Fact checking to be scrapped on Facebook and Instagram | DW News

Fact checking to be scrapped on Facebook and Instagram | DW News

DW News

55 лет назад

25,856 Просмотров

The social networking giant Meta says it will scrap fact-checking on Facebook and Instagram. This was originally put in place to stop the spread of misinformation, but CEO Mark Zuckerberg says most content moderation will now done by the users, adopting a community-based model similar to that used by X. The change marks a reversal of policies Mr Zuckerberg has long championed despite criticism from conservatives over alleged censorship. The Meta CEO acknowledged that the shift has been partly triggered by the election of Donald Trump.

Chapters:
0:00 Zuck's pledge
1:05 Janelle Dumalaon, DW Correspondent
5:17 Joan Donovan, Assistant Professor of Journalism, Boston University

For more news go to: http://www.dw.com/en/

For more news, analysis and background information on the German election 2025 go to our dedicated page: https://www.dw.com/en/german-election-2025/t-70794502

Follow DW on social media:
►Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dwnews
►TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@dwnews
►Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deutschewellenews/
►Twitter: https://twitter.com/dwnews

Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: https://www.youtube.com/dwdeutsch

Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/user/deutschewelleenglish?sub_confirmation=1
#facebook #instagram #zuckerberg

Тэги:

#DW_News
Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@danielharnden5128
@danielharnden5128 - 08.02.2025 06:57

The United States people are done with the woke agenda. All the billionaires are coming out on Trump's side. Remember Biden had them in his pocket last election.

Ответить
@orcinogonzales3023
@orcinogonzales3023 - 26.01.2025 14:56

Nicenice boss

Ответить
@PraetorianAU
@PraetorianAU - 18.01.2025 22:12

Good. It's about time Facebook and other platforms get banned globally. America can keep them for internal use only.

Ответить
@JoeyH-sb3fq
@JoeyH-sb3fq - 18.01.2025 15:02

Emotional Democrats in these comments. Typical.

Ответить
@christineelisabethschmidtg8063
@christineelisabethschmidtg8063 - 15.01.2025 21:54

Great change mark .great u turn .

Ответить
@redreuben5260
@redreuben5260 - 15.01.2025 08:14

Stop using it.
Simple.

Ответить
@meeu
@meeu - 15.01.2025 02:17

Nah. fact checkers acted like they owned the information and prevented others from seeing the other POV. Glad it's out.

Ответить
@lowellnaito
@lowellnaito - 14.01.2025 23:04

When discussing fact checker, one must disclose who the fact checkers are. During the first Trump administration, approximately 90 % of the comments about Trump were negative. How could this be. Were the fact checker just deleting the positive comments that were for Trump?
All comments should be allowed raw and let the reader decide for himself whether they are factual or not. Perhaps facebook will reach a 50/50 split in the opinion category in the not too distant future.

Ответить
@Enfer1989
@Enfer1989 - 14.01.2025 22:53

"Kiss the ring". Rather something else.

Ответить
@obiemyster
@obiemyster - 14.01.2025 17:41

Well I just deleted my Facebook account as of 1/14/25 for this reason.

Ответить
@nskaries
@nskaries - 14.01.2025 15:54

Thats great, let the community decide.

Ответить
@deadlyoneable
@deadlyoneable - 14.01.2025 02:04

All these clowns in the comments thinking they were getting “Facts” or and “unbiased truth” before this announcement. The medias days of lying and putting out biased information is over. They can’t control the narrative anymore. Once the boomers all pass away, main stream media does too. Believe it or not, people CAN think for themselves. They don’t need a heavily biased 3rd party to do it for them. What’s wrong with you all? You’ve turned into zombies.

Ответить
@bccoregon
@bccoregon - 13.01.2025 22:34

Can you please interview Zuckerberg as to why Facebbok needed fact checking during a Democrat Presidency but now wont need fact checking during a Republican Presidency?

