Congresswoman Uses Her Position to Retaliate at Her Ex Fiancé

Great trailer. Cassie Jay vibes. Look forward to documentary

It is the complex of other women in the system using a default network to abuse men. It is legal weaponised feminism.

Why did she not ask to see the tape destroyed if she was aware of it and wanted out the relationship. You dont just ask you say I had sex under the camera show me it erased.

He should be there with him so we can hear his side. That would be fun.

Present danger. Come on.

VAWG there you go.

After this interview, Crowder should go to jail for murder because he hung her on her own rope.

She is trying to corner a cabal of other women who had sex with her ex, who she has a little boy with. THAT IS DISORDER.

The congress woman didn't have very good answers for Stephen's and Gerald's questions on why she did things the way she did, her reaction and using her position like this sounded like it was an emotional woman-brain moment in a breakup at best and more likely clout chasing petty vengeance on her ex. The "CSAM" allegation sounds like it was either unrelated guys or at worst just one of their kids running around the house naked and got caught on the security cams. She went to 3 investigators bc she was shopping for one to take the case, and all the supposed evidence was not as incriminating as she says. Whenever Crowder presses, she pivots away to some other man doing things unrelated or tangentially related to her ex as a Motte and Bailey argument. It all feels like a fake trad woman improperly using her office for trying to virtue signal and protect her reputation after being scorned. These hysterics are why historical civilizations didn't allow women in politics.

I'm male and taught public schools for 33 years. I could talk for hours how female teachers and administrators were constantly bosses. Even keeping to myself wasn't fool-proof.

Like a trophy alright! I keep em all

The best intro ever 🫡🫡🫡 👏👏👏👏👏👏

"most young men are single, most young women are not" think about that math there for a second lol

What's an old saying? Let a woman keep talking and she'll expose herself? Maybe another reason not to have them in political offices?

That particular pink dress is her most form fitting and flattering dress worn on days she's on camera

She is trying to override the tenth amendment (states' rights) AND abuse the "clear and present danger" doctrine which is only intended to apply to an "imminent" danger, and this issue does not deal with an "imminent" danger.

Sounds like she whats to put a stop to men haveing proof of innocence.

Pearl , I know the perfect low cost editor, he has tons of experience creating documentaries. He’s located in Atlanta, does amazing work, and is willing to travel. Where should I have him reach out to you?

Why is Nancy so against men in women's spaces when she invaded the Citadel (men's military college or was)?

Mace is setting the law so that men can be prosecuted for filming themselves to prove their innocence when being falsely accused.

Scorned Ex.

It's pure evil naming names knowing you have immunity

You can't say it unless it is tried. So it most likely happened. Stop trying to allow man to hurt women because that is sick!

Doesn’t start until like 16 minutes.

Yea... I'm in congress and I have no idea what a security camera looks like on the wall pointing to the living room. Got it.

No way Id vote for this chick

That was one of the most despicable things I’ve seen. How does she not care about false accusations at all?! Also this wasn’t some random date she went out with a few times. They were engaged and she’s saying this

She is a covert feminist in my opinion.

The problem with this law seems to be to me that it will backfire. Sort of like mandatory arrest/primary aggressor laws in lots of states, because the law didn't specifically say "men would always be arrested . . . " they said "someone must always be arrested" the law wound up marginally increasing how many men were getting arrested in DV calls, and wildly increasing how many women. Similarly, this might get some more men charged with some things that otherwise weren't, but I bet it will wildly increase the number of women in ways she's not expecting. I mean, how many women will come forward with photo evidence of what they are calling abuse, and wind up being guilty of voyeurism? That's just off the top of my head.

I mean I guarantee, more women have more ring and home security cameras than men. How many of them also delete 99.99% of the footage but keep . . . she's assuming it's zero for . . .reasons?

Funny thing. I didn't stop watching LWC because of the divorce but because of the issues I heard about his behavior behind the scenes and apart from the simps who sided with his ex wife. It was more the way they treated Dave that made me lose confidence with Crowder.

This woman does not seem honest or genuine!!

Oh I thought the documentary was done, and advertising was just starting. When would the documentary be done? From my experience, hearing from the creator of the Super Smash Bros Documentary, it took him a whole other extra year to justify/protect against all copyright infringement potential with logos and graphics that could be visible in any scene in the entire documentary. And not just copyright infringement of big companies, but even lone individuals who so happened to make some artwork, posted said artwork on the internet, and said artwork happened to be visible as a print, on a shirt, or a banner, or a screen, somewhere in the documentary.

They are attacking her like they are attacking you. Shes still is a good Rep fighter

❤

Like how they tried to make steven crowder look bad.

Pearl you are playing in to there trap.

The left is loving this.

She didn’t address their questions at all she actually gaslighting and officiated. BS

terabytes of data being transferred from phones?

How many phones does he have? That is a HUGE amount of data.

The photo that she should during her testimony was pretty low res so I bet lower than 480p. One terabyte of 480p video at a 2.5Mb/s bit rate is 889 hours of video.

I am kinda not believing her. Proof that claim.

Also, what is with the "I accidently discovered it" garbage. You logged into his phone with your thumbprint and then you clearly dug through his phone, programs, and / or filing system. No accidents here.

I won't marry until the laws change!

I spent 15k on useless lawyers who wouldn't even fight my entire case! Its a set up to drain a men's wallet

Mace also only made public accusation on congress floor, which shielded her from defamation law, she had not spoken about it outside congress floor.

I just looked up trumps take it down bill that was recently past. Says nothing about it being illegal to keep said images and or videos. Just that it is illegal to upload said lude content without the victims consent.

So men and women too, if you film it you can still use it in a court of law to prove or disprove SA allegations. I wanted to look that up for that specific reason because honestly if someone was accused of SA and used a video they took in a court to prove their innocence then it would pretty messed up if that person trying to prove their innocence just got hauled off for having that proof just landing them in another pot of hot water.

Sorry ladies but the moment you post or send anything on your phone to someone else, it immediately becomes public domain, no take backsies. We live in an era where we're all being recorded, monitored, surveilled, and are on camera everywhere we go, deal with it.

Women can be in Congress and can send men to die. But women arent required to be in the selective services(draft) so much for equality...