3530 - 11.02.2025 06:00

Call me a noob, but gravity isnt a thing. It is a warping of time in space by mass, that only appears to be a force. Using force to counteract time may not mean much to anti-electrons, which may be why "counteracting gravity" did not yield the perfect curve they expected. Just like using a magnet on the moon would not effect its orbit. I would be interested what anti electrons would do at 0 kelvin. I suspect heat is a factor.

Ответить
@santafemikez9694
@santafemikez9694 - 12.02.2025 07:14

I love all your content but this one is way over my head.

Ответить
@entropiusvictor2739
@entropiusvictor2739 - 13.02.2025 22:29

Is the anti hydrogen diatomic? Was the experiment conducted with regular hydrogen, if possible?

Ответить
@Jay9999
@Jay9999 - 14.02.2025 04:38

Men and woman are as opposite as antimatter and matter. One is chaos and nonsense and the other is logic and common sense

Ответить
@bharatrawat5909
@bharatrawat5909 - 15.02.2025 12:57

I work at AEGIS

Ответить
@alimehdi8878
@alimehdi8878 - 21.02.2025 22:23

What if after big bang anti matter universe is also expanding but in opposite direction so we can't observe it much in our matter universe.

Ответить
@r.davidsen
@r.davidsen - 24.02.2025 11:24

Technically, there is no such thing as matter. It's all energy. When a photon, which has no mass and consists of pure kinetic energy, splits into an electron and a positron, they are just two more highly dense fields of energy than the photon. The difference in density creates mass and charge. That's it. So, in other words, there are just different forms of energy. E=mc^2 is the same as saying that when energy is not traveling at the speed of light, the reduction in speed makes the energy unstable and binds itself into other configurations with different properties.

Ответить
@bradpaul9718
@bradpaul9718 - 27.02.2025 05:05

We are all gonna die real soon, man !!!! Please save yourselves before it's too late !!!! It can't be stopped, not this time!!! A secret portal has been discovered by Google Willow, and now they can't close it back up!!!! It is slowly sucking Earth into it. We only have two years left to live!!! Spend more time with friends and family!! Google Willow was shut down because of it

Ответить
@helifynoe1034
@helifynoe1034 - 27.02.2025 15:18

E=mc2. So we have mass and energy, matter and anti-matter. So what is anti-energy ?

Ответить
@leeofallon9258
@leeofallon9258 - 01.03.2025 09:29

Antimatter and gravity definitely show a correlation but why?

Ответить
@Acousticeg
@Acousticeg - 03.03.2025 02:57

It's good to know ,that there are things we can never know...Mystery is is the inspiration of imagination.

Ответить
@lilnova9661
@lilnova9661 - 07.03.2025 21:52

I'm mad gravity doesn't react opposite for antimatter 😂

Ответить
@rach8241
@rach8241 - 09.03.2025 06:30

In the quest to know everthing. They know nothing. Our intelligence is like an ant trying to work out a skyscraper if he looked up.

Ответить
@TomHendricksMusea
@TomHendricksMusea - 15.03.2025 20:16

Where is the Hidden Anti Matter? Maybe it is in Plain Site.

My theoretical model suggests where the anti matter is. Further if correct, that opens a door to multiple discoveries about the makeup and characteristics of protons, neutrons, and hydrogen atoms! Then I show how recent research supports my neutron model.
SUMMARY IS AT THE END

Start with this: Suggestion that Photons, that are outside of space - time, are the eternal singularity that existed before the Big Bang. These photons, made the first mass as electrons and positrons, through pair conversion.. This started space-time.
The positrons made in the Big Bang era are the missing anti matter but where are they?

Most electrons and positrons in the Big Bang annihilated into photon energy. These photons expanded the universe as dark energy.

That expansion also cooled the universe. That led to a lower temperature that may have kept some of the few remaining electron positron pairs from annihilation. They instead made up stable protons, neutrons, and the first atoms of hydrogen.

Here's how electron and positron pairs made protons, neutrons, and hydrogen atoms. SEE DRAWING

Protons in my model, are made up of two positrons and one electron. This gives a charge of exactly plus one - that matches the electron's minus one charge. Proton = (E+ , E-, E+).

Neutrons in my model, are made up of one proton plus one electron. This gives them a charge of exactly zero. (E+, E-, E+) plus E-.

The hydrogen. atom is the same as the neutron. One proton, plus one electron. The electron here is in a more stable position than the electron in the neutron.

