National Review’s Charles C.W. Cooke reviews the differences between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris

National Review’s Charles C.W. Cooke reviews the differences between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris

Hugh Hewitt

2 недели назад

14,530 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@billturner6564
@billturner6564 - 28.10.2024 16:12

As an English man I can say with total honesty that this Prik is why the country has come 2 an end and now you have him I see he is doing the same for America 😅
I not that he is a perfect stereo type of the usles week stupid Liberal English
And after he listed all of trumps accomplishments and how Kamala will bring basically an end to your country he then says I won't vote 4 him 😅😅😅
What a prik

Ответить
@greggranja9
@greggranja9 - 28.10.2024 16:15

Hugh - this is exactly why people no longer have trust in the establishment. People such as your guest (and unfortunately i believe yourself) chose to ignore all the backdoor moves by past politicians that have threatened our constitution. Absolutely silent about antifa's riots in 2020 - there is a link to Jan 6th and everybody knows it - we are not stupid. Your guest and his ilk are spinless, Trump doesnt crawl in a corner. He fights, fights, fights! The destruction of our Country started with the 1960s generation. They are so full of themselves and gave us Clinton and Obama. Im 60 years old - im voting for my son and hopefully my grandchildren to be - im voting for Trump!

Ответить
@SgtZak_
@SgtZak_ - 28.10.2024 16:18

‘Ukraine hawk?” If only we were giving billions to a leader of Ukraine who is not a totalitarian dictator, who shut down all opposition and media…..this is nothing more than what we did in Central America during the 80s. Unacceptable.

Ответить
@cestmoi5687
@cestmoi5687 - 28.10.2024 16:21

Charles clearly not listening to what Trump has actually said about tariffs.

Ответить
@cestmoi5687
@cestmoi5687 - 28.10.2024 16:26

Lol. I've known about Charles for over a decade and even used to be a fan. He has been an entrenched never Trumper from the beginning. Even if the aftermath of the 2020 election did not happen, I'm sure he would have found another reason not to vote for Trump. Whatever.

Ответить
@AlvinRogers4689
@AlvinRogers4689 - 28.10.2024 16:34

THIS GU;Y BRAINWASHED ABOUT JAN6. TOO BAD. VOTE t FOR trump

Ответить
@JasonBaldridge-g1b
@JasonBaldridge-g1b - 28.10.2024 16:34

In other words, he’s not going to vote because he’s a pansy candy ass

Ответить
@user-h89kg9ghlldguhvt
@user-h89kg9ghlldguhvt - 28.10.2024 16:39

There was a reason we fought brits😂😂😂

Ответить
@user-h89kg9ghlldguhvt
@user-h89kg9ghlldguhvt - 28.10.2024 16:40

If a man still afraid to say that he is for trump,bhe is a coward and not smart.

Ответить
@lanesievers9238
@lanesievers9238 - 28.10.2024 16:41

Don’t you know that Ukraine is where much of child sex trafficking stems from?

Ответить
@loisking8736
@loisking8736 - 28.10.2024 16:42

Plain and clear camala is not qualified for President. Aside from fact I don't personally care for her, she brings nothing constructive, her ideas and policy's are unstable. Trump has his flaws but he's best candidate for President.

Ответить
@shirleybalinski4535
@shirleybalinski4535 - 28.10.2024 16:47

Historically, tariffs were the federal government's main source of revenue. Those were the days before federal taxes took over. If used smartly, they work!! I say give tariffs a chance. The shackles of taxes are eating the average citizen alive. They also offer an unlimited supply of spending & regulations. We, as a nation, must break our dependence on taxes & unleash the American spirit of building, manufacturing & " can do" spirit.

