Комментарии:
Illusive theory!
-by Lord Sri Ram
If only i could visualise in my head teleparallel gravity. :(
Ответитьcan we even imagine space time since it's basically in another dimension, 4d
ОтветитьNo, this is not.
ОтветитьOkay we can't see the string of newton but the problem still same when we even can't see the fabric of Einstein 😅
ОтветитьThat was also my theory once! But it was made before I was born. I made it with no information of this though. Trust!
ОтветитьIn the 3D view the lines should expand away the object so it’s not accurate! Fabric is the best example 🎉
ОтветитьYes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Finally!
ОтветитьYeah, I always thought it showing it on. The 2-D plane was weird because gravity affects all directions equally.
ОтветитьI definitely seen someone do this rep (ScienceClic) so like stop stealing 😂😂😂
ОтветитьIm still lost, wtf am i looking at?
ОтветитьNow put the square SO SMALL that we dont see them and put infinite time the amout you see
Ответить4D view in 3D world
ОтветитьI always wonder if I were to point my head down and go down continuously would the fabric of space interfere or stop me? How can it manipulate planets and not a regular object going straight north, or south, etc. this kind of makes sense.
ОтветитьYas 4 dimensions
ОтветитьHow does it work for “planet “ like Pluto which orbit in both vertical and horizontal way around the sun
ОтветитьI mean both have some proof behind them. The 2D version shows how massive they are by how much they are pressing down on the space time fabric causing the other objects to get pulled into orbit. I’m no expert so I’m wondering which is right myself.
ОтветитьBut what about super heavy objects like neutron stars and black holes? It seems like with this visualization we quickly max out the amount of bending and warping that space can do. It can only pull in so close to the object itself. In 2D representation, they show a massive drop like a wind sock for a black hole. I see that’s the opposite of this, with it warping away from the mass. I’m having trouble seeing how it should be in 3D
ОтветитьEarth is an enclosed system. Space is fake.
ОтветитьScienceclic English
ОтветитьThis is how i actually imagined lol, more than 1 layer of fabric of space and time
ОтветитьThis is not the actual representation because the fabrics need to be pulled constantly into the object that disturb it
ОтветитьI always wanted to see this one.
ОтветитьI cannot understand the concept here😢
ОтветитьSo the object doesn't push fabric downwards like trampoline. It gets squeezed and pulls toward objects? Right? Plz anyone explain 😢
ОтветитьFAITH IS IN EVERTHING THANK YOU JESUS
ОтветитьBut why Galaxy and solar system spiral Flat
ОтветитьIt is harder to understand the latter simulation. That's why they show the first one, it's just easier to understand that way.
ОтветитьHoly shit, the comments makes me laugh. everyone thinks they’re an expert huh?
ОтветитьThere is no fabric, I will solve it
ОтветитьI really appreciate these visualization for those whose eager to learn ❤
But let me remind everyone it not the exact yet because we still have 'time' and we're still figuring out how to represent a 4D continuum in a 3D world visualizing most studies in 2D.
Great one!
I don’t get yall, I literally se lines going away how is it accurate.
ОтветитьStolen from the channel @scienceclic
ОтветитьFinally a 3D representation that is much better than the 2D “rubber sheet” representation of a mass causing space to curve. But realize that the curvature is not just along the x, y and z axes, but in all directions 4π radians around the mass. Now if there were only a way to also incorporate the 4th time dimension visually. Maybe that’s asking too much.
Ответить"وَالسَّمَاءِ ذَاتِ الْحُبُكِ"
"By the heaven with its pathways (woven fabric)."
(Quran, Surah Adh-Dhariyat 51:7)
To explain how light would curve when traveling close to a massive object that bents space and time, you would also need the rotational movement, correct?
ОтветитьThis makes sense. Not the trampolene example.
ОтветитьWould first one be an example of a sun exploding?
ОтветитьThese idiots are just lying to be different.
Stop lying! Liar liar pants on fire!
ALL COMMENTS HERE ARE LIES!
THEY LYING!
THIS VIDEO IS LYING TO ME!!!!
THE FIRST ONE IS ACCURATE AND CAN BE REPRESENTED, BUT THE SECOND ONE IS CONFUSING AND CANT BE REPRESENTED WITH ANYTHING,
WHY
Just like magnet
ОтветитьThis presentation is purely useless sigh, when you move your finger into a curve, then the base of your finger travel at the same speed as the top of your finger, but the curve of the top of your finger is longer than the one of the base of your finger. How do you explain that ? Because it mean that the top of your finger reached a point B from a point A longer than the base of your finger at the same SPEED and same TIME, and, the base of your finger traveled a lesser curve with the same time & speed than the top of your finger with a longer curve !! Your presentation don't show the dilatation of time at all ! It's only space, but time in your presentation should be the opposite and it should grow bigger when you are close to the sun and not smaller and condensed ! Because time is slower when your are close to massive objects !
ОтветитьGravity holding us is like the coin caught between the ass and the cushion.
ОтветитьWhen we say "space-time" are we referring to the actual vacuum of space as well as time?
ОтветитьFor the first time I see a 3d depiction of bending of space time. Thank you.
ОтветитьStill just a visualization. Has nothing to do with the actual mathematical model of spacetime.
ОтветитьYou shouldn't pause the gravity during the video, it's makes people Think gravity stops flowing...
Ответитьit isn't true. this is 3 into 3, we need 3 into 4.
ОтветитьYou didn't show the rotational motion
Ответить