NEW Theory Explains Black Hole Singularity vs. Big Bang Singularity | Neil Turok

It sounds painfully like berath

Every sell in your sole will spread then reform 😢

You know toe?

Just feel it dont think it 😊

You want control ?

There are no singularities.
There is a surface at event horizons. The phase change from aggregate to singular surface<<<<<

Neutron decay cosmology.
Inevitable.

Control

Almost like the terms are describing different things and the physics are questionable for half the described events and phenomena

Wow 😢 what he said🤔👍👌

It allredy exhausting

Considering ...Analysis(break-down)/Synthesis(build-up) along with Systems (integrative)/Statistical (differentiative).... thinkings moving into a Sciento-progressive thinking coming forth and going forward to embrace and engage our God-gifted Humanity.

Certainly

Bined them all together 🙏

So what's you're thought on this black hole sh!t?

Plus don't hold back mate

3Blue1Brown, please help us see what he is talking about…

Gravity ❤

Curt please look into Ashton Forbes work on MH370.

Neil should first find the equations for his prediction and from the equations deduce what is really going on. His assumptions might be wrong because he is imposing his own ideas on the real world, which does not need to make any sense to us until we found the equations and deduce the truth from the equations.

Dub step? I live in a dub step bubble. Wha wha wha wha wha…no. Tempo? None. Just, wha… aaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Ish. Continues. No start, singularity, imo. Maybe in a collider🙄, not in reality.😮 Atom gets bored. Black hole sounds like fun.

Hello, This video highlights why QM and Cosmology is in crisis, due to physicists keep trying to mathematically uphold ideas in the past that do not work. Forget the mathematics for a while, along with all of the theories trying to dfend the standard model and start again and only accept things that can fit logically in the first instant.

The whole concept of black holes as described in this video is a contradiction in terms and wrong.
The centre of a black hole is said to be an area of immense gravity, HOW? Nothing makes sense. If there was an incredibly strong force of gravity at the centre of a black hole, there would not be an event horizon, as all of the matter surrounding the black hole would be drawn in and a new star would be formed, it is mathematical nonsense.
The same applies to the description of a black hole being formed by a supernova casting off its outer layer and the core collapsing under its own gravity, to form the centre of a black hole. This again is mathematical nonsense. There are many celestial bodies in the universe that are not active stars with an outward pressure, but they do not collapse into bodies of immense gravity, they are just normal baryonic matter like our earth.
Forget the maths for a moment and look at it logically. Gravity is a product of mass and has nothing to do with bending of space. If a star explodes, the whole star and all of its matter will be expelled into space, along with all of its gravity, leaving an area where the star was void of aggregate matter, an area devoid of matter will have no gravity, and result in a black hole.
Because the star would have been rotating, the resulting debris from the exploded star would also continue to rotate, and all of the matter would be forced out by centrifugal force, but also each of the pieces of matter would be trying to coagulate into larger masses. Add to this the 'Dark Energy ' produced by ' Dark Matter ', which I propose consists of a cloud of negatively charged Monopole particles, which permeate the whole of the universe, will be pushing the Baryonic matter back inwards.
A balance is reached where there will exist an embryonic galaxy of varying pieces of matter, which over billions of years will accrete more matter and grow, the larger masses forming new stars, and at the centre there will exist a basic vortex of empty space except for the ' Dark Matter ' producing the negative repulsive force of ' Dark Energy '.
This is more fully explained in a recently published book called ' The Two Monopole Particle Universe by ' Tony Norman Marsh '. If you type Tony Norman Marsh into google, details will be shown. If you can supply me with an email address, I will send you a copy of my manuscript for your perusal, or it can be viewed quickly on ‘ Kindle ‘. Kind regards,
Tony Marsh.

Isn’t this philosophy of mathematics rather than physics?

Difference between big bang and black holes are we are inside the big bang black hole - it is only a name for our observable universe and history, not the rest of the universe, unperceivable to us because it is expanding (beyond the CMB) faster than the speed of light.... which possibly makes it travel backwards through time... or to us, coming towards from the "end" (essentially meaning we are the ones going backwards, travelling FTL in the singularity bubble).

For quantum tunneling... think of it as the odds that a path will align between the myriad of vibrating atoms.... almost impossible, but not quite.

sadly I can't do the math, yet understand it better than most teachers.

glad you are still having people like Dr. Turok on here. and there was a paper recently suggesting the electric universe explains the black holes better than our current models (terrence howard might be right brother, i know u are in that resistive phase)

Would love if he had explained how you can be under/within the event Horizon of a black hole and by some miracle you can move at faster than the speed of light to survive edging away from falling in to the singularity. What does that even mean that you can come out the other side . ?

GR — QM

That's the required "unification" in the art of data-fitting.

And, all being one, it can be done I'm sure.

But, like so much in public discourse, the general framing of the discussion/objective tends to exclude deeper, or more fundamental areas.

I have come to enjoy the modeling more and more over the years, and sometimes, I can see when it paralells the physicality/mechanism.

I am going to have to spend a little more time with this and the googleduck.

