Комментарии:
Well the private text messages that Blake Lively released have been deemed to be doctored because she deleted the context of at least 18 different text messages where she praised Justin
ОтветитьBlake Lively went to Sony and told them she wanted to write her movie Justin wanted to write his movie then she told Sony if you don't let me write my movie and edit it the way I want I will sue you claiming sexual harassment from Justin. Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds and maybe even Taylor Swift are going to be fucked in the defamation lawsuit
ОтветитьSo Blake Lively with Megan of the New York Times set up this whole smear campaign against Justin in 12/12 before she even filed her lawsuit in 12/21
ОтветитьThey CNN alleged that the veteran ran a black market operation not a Black Ops. And the definition of Black Market is an illegal underground Market
ОтветитьLet's be honest journalist and reporters do not care if the story is true it's all about the speculation and it's about selling papers or content or getting viewers on the station to watch. The United States journalism is nothing but speculated propaganda
ОтветитьGetting the New York Times believe Amber Heard
ОтветитьWhat in the AI questions was that NYT interview!? So scripted! So annoying to listen to. Very convenient for them.
ОтветитьCant back track now NewYork times. Pay up!
ОтветитьTo be a fly on the wall when chatting with their PR and attorneys...
ОтветитьNo body is just sticking up for Justin we just don't believe her bs and gaslighting now. I literally didn't care about the movie because the star in it .. husband n wife both play themselves in movies loved traveling 👖, but not 🫖girl!! Both same mean 👗 bs not acting n during p® statements
ОтветитьMe. Baldoni seems so frigging genuine it makes my heart ache for him.
And Blake seems unfortunately really transparent. I’m sad to say I feel like I know exactly why she did this- she either caught feelings for him or her husband became sort jealous and maybe accusatory so to cover it she claimed it was all elaborate abuse. So she isn’t at fault for anything, hubby can’t be mad if she claims she’s a victim. Ugh. I hate it.
I hope that justice prevails. And I truly hope everyone involved is able to heal.
I really believe if lively would of just been little more humble and taken a step back to think. When everyone was first seeing her do all these old interviews and new interviews being rude. She should of just apologized and taken accountability for her part in being wrong. If she would of did that instead of then going to the press to bash Justin I feel things would of gone a lot different for her. She thinks she is on top of the world and can’t do that. Her PR people sucks because I would of had her do that instead of making things way worse. Did they really believe Justin wasn’t going to come back with the truth! Blake thought she could ruin him to make herself look better. Hurting other people doesn’t help you be seen in a better light especially if your wrong.
ОтветитьThanks for this video. This is my first foray into what the NYT’s involvement was…and it f’ing stinks of the worst journalism. Don’t get me wrong…I love the NYT and am still a fan, but whoever was specifically involved in this…if I was one of the good journalists at the NYT who covers topics outside the drama of Hollywood? I would be f’ing FURIOUS. Their involvement looks like the fury I expect of the vast majority of good cops when they get lumped in with the few bad apples. CHRIST…you can tell the they’re already doing damage control. 14 hours…standard operating practice…. Are you f’ing kidding me? I get why you want to give a short response time to catch liars off guard, but is that really fair (or helpful if your real aim is the truth)? You’ve basically given the accuser the upper hand without hearing the other side of the story. And why? Because if you don’t…you lose not the real story, you lose not the award-winning journalism, you lose first out of the gate sensationalism. F y’all for that.
ОтветитьHow come they’re now calling it misconduct I thought she was suing for sexual harassment?
Also the NY times it seems has built this brand of protecting women and destroying men and they’re doing it at any costs. Not Justin though
All this while NYT keep winning lawsuits against them. I'm desperately hoping they lose this time and need to pay all JB's legal expenses
ОтветитьJUSTIN HAS THE RIGHT TO DEFIND HIMSELF....AND HE'S GOT ALL THE RECEIPTS....
ОтветитьThis journalist was sneaky. She didn’t give Justin’s team time to respond to her hit piece. She had been working on this article with BL for a few months ( cozy chats I’m sure) but she only contacted Justin for his side on the Friday bEfore Christmas just prior to the article coming out. Either way RR and BL are done in the court of public opinion- the Supreme Court of their careers.
