Beautiful Cameras Under $100 Part 1

Beautiful Cameras Under $100 Part 1

snappiness

2 года назад

336,173 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@christians.9058
@christians.9058 - 31.05.2023 20:58

Ugly Olympus, Samsung NV 7 is a beauty ❤

Ответить
@jamesmata2945
@jamesmata2945 - 11.06.2023 22:00

Is there a resurgence in these older cameras. All of the listings on ebay were few bucks above a 100 $

Ответить
@uli659
@uli659 - 06.07.2023 05:21

Damn i saw this in a thirft store and bought a Samsung wb100 instead 💀

Ответить
@bsuthe
@bsuthe - 18.07.2023 03:13

I would suggest the Canon A720IS!

Ответить
@MrRob1426
@MrRob1426 - 26.07.2023 21:18

So what's your ebay store name?

Ответить
@eddievenuto1862
@eddievenuto1862 - 18.08.2023 06:23

Speaking of beautiful cameras. The nikon d three is one of the great cameras ever. I like big cameras. I don't like film cameras but I like old cameras that have image centers. Use nikon because I love their cameras.

Ответить
@zahariastoianovici8590
@zahariastoianovici8590 - 24.09.2023 00:22

Got one 15-16 years ago and thrown away after a year or so garbage images…. But the good news you made a service to who own one and now will be 400-500$ on the net….stop the bs about 20years old digital cameras

Ответить
@Antelope-jm9jx
@Antelope-jm9jx - 22.10.2023 15:56

That was my camera for several years as a kid

It was beastade with steel

Ответить
@rifwann
@rifwann - 08.11.2023 14:32

Im kinda in need of 20 year old recommendation.. so thank you..

Ответить
@mommarose9884
@mommarose9884 - 16.11.2023 04:23

I saw C-70 and thought C-700 was next

Ответить
@DashenBoi
@DashenBoi - 28.11.2023 09:30

Guys do not buy this. 7 megapixel is super low quality, even my $150 canon elph 180 is better than this at 20 megapixels.

Ответить
@FilmJunkieOutdoors
@FilmJunkieOutdoors - 30.11.2023 18:19

over hyped 😂 people are so weird trying to boost vintage cameras

Ответить
@lilfricc
@lilfricc - 02.12.2023 05:20

why did you say "cameras" but only list one? the fuck 💀

Ответить
@jeremygerard8306
@jeremygerard8306 - 23.12.2023 21:43

ew

Ответить
@devonstable9913
@devonstable9913 - 18.01.2024 01:18

I still use my C-7000Z. I particularly like the time-lapse feature which was unusual in a compact camera at the time it was launched.

Ответить
@11_44_ND
@11_44_ND - 18.01.2024 16:53

😍😍😍

Ответить
@wayback10
@wayback10 - 09.02.2024 02:14

My iPad has a 12 megapixel camera.

Ответить
@andrzejdeda2879
@andrzejdeda2879 - 16.03.2024 10:16

Mam ten aparat. Jest bardzo dobry, ma jednak swoje wady: bardzo słabe akumulatory i bardzo długo zapisuje pliki RAW. Mimo tego, lubię go i od czasu do czasu używam.

Ответить
@SpikeHead-Cactus
@SpikeHead-Cactus - 08.04.2024 18:43

I have a C-750 uz, tyr best thing it has an electronic viewfinder. Proper screen like in mirror less cameras. You can control everything without even using the full display.

Ответить
@Ice_Men_Gaming
@Ice_Men_Gaming - 27.04.2024 06:01

Thanks for the review

Ответить
@Capturocks
@Capturocks - 27.05.2024 02:17

Yesterday I bought Ricoh GX100

Ответить
@harraldschmitt9113
@harraldschmitt9113 - 29.05.2024 00:07

Bro, you good? That’s silver, and the only thing brown in the video is the table

Ответить
@sadeemayman
@sadeemayman - 30.05.2024 00:00

where can i found the acssouris for this camera??

Ответить
@mk_jsph
@mk_jsph - 03.06.2024 02:26

"Here are" and only shows one...

Ответить
@GenericJeebus
@GenericJeebus - 19.06.2024 05:53

A 7MP from 2004? Good lord, I collect older digicams from around that time and the closest thing I have to that is a 5MP cybershot from 2003, not to mention most off brands were interpolating 6MP from 3MP sensors even in 2005. Even the Olympus Camedias I have from around then are at max 3MP, they really pulled out all the stops for this one. My old Nikon D40 DSLR from 2006 is still only 6MP as well.