Washington Universeity, 9 17 2007. "Research overturns accepted notion of neutron's electrical properties":
Using precise data recently gathered at three different laboratories and some new theoretical tools, Gerald A. Miller, ... Has found that the neutron has a negative charge both in it's inner core and it's outer edge, with a positive charge sandwiched in between to make the particle electrically neutral.

The MISSING MATTER is in the PROTONS AND NEUTRONS!!

Here are some answers to questions I often get.

The two positrons are in a single orbital. Like two electrons in a single orbital, the two positrons in my model should have opposite spin and orbit in opposite directions. They should be able to coexist and have no magnetic field. Therefore they should not annihilate with the electron in the extreme conditions of the Big Bang era when virtually all protons were made.

Protons are extremely strange particles, and can only be made in the extreme conditions of the Big Bang. There is no way to make new protons, though neutrons can break down into proton, electron, and an antineutrino in beta minus decay.

My model suggests neutrons and hydrogen atoms both have the exact same make up of one proton and one electron. But then why are they so different in characteristics?

The neutron is in an unstable form, and outside of the nucleus, decays within 10 minutes. But inside an atom's nucleus it is stable.

Therefore in the nucleus of an atom, the neutron has to bond with a proton for stability. Suggestion that the reason why, is that the neutron's outer electron helps bind the two particles together in the nucleus of an atom. That suggests that for just about every nucleus, any proton has to be paired with a neutron as well. (Excluding simple hydrogen.)

The neutron is more stable when it is paired with a proton in a nucleus.
The hydrogen atom may be more stable than the neutron; because of the position of the electron.

Why don't you need quarks? Problems with quarks is a separate video. Please see my other videos also for more on how protons and neutrons bond to build up a nucleus.

SUMMARY
This theoretical model ...

Shows where the missing matter is - it's in protons, and neutrons.
Shows how protons were made in Big Bangs extreme temperatures from electrons and positrons.
Shows how a neutron is unstable combination of a proton and electron.
Shows how a neutron and hydrogen atom are the same configuration but have different characteristics.
Shows why the proton has exactly Plus One total charge, and why the neutron has exactly ZERO total charge.
Shows the reason for beta decay.
Shows support for the neutron model from the 2007 paper.

Thanks for reading!

Ответить
@hx2415
@hx2415 - 20.03.2025 06:44

I feel like i can time travel

Ответить
@timothy8426
@timothy8426 - 20.03.2025 18:24

Anti-matter is heat and cold that don't touch one to the other. They neutralize magnetism in equalization to pressure of forced currents flowing through and around mass as repulsion and grounding currents. External heat energy outside of entanglement of mass doesn't ground currents hence hot air balloons are anti magnetism grounding hot air rises up through earth's internal magnetic field as anti repulsion to heat propulsion faster than planetary internal magnetic fields grounding currents. Heat is independent of cold space as motion momentum velocity of constant cosmic speed limit in repulsion as perpetual motion momentum velocity of normal space at maximum distance traveling through space and mass. Distance is the variable force of liquidity infinity to illusionary solidity of liquidity infinity as mass. There is unification of unidirectional currents flowing through and around mass. Repulsion is always equal to the force of pressure and distance traveling cycling circulation centrifugal force. There is no negative force or positive force. Unification of unidirectional currents flowing through and around in equalization to magnetism repulsion within and without entanglement of mass. Cern collider is disrupting earth's internal magnetic field grounding currents through its nucleus or core where external heat energy is strongest currents flowing like the current in a rapidly moving river flowing currents quickly. The shallows and the middle are distance affecting pressure. Magnetism works for physics. Mass occupies space within mass as outward force of pressure known as weightless outside of a greater magnetic field like standing in the shallows or out of the river. No currents or minimum force of pressure. Fire is external magnetic fields disolving mass into external heat energy outside of entanglement of mass as fire currents releases heat energy outside of entanglement of mass. The closer to the core the greater the force of pressure. The more distance away the less force of pressure flow. Everything around us is currents of liquidity infinity as illusionary solidity of liquidity infinity currents flowing of heat as fire. Generators are event horizon perimeters spinning heat faster than planetary internal magnetic fields grounding currents. Electricity is rapid heat generators through mass faster than planetary internal magnetic fields. Lightning disolving atmospheric gasses instantaneously disolving atmospheric gases into external heat energy and open unoccupied space itself behind unoccupied and atmospheric gases surrounding the void slamming shut on the void as thunder resonates outwardly force as pressure equalization as heat or fire is expelled outward into occupational space as atmospheric gasses. In space the void created by exploding away their heat energy from stars is to weak to fill the void. You now have a sphere of absolute zero heat energy within its core where space used to be occupied by mass as stars. Hence a external magnetic field created by repulsion to heat that can only collect around these spheres of monopoles of pure fabric of cold space repulsion to heat. Magnetism explains everything about physics without gravity and bending space and electricity.