Ответить@2.42, Megan Twohey, is hinting that the Blake backlash may have been, "seeded", I assume means that someone in Justin's team, had planted or created a small message in technology/electronic form, or written in letters, or informal conversation right? A comment to suggest that Blake was in the wrong, and with the notion in mind that the ppl on social media, or the online news format, which went viral with more and more talk of anti Blake rhetoric, pro Justin stories, and as part of the documented 17 point allegations that Blake did not want to go back to filming, or promote the film, if they refused to acquiesce. One of those points being of course the "non retaliation", clause. In effect, a "I/We can make changes and reports/ extra accusations as much as we want to and you aren't allowed to say anything. Even as self defense. Is that correct or have I misunderstood?
@9.52, 14 hours to respond to a complaint turned lawsuit, during Chrismas week. And THEN, with the fires with so much liss of life, home, work etc, when Blake and NYT, refused to extend a deadline, when the attorney for Justin lost his home and office, with files and other documents. Disgusting.
Bull, NYT!
ОтветитьNYT, means nothing! You cannot, trust anything they say!!!
ОтветитьI think Justin should have asked Zoe Kazan to play Lily as she has a much more naive, innocent and whimsical look about her which is something Blake does not possess. She is also less drama, would have read the book and accurately portrayed Lily.
ОтветитьPR Jonesy gave em the text from P R Ables confiscated phone. 🎉🎉
ОтветитьI would love to be a fly on the wall in Ryan and Blake's home 😆
Ответить❤❤❤❤❤
ОтветитьBlake and Ryan started a smear campaign against Justin because of the backlash she was getting online.
She also did not get her way, (completely) so she claimed SA.
She got her way a lot though, you’d think that would be enough for her but she is clearly one of those people who takes even more, the more she has already been given.
Disgusting.
Ryan has also acted very unprofessionally to protect his wife from fictitious SA.
hope Justin win and the judge give him more than 400 million the bullies has to be stopped
ОтветитьIsn’t she the one who wrote that article in the first place?
ОтветитьIt just gets better and better. I almost feel guilty for feeling that it's this satisfying. But then I don't.
ОтветитьOhhh I hope so!!
ОтветитьIv sent a few of your videos to Bryan Freedman regarding the Metadata. I so hope that he sees this
ОтветитьGood Job 👏
ОтветитьWhat about Disney firing Ryan Reynold from his character. I have ‘not seen any of his films because they’re all the same…. Att the same time Ryan’s ex wife came out with some really bad news about him…. She has also documents and texts ….
ОтветитьMeghan Twohey thought she had another Weinstein on her hand.Her NYT article was tainted by her previous e perience.She thought another great fame was on her way with film rights,books etc
ОтветитьI have lost all respect for Megan Twohey.
ОтветитьThe NYT is full of shit, they know they are going to lose big snd have to pay out, especially if Blake loses her suit, so they are throwing in behind her to try and deflect blame of the genuine negative press against Blake. They’e not only guilty, they know it and they’re trying to cover it up.
ОтветитьTeam Justin !!!!
ОтветитьDid they know why Baldonys lære was??
ОтветитьIts Ryan eho hates him ,he is so much paicent with insecure and difficilt wonwn
ОтветитьI honestly think she thot she genuinely thot she was americas sweetheart & also rr wife, we will be believed, Justin's anobody
ОтветитьMegan Twohey was the reporter conspiring with Blake LIvely to set up a FALSE sexual harassment case for $$$. Follow the money and you'll see she was paid and wanted browny points with Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively
ОтветитьWhy cannot these people see that it's not a smearing campaign, people simply cannot stand Lively after listening to her talk for more than 10 mins. I noticed this side of Lively years ago when she did a Vogue 30 questions series and insulted the journalist with comments like "you mom did not teach you right".
ОтветитьMeghan Twohey is a NYT anti Justin shill. She's lying and she knew Blake was lying, or just didn't care.
ОтветитьWhos gives them a deadline?
ОтветитьTwoohey was an arrogant reporter who thought that she could get away with her bias reporting, Her credibility just got thrown out the window and this will disgusting act of her will be remembered for a long time No one now will contact her or team up with her for future writings
ОтветитьMeghan Twohey wiped away all her credibility as a journalist with her NY Times article. Very careless and sloppy.
ОтветитьWe know blake lively lied. Blake created her own bad publicily because she was so tone deaf on what the movie was about instead of a big beautiful summer movie grab your florals grab ur friends drink my booze buy my hair care products. She wasn't promoting the movie she was promoting Herself.
ОтветитьLively reminds me of a MeToo con artist we have down in Oz. Her name is Brittany Higgins!
ОтветитьWatch the movie She Said: Meghan two hey is one of the main characters there. 😂
ОтветитьCircling back, Megan has done it again!!! I wonder if she’s going to get depose? And if Blake is going to sue her?
Ответить