Ответить
@Tinycampro
@Tinycampro - 25.06.2024 03:17

So nostalgic!

Ответить
@bubbleboy3448
@bubbleboy3448 - 25.06.2024 04:26

Bro set this up as if it was gonna be a list then gave one camera 😔

Ответить
@bobopet2
@bobopet2 - 06.07.2024 00:17

Digital cameras from 2004 sssuuuuuuucked

Ответить
@pie.cinnamon
@pie.cinnamon - 10.07.2024 15:26

I need something for less than 30 dollar

Ответить
@punchmonc
@punchmonc - 25.07.2024 17:11

Bring back pocket digicams with view finders and pop flashes that are affordable. Most people don’t wanna spend potentially $1000 for an RX100 model to get features that were in cams < $100-200 over ten years ago.

Ответить
@budlyfps
@budlyfps - 02.08.2024 05:06

the only and biggest downside is that you would have to buy a $70 xd card for it to work cuz the yellow xd card adapter doesn't work with this camera

Ответить
@azolaun
@azolaun - 02.08.2024 07:05

I randomly found one at goodwill thrift for $25. Just need to buy a charger hopefully it still works

Ответить
@Mainstr3am
@Mainstr3am - 08.08.2024 05:07

I would recommend the canon s120 it's a good digi cam for 60-120 bucks depends on the region I got mine for 40 from an old guy who's from the u.k overall a great lil fella for taking pics and videos

Ответить
@brentsummers7377
@brentsummers7377 - 19.08.2024 10:41

These old cameras are only worthwhile if they take AA size batteries. Batteries are next to impossible to find for some old cameras.

Ответить
@SilkJohnson
@SilkJohnson - 21.08.2024 03:59

Now those cameras just shot up to $300 thanks influencers

Ответить
@colefox2882
@colefox2882 - 24.08.2024 09:33

As “beautiful” as they are the photos are pixelated trash 🗑️

Ответить
@tokyodiy
@tokyodiy - 25.08.2024 16:56

bronze? it seems silver and gray rubber grip....

Ответить
@yoko3021
@yoko3021 - 05.09.2024 12:53

Uses plural. Proceeds showing one.

Ответить
@CrystalBalderson
@CrystalBalderson - 12.09.2024 03:08

Vid: talking about a cameras design.
Me: what about the things it’s built for

Ответить
@GenX_in_the_wild
@GenX_in_the_wild - 14.10.2024 12:59

I never understood the point of a viewfinder.. Until i went out with my Kodak digi cam, that does not have a viewfinder and it was so bright I could not see anything.. haha.. Now I know :D

Ответить
@GenX_in_the_wild
@GenX_in_the_wild - 14.10.2024 12:59

Wow, super nice design..

Ответить
@harrisfogel6992
@harrisfogel6992 - 15.10.2024 01:56

These reviews should always mention if they shoot in RAW format. Makes a huge difference in image quality with older cameras. Ex-Olympus Pro here.

Ответить
@byxavi8710
@byxavi8710 - 28.10.2024 01:11

aaand thanks to videos like these, it’s so much harder to buy a camera under $100 😅

Ответить
@trevorwilkerson3508
@trevorwilkerson3508 - 31.10.2024 07:30

love the fact that this guy realizes “starting out” means you probably don’t have over $1000 to spend on the camera body alone

Ответить
@dat1dude591
@dat1dude591 - 01.11.2024 05:21

I have a c-60 I got for 15$

Ответить
@lukazupie7220
@lukazupie7220 - 09.11.2024 11:38

Wouldn’t pay 5$ for it 😀

Ответить
@BYCAREaskdadual
@BYCAREaskdadual - 04.01.2025 15:51

hiro❤sideflectors (driver-side eye more damaged) neweclipserollens neverdilationliquidever nevereyedrop(recalls) neverstaresun wifioffsleepoxygen muffsplugstinnitus grissombaron shatner911

Ответить
@ihateyou7547
@ihateyou7547 - 22.01.2025 13:37

I wish you could continue this series. I volunteer maybe the Olympus C-21T next, or the Minolta X60? Maybe even a Fujifilm Finepix F700

Ответить
@jujub5557
@jujub5557 - 20.02.2025 10:12

Canon c70 for under 100 😮😮😮

Ответить
@andrewp4172
@andrewp4172 - 09.04.2025 00:20

Very pocketable, and sits so well in the hand. And takes some really great pics. Olympus colour science is the best.

Ответить