Ответить
@nastybadger-tn4kl
@nastybadger-tn4kl - 21.03.2025 06:57

CERN is a BIG PYRAMID SCHEME!

Ответить
@gaius68
@gaius68 - 21.03.2025 15:41

Fascinating video - taught me more about antimatter. Thanks for sharing.

Ответить
@ChristopherLePage-o2f
@ChristopherLePage-o2f - 22.03.2025 03:48

Sure; Why not...🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Ответить
@Danielspacex
@Danielspacex - 23.03.2025 16:52

I just want the warp core created in my lifetime 😅

Ответить
@dejaliloquy
@dejaliloquy - 25.03.2025 08:25

I didn't know about the asymmetry that's very interesting

Ответить
@cobar5342
@cobar5342 - 26.03.2025 11:27

As long as anti-matter obeys the Laws of Star Trek I will be OK

Ответить
@sorenveneratio8806
@sorenveneratio8806 - 26.03.2025 18:59

I've been under the impression that antimatter and Matter are in about the same amount just hidden. Protons made of matter and neutrons made of antimatter and between them the strong force is exchanged via a meson rather than a gluon. And within each the weak force which changes an up quark into a down quark borrows energy from its neighbouring quark this imbalance is what keeps a proton from decaying and the same interaction happens in neutrons. And when a electron or proton is introduced to the system with enough energy to overpower the electromagnetic force creates what we see as the beta decay of partciles which ultimately can lead to the alpha particle decay. Something about the qua Then whatever excess energy remains in the system is emitted via gamma decay.

Sounds wild but Mathmetically it fits everything perfectly and replaces the idea of gluons and the binding energy and paripheral binding energy of a gluon. It would also explain why chirality of particles is effected differently by the Weak force

Ответить
@CaptainKirk1963
@CaptainKirk1963 - 26.03.2025 19:43

I wonder if antimatter can coaless somehow, someway, in the vacuum of space. Possible accounting for dark energy or dark matter. It would certainly be easier to test gravity with a mass of it.

Ответить
@justinacolmena
@justinacolmena - 27.03.2025 11:55

Antimatter positrons that destroyed a tumor of malignant ovarian cancer that had metastasized into an even more malignant melanoma with severe leukemia. Many years had elapsed since doctors who were wicked and unskilled with the knife were refused the opportunity to operate by dollars-and-cents-minded hospital administrators who were a little too quick to absolve themselves of civil liability to accredit them good faith.

Ответить
@Trizzer89
@Trizzer89 - 29.03.2025 05:13

Is it possible that the anti-strong force is weak?

Ответить
@Trizzer89
@Trizzer89 - 29.03.2025 05:18

If they antiparticle gravity is super strong, I guess they could all be black holes

Ответить
@Trizzer89
@Trizzer89 - 29.03.2025 05:27

If gravity is weaker, then they would go out from the big bang faster and all the antimatter is beyond the universe of regular matter

Ответить
@АндрейБ-у4ю
@АндрейБ-у4ю - 31.03.2025 13:45

Strong force affects antimatter the opposite way than the usual matter. That you also need to consider is that time also affects antimatter the opposite way, so the effect negates.

Ответить
@chaycooper5923
@chaycooper5923 - 02.04.2025 22:12

Well I guess there goes antigravity....

Ответить
@scriptles
@scriptles - 05.04.2025 20:41

This is terrifying actually....

You can trap Positrons.... which means you can have antimatter... which means you could put the fear of God into God himself with an antimatter bomb that would be well over 1 million times more powerful then the nukes we dropped on Hiroshima... If you made one that was as big as Tsar Bomba was originally going to be at 100 mega tons the resulting BOOM would be equal to 1.7 gigatons not 100 megatons. The boom would destroy anything in a 1 mile radius, the shockwave would wrap the Earth 3+ times... the world would feel earthquakes and tsunamis everywhere. I don't think people understand just how powerful antimatter is and were just here like yes lets play with it... If you could harness the energy of Antimatter you could have UNLIMITED power.. Like Nuclear Fusion is or was the Holy Grail but no no no my friend Antimatter really is.

Ответить
@ΝίκοςΣτεργίου-δ4κ
@ΝίκοςΣτεργίου-δ4κ - 06.04.2025 21:38

Very interesting and informative video thank you!

Ответить