Ответить
@JohnyRodriguez-n3p
@JohnyRodriguez-n3p - 13.01.2025 09:07

That's because all of the fact checkers were funded by far left organizations that pushed for censorship of conservatives

Ответить
@hairegu2
@hairegu2 - 12.01.2025 13:25

Great news piece covering the reasons why Meta is removing the fact-checking, especially Janelle's part I think, where she got into further detail on the changes that are actually taking place at Meta in conjunction with the fact-checking removal, adding further context, an example of great journalism there I think, thanks!

Ответить
@tetzet3254
@tetzet3254 - 12.01.2025 11:57

But won't allow us freedom to uninstall meta platform. Yeah right Zucks!

Ответить
@sophiat2998
@sophiat2998 - 12.01.2025 01:32

Remember blue sky still exists!

Ответить
@dashman2062
@dashman2062 - 11.01.2025 05:41

To be fair, social media is (and never was) susposed to be a reliable source of information. I think it would be more effective to teach our kids not to belive everything you see online.

Ответить
@tadhgcronin175
@tadhgcronin175 - 11.01.2025 01:51

Fantastic day for Free Speech.

Ответить
@luxploded
@luxploded - 10.01.2025 23:38

@DW: the title and thumbnail are pure misinformation. It's not the "fact checking" that is to be scrapped, it's the contract with the selective "fact checkers" that will be terminated. "Fact checking" is still very important and will be based on community notes à la X which has been working very well so far for both "sides".

Ответить
@Ryan-mq2mi
@Ryan-mq2mi - 10.01.2025 17:31

Community notes is a far better, far better system. Why would you let extreme far left ideologues decide what is fact and what is it? How many times have they been wrong? I mean, I understand why they’re upset, they had narrative control, and they no longer will. But no one else should be upset about it. This is a good thing.

Ответить
@HenryAndersen
@HenryAndersen - 10.01.2025 00:01

Ban Facebook, and META in EUROPE. Or demand that European Privacy, and anti-hate speech is moderated in Europe. That goes for ALL social networks. We should have our very own European social networks, and stop using anti-democratic US solutions. Boycott the US, but and create European platforms.

Ответить
@bjam66
@bjam66 - 09.01.2025 23:36

Can you say who’s your daddy?

Ответить
@Nick24733
@Nick24733 - 09.01.2025 23:28

This lady loses a lot of credibility saying 'Ultimate Fighting Championship' lol would she say Lebron plays in the National basketball Association?

Ответить
@inupisjg
@inupisjg - 09.01.2025 23:11

Liberals hate free speech

Ответить
@colinhiggins4779
@colinhiggins4779 - 09.01.2025 22:16

Why did they think bringing this woman on to offer her garbage analysis was a good idea? She is literally the reason why social media companies are scraping their bogus, biased, and partisan “fact checkers”

Ответить
@isabelstokes4042
@isabelstokes4042 - 09.01.2025 21:35

I'll be ditching my Facebook account as soon as I tell my friends, and I'll encourage everyone else to do the same. It's going to become another toxic Twitter, which people are deserting in droves.

Ответить
@kristenfuller9168
@kristenfuller9168 - 09.01.2025 19:20

Why social media still a thing ? And I was wondering when his Facebook ever going to shut down I'm sure it won't though. Deleted mine. But I can't delete my messanger though. Because when I'm about to deactivate it it doesn't have the continue to use messenger option 🤦‍♀️ I'm frustrated with that. It won't fully let me leave. I don't really want people to continue the message me.

Ответить
@Shaadea
@Shaadea - 09.01.2025 17:05

the heavily left leaning media is just angry that their "truth" will now be challenged by other posts too. One sided information dripping is then ended (just remember the BS they did during Covid, folks!). We will get more crazy stuff for sure, but it also opens the doors for more information diversity. Only people will have to use their brains to weed out the truish stuff from the lies, it's not "curated" anymore (well, not like it used to). Misinformation was mostly done by the folks in charge, it was like that in the past 4 years and will probably go on. Just different kind of information now. Without the biased fact checkers there's the chance for good stuff to slip through though.