Ответить
@lanesievers9238
@lanesievers9238 - 28.10.2024 16:53

Ok…. You have just totally turned me off, Mr. Cook. You don’t know the facts. So you think what is alleged about Trump trying to reverse the election is WORSE than the lies and evil actions of Kamala Harris??? Pulease…

Ответить
@moviedevonk
@moviedevonk - 28.10.2024 17:08

What a looser

Ответить
@markrutledge5855
@markrutledge5855 - 28.10.2024 17:14

Elections are about choices. Sometimes we are forced to choose between the lesser of two evils. I find the idea of sitting out the election because neither choice is acceptable is really an abdication of responsibility. Come on Charles, choose the one who is less unacceptable to you! That is what adults do.

Ответить
@jefferytokarsky1930
@jefferytokarsky1930 - 28.10.2024 17:15

Hugh is willing to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian.

Ответить
@Trump-rv4nz
@Trump-rv4nz - 28.10.2024 17:24

You’ve got to choose a side

Ответить
@MrBradysteve
@MrBradysteve - 28.10.2024 17:33

I only recently learned that Continetti is Bill Kristol’s son in law.

Ответить
@that_hawaiian_gal
@that_hawaiian_gal - 28.10.2024 17:50

This guest is strange to not realize that not voting for Trump regardless will raise the chance of waking up to a Harris win. But very thankfully he’s in Florida.

Ответить
@peterpowder8546
@peterpowder8546 - 28.10.2024 18:00

Peter navarro 👍

Ответить
@thomaswilburn6217
@thomaswilburn6217 - 28.10.2024 18:01

By now if you can't see Ukraine for the money grift it is you are hopeless. This could have been ended years ago or never even started if NATO would have not been the aggressor. Plus, Biden got rich in Ukraine before this started so it's no wonder he would have pushed a conflict where billions get pushed into that contry only to get filtered back to him and the DNC.

Ответить
@kurtcocktoasten4592
@kurtcocktoasten4592 - 28.10.2024 18:07

This guy Cooke is weak. Intellectual pretense in search of a spine donor. Get over your TDS and sanctimonious machinations for why you can't vote for Trump even though you said you can't vote Harris. Don't allow "perfect" to the be enemy of "good".

Ответить
@BranNew1
@BranNew1 - 28.10.2024 18:29

Charles C.W. Cuck

Ответить
@MA2-o2l
@MA2-o2l - 28.10.2024 18:30

Retired Admiral McRaven for SecDef!!! Nobody else!

Ответить
@mattt198654321
@mattt198654321 - 28.10.2024 18:31

Cooke is a funny guy, but he obviously can't see the forest through the trees.

Ответить
@edwardkaggwa4856
@edwardkaggwa4856 - 28.10.2024 18:31

😂😂😮 Charles still has a bit of TDS that is taking long to be cured, he is on the mend , if Trump were to stand after the next 4yrs hoping he wins , Charles would /will campaign for him, he will be hilled.😅😅

Ответить
@ramongonzalez2112
@ramongonzalez2112 - 28.10.2024 18:59

Good Monday morning guys. Hopefully in 8 days we get hope and freedom back. Go Trump-Vance 2024!🙏🇺🇸

Ответить
@benhynum9879
@benhynum9879 - 28.10.2024 19:02

I wish cooke was a little less of a squish.

Ответить
@ramongonzalez2112
@ramongonzalez2112 - 28.10.2024 19:05

Excuse me. Josh Shapiro’s career is done inside the Democratic Party. They fear the Muslim lobby especially in Michigan too much.😈

Ответить
@shawncarter7188
@shawncarter7188 - 28.10.2024 19:07

If you think BOTH are disqualified then you have to vote for which one has policies that are better for the country. What a waste.

Ответить
@enoch9598
@enoch9598 - 28.10.2024 19:17

this guy is such a trump deranged hater.

Ответить
@GkGa8865
@GkGa8865 - 28.10.2024 19:25

Simple unbelievable in all polices Trump is better, but let’s people continue to suffer!

