Tesla Model 3 winter range test

Tesla Model 3 winter range test

Bjørn Nyland

6 лет назад

50,098 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@youling1997
@youling1997 - 01.03.2019 07:52

first

Ответить
@theproffessional9
@theproffessional9 - 01.03.2019 07:53

Test the Model 3 standard range (base model) as soon as you can please

Ответить
@jimwhitehead1532
@jimwhitehead1532 - 01.03.2019 07:55

As you know, Tesla today (2/28) announced that all Tesla Model 3s are getting a firmware update that improves range. It will make for great before and after tests.

Ответить
@ryanj2843
@ryanj2843 - 01.03.2019 07:55

Are you planning on getting a Model 3 of your own? With the Standard model around the corner for Europe, might be worth looking into. :)

Ответить
@alexandreesquenet3736
@alexandreesquenet3736 - 01.03.2019 08:00

Similar to kona , good stuff

Ответить
@dmitchellhomes
@dmitchellhomes - 01.03.2019 08:02

you should test Kona again in the same conditions... this is spring, totally different then the conditions you last tested Kona

Ответить
@gillespelletier9161
@gillespelletier9161 - 01.03.2019 08:04

That summer in Canada :p
Leave it outside at -32°C for the night then check if it coldgate at -18°C . Yesterday temperature here.

Ответить
@TomHarrisonJr
@TomHarrisonJr - 01.03.2019 08:12

Would love to see your Model 3 tests in colder temperatures -- here in Boston it's also winter-ish now, but when it was real winter range seemed significantly degraded in some cases ... but not all.

Ответить
@TacEsk8
@TacEsk8 - 01.03.2019 08:21

New update coming gonna be a better longer range and faster acceleration

Ответить
@ramblerandy2397
@ramblerandy2397 - 01.03.2019 08:29

I suppose there is a small argument for colder air being more dense, so the 'winter' against the 'winter-ish' kms might make more difference at higher speeds, but it's only a suggestion. What does anyone think? Quite happy to be flamed. 😁

Ответить
@zoltronr6
@zoltronr6 - 01.03.2019 08:35

More sidewall.. More goodness. Always. I drove sprint cars, sidewall is your friend.

Ответить
@FancyaBevMate
@FancyaBevMate - 01.03.2019 08:38

Cool cheaper Teslas! No more stores to sell them great move by Elon. Just online sales! or more serious issues on the way who knows ;)

Ответить
@ginobrugman
@ginobrugman - 01.03.2019 08:53

I wish my fossil car would have a range of 433km. Btw i have a fiat panda lol

Ответить
@mskz06
@mskz06 - 01.03.2019 08:57

Please note performance version in title.

Ответить
@princeding2114
@princeding2114 - 01.03.2019 09:10

test it on snow ground (NOT OFF ROADING!!)

Ответить
@gatica1978
@gatica1978 - 01.03.2019 09:15

Can you test the range while driving in “chill” mode?

Ответить
@Eniz87
@Eniz87 - 01.03.2019 09:40

Thanks for the video👍👍

Ответить
@CSAFMedia
@CSAFMedia - 01.03.2019 10:01

Bjorn, how close are you to test driving a Rivian?

Ответить
@xmenx201
@xmenx201 - 01.03.2019 10:22

Super cheap TESLA 3 is HERE!!!
Select Your Car
Rear-Wheel Drive
Standard Interior
Standard Range

$26,950

Partial Premium Interior
Standard Range Plus

$28,950

Premium Interior
Mid Range

$31,950

Long Range

$34,950

Dual Motor All-Wheel Drive
Premium Interior
Long Range

$38,950

Performance

$49,950

Prices above include potential incentives and gas savings.Learn More

Ответить
@joopvanroy6599
@joopvanroy6599 - 01.03.2019 10:34

Wait till you test it on 18 inch summer tires, the consumption is ultra low! One of the best features of the car!

Ответить
@borisdemelo
@borisdemelo - 01.03.2019 10:38

Nice to have the table now to compare. Perhaps you could sort it by consumption, best to worst? Would make it easier to compare at a glance.

Ответить
@JustinMeijer
@JustinMeijer - 01.03.2019 10:42

What do you expect the longe range (not performance) will do in this weather? Is it a lot more, or close to this range?