Ответить
@gretapantophlet9201
@gretapantophlet9201 - 09.01.2025 17:03

May the universe thwart all their plans 🙄🙄

Ответить
@Yyaammzz
@Yyaammzz - 09.01.2025 15:58

Zuckerberg is such a weasel

Ответить
@mourka01
@mourka01 - 09.01.2025 15:51

Because freedom means free speech even if it is speech you disagree with.

Ответить
@BrionneOlsen
@BrionneOlsen - 09.01.2025 15:44

Why? Because he has no backbone.

Ответить
@gotchewz
@gotchewz - 09.01.2025 15:31

I am watching America turning into the dystopian future imagined in Cyberpunk. I mean, I am not naive enough to think, that Washington wasn’t already in the pockets of corporations and the rich. But at least there was some kind of resistance or pretense. Now it’s just blatantly in your face. While Germany eventually was stopped, who stops the US?

Ответить
@davidware9549
@davidware9549 - 09.01.2025 14:43

Probably the same reason why he’s thinks he looks good 😂 he’s INSANE

Ответить
@AndreAmorim-AA
@AndreAmorim-AA - 09.01.2025 13:51

"Community notes" are better than "fact-check" companies. X has proven that this approach works better. Facts are still being checked, but in a different way; the more decentralized, the better.

Ответить
@dacejaunzeme4849
@dacejaunzeme4849 - 09.01.2025 13:44

yay, finally our Culture ppl won't get censored anymore. like reviews of books🙄🙄 etc the garbage of the censorship. an algorithm to decide what is good and what is not 🤮🤮 " Thank You, Zucky!!"

Ответить
@TCHCAROLINA979
@TCHCAROLINA979 - 09.01.2025 13:43

Zuckerberg is a spineless individual and people should simply scrap Facebook. I did years ago.

Ответить
@cremersalex
@cremersalex - 09.01.2025 12:41

Since Trump and Musk hate Europe, the Old Continent needs to abandon America and make an alliance with China, Russia and India.

Ответить
@NG-cx1mm
@NG-cx1mm - 09.01.2025 11:48

Aren’t there laws that forbids spreading lies, slander?

Ответить
@royalenfieldracer7806
@royalenfieldracer7806 - 09.01.2025 06:52

It’s a pity they don’t reinstate profiles they deleted for dopey free speech violations

Ответить
@PhotoXpression1
@PhotoXpression1 - 09.01.2025 04:58

Trump asked him, so he complies

Ответить
@chriswatson8436
@chriswatson8436 - 09.01.2025 04:31

Dude the haost sounds like Trician takanawa (monotone wise, and not as nasal)

Ответить
@OffWhiteDaz
@OffWhiteDaz - 09.01.2025 03:54

As if Facebook wasn't bad already. The inmates will take over the asylum now. Telling the truth isn't biased either. It's just a fact that one side pushes a lot of deliberate misinformation that needs to be corrected

Ответить
@larbranca
@larbranca - 09.01.2025 03:15

The left, in meltdown mode. Just look at the "disinformation expert" defending censorship of ideas not aligned with the left, just weeks after the majority of voters rejected them. Much as the "DEI experts", she will be soon out of a job...

Ответить
@Rogan205
@Rogan205 - 09.01.2025 03:02

A little bit too late Marky old. You missed the train. You didn't give two craps and a piss about censoring people. Kick Bricks.

Ответить
@Will-p5j
@Will-p5j - 09.01.2025 02:11

Defending the right to spread lies and slander on Facebook . BUT if I do so on this forum I would be banned . Hypocrites

Ответить
@Will-p5j
@Will-p5j - 09.01.2025 02:06

"the art of political doublespeak" Fact checking equals censorship.

Ответить
@diligentmindz
@diligentmindz - 09.01.2025 01:13

Where are the real business leaders? These gutless weaklings, “Don’t take my money!” Sickening

Ответить