Ответить
@JohnSmith-ki2hl
@JohnSmith-ki2hl - 28.10.2024 19:28

Charles Cook is an Arrogant, Neo Con Anti Trumper. With Friends like him who needs enemies
I am seeing a trend with Hugh Hewitt really liking people like Senator Mitch (Cocaine) McConnell who is RINO

Ответить
@rebeccamooreMBA
@rebeccamooreMBA - 28.10.2024 19:30

Charles C Cooke brings out the worst in you, Hugh. Ukraine isn’t our quagmire thank you very much. Throwing away your vote on personal pet peeves is truly pathetic and is the main reason Cooke has been relegated to the conversational backwaters of irrelevance. At some point, we will have to have a reckoning with many failures of Reaganism.

Ответить
@tonyvBTFD
@tonyvBTFD - 28.10.2024 19:32

You’re great Hugh but love us some Charlie!!!

Ответить
@lbakemeyer
@lbakemeyer - 28.10.2024 19:50

I appreciated Charles Cooke's reasons for not voting for Trump as my son has the same argument but unfortunately he did vote for Kamala. I was born and raised in Cuba and witnessed the Communist take over of my country. Unfortunately the present Democratic party is more in line with the marxist worldview than they are for the Founders of our Republic. I did vote for Trump on the strength of his VP choice which I think is outstanding. For me Kamala as Sen. Kennedy aptly put is part of the loony AOC wing of the party without the bartending experience.

Ответить
@chrispaff1972
@chrispaff1972 - 28.10.2024 19:53

What is wrong with Peter Narrarvo?

Ответить
@chrispaff1972
@chrispaff1972 - 28.10.2024 20:03

Not another penny to Ukraine

Ответить
@realRainz
@realRainz - 28.10.2024 20:46

"that's an open question" - Cooke's TDS is pathetic

Ответить
@btspyglass4077
@btspyglass4077 - 28.10.2024 21:32

Tariffs yes
National Security
Equal tarriif Rates
Price Dumping

It was bait and switch
Free Trade is bs
It's all about Fair Trade

Ответить
@btspyglass4077
@btspyglass4077 - 28.10.2024 21:35

NR and Cook sux
J6 and 2020 elections were rigged
I told Lowery to take his mag and shove it

Ответить
@carmenbetancourt8282
@carmenbetancourt8282 - 28.10.2024 21:55

He comes off as very arrogant.

Ответить
@megatruth2546
@megatruth2546 - 28.10.2024 22:05

Harris is the worst Presidential candidate in my lifetime. Her policies are horrid. Can you imagine her, with her word salad, going toe to toe with Xi, Putin, etc.?

Ответить
@henryortmann2505
@henryortmann2505 - 28.10.2024 22:06

CW Cooke is irrational.

Ответить
@timothynettesheim7180
@timothynettesheim7180 - 28.10.2024 23:24

Cooke is really just another National Review never Trump neocon.
You could see him doing everything possible not to say anything good about Trump while still retaining the semblance of common sense. I won’t even listen to the Editors podcast anymore.

Ответить
@robertleonard5144
@robertleonard5144 - 29.10.2024 00:12

Your guest drank the koolaid on the fraudulent 2020 election.

Ответить
@rghurst
@rghurst - 29.10.2024 00:32

I think Charles is fundamentally misunderstanding what Trump wanted to do regarding the result so the 2020 election.

Ответить
@outwestsam1
@outwestsam1 - 29.10.2024 06:23

To actually think there's some kind of equivalence between camel toe and Trump is mind-boggling and the British accent I just he just so smart he's stupid

Ответить
@bsm9908
@bsm9908 - 30.10.2024 15:16

Cooke toned down his Trump opposition in this interview. He didn’t vote for Trump in 2016 and 2020 but only mentions January 6th as the basis for withholding the vote.

Trump’s actions on January 6th are disqualifying but that’s the tip of the iceberg of his unfitness for office. There are reasons Trump lost in 2020 and Republicans have decided the best way to avoid that debate is to act as if the year 2020 didn’t happen.

Ответить
@sam-bd2ko
@sam-bd2ko - 12.11.2024 12:42

What would Charles do if he had to cast the deciding vote?

Ответить