Ответить
@andreasliewen
@andreasliewen - 01.03.2019 10:51

It's interesting that the consumption increases almost parallel to the speed (90km/h -> 120km/h, +33% and 171kWh -> 218kWh, +27%). I would expect a much higher increase in consumption since the air resistance (drag) takes the speed to square. Anyone have an idea why consumption is even lower? I acknowledge the measurement may not be super accurate since only 16/12km were driven but I would have expected a significant increase in percentage.

Ответить
@f.langenbach4822
@f.langenbach4822 - 01.03.2019 11:00

Saw in a few Norwegian Model 3 Navigate on Autopilot. Can you do a Test video?

Ответить
@Taraquin83
@Taraquin83 - 01.03.2019 12:52

Seems there is a close correlation between aerodynamics and increase in consumption with higher speeds as expected. The Ioniq is very similar to the Model 3 in aerodynamics due to both size and cda. Model S and X which have great cda still have larger bodies that increase air- resistance sompared with Model 3 and Ioniq. Wintertest in same conditions between Model 3 standard range and Ioniq would be very interesting, especially at sub zero degrees! How much will the heat pump aid the Ioniq?

Ответить
@nakrule7784
@nakrule7784 - 01.03.2019 15:22

This result is really strange. I average between 190 and 200wh/km with my S75D on the same condition at 120km/h. I was expecting the 3 to be better.

Ответить
@maximemineault8117
@maximemineault8117 - 01.03.2019 15:57

I prefer long videos! Plz!

Ответить
@apeiron1984
@apeiron1984 - 01.03.2019 16:18

well done!

Ответить
@mlevesque33
@mlevesque33 - 01.03.2019 17:51

I went on a road trip yesterday on my Model 3 LR RWD with 18" wheel Nokian R3 (no studs). I was getting around 187Wh/km at around -9°C.

Ответить
@luisag763
@luisag763 - 01.03.2019 19:53

Thanks for the table!

Ответить
@sondac999
@sondac999 - 01.03.2019 19:56

standard range will beat ioniq consumption? :)

Ответить
@michaelhainsworth9991
@michaelhainsworth9991 - 01.03.2019 21:45

I thought the performance model had a white dash trim, not the wood effect one.

Ответить
@Christer885
@Christer885 - 01.03.2019 21:59

👍😊

Ответить
@PabloBellissimo
@PabloBellissimo - 01.03.2019 22:17

Do you have that excel published somewhere?

Ответить
@sjd4532
@sjd4532 - 02.03.2019 01:08

You should know by now efficiency rated is for 18inch wheels with Aero covers. 20 inch wheel you lose close to 20% from rated. Try regular AWD or get smaller tires/rims

Ответить
@Reason077
@Reason077 - 02.03.2019 06:15

So noisy in that Model 3 at 90km/h!!

Ответить
@horsepower8633
@horsepower8633 - 02.03.2019 12:36

Which car will achieve less that 100wh per km at 90km/h first? Could it be the Tesla model 3 standard range?

Ответить
@medienwurmchen
@medienwurmchen - 03.03.2019 00:00

Very loud.

Ответить
@CoolSilver
@CoolSilver - 03.03.2019 02:49

My speedometer is off by 1 mph as well. I'm seeing about the same but less consumption with at 70mph this winter on AWD non-performance, aeros covers off.

Ответить
@kineticm32
@kineticm32 - 03.03.2019 05:01

Interior noise comes standard..

Ответить
@mathiashaugsb7100
@mathiashaugsb7100 - 03.03.2019 15:07

You should make a blog/website, where people can read and easily compare all your tests. Or would be very nice if you could provide a google spreadsheet that we can look at :D

Ответить
@rab6121
@rab6121 - 03.03.2019 18:00

In the speed Tesla have delivered M3 the last weeks it might be the nr1 best seller this year.
Already almost a thousand cars! That’s pretty sick. And delivery time is only 2-4weeks.
This is going to be interesting

Ответить
@vaidulis2415
@vaidulis2415 - 04.06.2019 10:20

Kona consumption 127? What? Is there a mistake? Why is it so efficient, much more efficient than any other ev

Ответить
@TimLF
@TimLF - 22.11.2019 22:01

5C?! Try again at -30C.

Ответить
@I0I0I0I0I0
@I0I0I0I0I0 - 08.02.2020 17:24

My performance barely has 250km range in winter conditions...

Ответить
@EVRevolution
@EVRevolution - 20.02.2022 19:22

5C is not a good test of winter temps, get it to lower than -15C and try it again. Would like to know the consumption then.

Ответить