On the one hand, I don't understand enough of the maths, and though tunneling is easy enough, the singularity differences puzzle the hell out of me.

Partly because "black holes" puzzle me too. Understanding the physicality involved is analogous to expecting mercury's precession to be accurately predicted by the guy who ran around the bars telling anyone who would listen that "earth ain't inna middle".

The headline properties of black holes (like quantum tunneling, and the probabilistic nature of matter) are expected when one inverts the threefold (matter, space, time) paradigm … but the dynamics get complex.

Black holes must have (way further in than the light horizon) a surface, the volume of which is true vacuum. None of the physicality of "empty space" which supports (is the sub-stance to) what are called the "fields" from which "matter" emerges.

In your inverted paradigm, model it as a sphere, likely with surface features (expect similarities to some BE condensate behaviours) but with nothing more than a radius to describe its volume. True solid "string matter" is what you will have to imagine, to get that into your model. Wrong, but maybe workable within your paradigm.

So not a singularity but a sphere. A core. With an insanely energetic surface.

But here, I expect mathematical modeling to break down, because the illusion of "time" is too much an emergent phenomenon to be useful. In this territory, as at the heart of all matter, the Moment rules.

Geocentricism was so much easier. Just one misunderstanding to correct instead of three ;)

To to unravel this mathematical conundrum, the coming paradigm shift looks essential, but "string matter" or "maximally "pressured unified fields" might seed the model with something useful.

Radiating themselves away … makes sense. Reflecting/redirecting matter elsewhere though … not a clue.

Hold my beer ;)

One of the greatest guys to have is the one and only;
Nassim Haramein .

Thank you.
This actually makes sense.

Could the black hole then be a type of worm hole? I wouldn't want to be the one who tried it btw 👀

Will this debate ever end? That is literally the only meaningful question left. The truth itself is no longer important.

Alabama 3

Its alright to be wrong😮

Wow

This makes a certain sense. So the 'singularity' is a quantum object that essentially displaces incoming matter, I.e. 'tunnels'to a different point in space time?

If you don’t know WTF you are talking about can you stf up!

Not Neil turok
Obviously the fkn weirdos in the comments

Spouting bullst helps nobody

Hey dude i really appreciate your work here. . Keep it up please because it might be more important than anyone could imagine... thank you friend!

Hey, 😄 receiving super cool Emails notifying always about new science shows, makes happy. How came it to the fight between the skypeople and the folks living above the Uranium Stones ... because it can longer live, let's you travel into the future 1second being in paradise and motivates you to move against hypnotising. Super funny happy birthday 🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂

Exactly what you'd predict from a simulation multiverse built by quantum consciousness, eh? You can do more than you think with black holes if you know the right codes in the right universes and are nice to Karma

Simulations only start at a beginning if they have not been run before. The Big Bang is the only version of the physical universe that had a beginning. After that, we just found the midpoint where entropy started winning and ran a few generations before and after the midpoint till we found a set of messiah characters that got us past the critical tipping point. This continued till we found a big Messiah character that pushed past the point where entropy ever won - that is now. That's why the universe keeps getting bigger and older the farther you look. Time for a Cosmic Jubilee to celebrate all the best and worst players before they get to go tinker with their own creative universes to try to raise their own family of gods and goddesses.

The solution requires adding the laws of reincarnation and Karma - spiritual physics. Black holes are more fully formed merkabas of lower level gods - spiritual Dyson Spheres.

Most people don't know that Einstein said that singularities are not possible. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" he wrote -
"The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of G.R. predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light."
He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A 2-axis graph illustrates the squared nature of the phenomenon, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. A "time dilation" graph illustrates the same phenomenon, it's not just time that gets dilated.
Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. It can be inferred mathematically that the mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. More precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. In other words that mass is all around us. This is the explanation for galaxy rotation curves/dark matter, the "missing mass" is dilated mass.
Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has recently been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter. In other words, they have normal rotation rates.

"Subtle point theory".. I like it. Reminds me of my own theory called "arbitrary functor theory"😄

My existence is like the quantum realm. I know things, but idk how I know.

Drivel.

I wish he / people would talk more about the Kerr paper on singularities or lack thereof how we usually think of them in black holes

Again watching this and Neil Turok is touching idea's similar to Brad Voorhees. I think Brad might be proven correct on a lot of his proposed theories, his BlackHole idea that our consciousness is competing with time on the BlackHole surface is insane but he could be right.

May I spice it with some God hypothesis? Whence God awakened to the betrayel of Satan, he wanted to blow up the whole universe! In such a way, rebirth and justice become possible through the mirror. This blow was delicately engineered. Blackholes were the vacuum cleaners of future entropy and blasting out the masses into the past. Just adding them some minor information which may be called karma or destiny. All these reverse shot masses reach up to beginning point (the mirror) to transform. Thus the heaven, hell and earth, all contained in one single naive chain: The domino effect of time. And satan and his followers will pay off. Cause all mirrors have two sides. One is reflective, one is quite dark.
*(Quran 101 - the Striking Hour)