Subjectivity vs Objectivity | How the Mind Influences Reality

In pertinence to the world of politics, the mainstream media has perpetuated their own subjective beliefs to such an extreme level that it has influenced people into being completely against critical, logical, rational, and objective thinking. With this massive echo chamber effect, especially in American society, our country has become increasingly more divided as a result. I haven’t posted anything yet, but the goal of my channel will be to bring people from all sides of the political out of the deceptive/manipulative tactics of the political space and to spread the importance of objectivity when consuming political content. If everyone would be able to let go of their subjective outlook then our country would go right back to a unified state, in fact, we’d be in the best state we’ve ever been. Until then this “brainwashed” agenda will throw gas on the flames of division and it will get much worst.

subjectivity does not need to be "subconscious" just because they share the same prefix.
subjectivity depends on one person, a person
objectivity depends on everything that perceives (consisting of more than humans, and more than psychology)

Man i can't stand anyone with opposite opinions. How to solve this

this sucks don't watch again

Thank you. This clarifies some things. I am in college and have been confused by my economics class when they present "facts" that can not be proven or disproven and present as inarguable truth.

All bourbon is whiskey but not all whiskey is bourbon. All Objective can be subjective. but not all subjective can be objective.

Things are looking up—vital refund info

Tune into an exclusive interview with Binance's CEO for a sneak peek into future developments

What lies ahead? Exclusive interview with Binance's CEO offers insights into future developments

Your Sales Incentive payment has been successfully processed.

didn't see this sht on tiktok, yet this is life saving for some people who can't get out of their bubble...would be nice if this was an ad i couldve watched ten years ago but as for now i appreciate the fact that it's just information that can be memorized.................or not.

The countless amount of back and forth online we have around this notion mind blowing, this is why social media platforms like X and YT exist, as well as Reddit and online forum and chat rooms.
It’s a matter of prospective and ones interpretation.
Also, cancel culture originates from cutting people off that do not agree with popular beliefs.
To dig deeper- let say there is a video or a thread on any given subject and the op states their facts and beliefs and experiences, now before stating the contrary, I want to signify why it’s so important to take part in these discussions and how it’s okay to learn to disagree with certain things and still keep it neutral because 1 you don’t have all facts, you can’t proof the ops argument with your views alone, then you end up going on a tirade of he said, she said and then it become personal because then when other present their side, then people’s feeling start to get hurt and that is how everything begins and they end up turning a mountain out of a molehill.
Coming back to the ops thread/video/article, let’s say it’s a subject on marketing and lists their method on advertising step by step from their perspective.
The reader reads through it and either, wants to find out more or goes on a whole rampage about how the steps and advertising method chosen is correct. Now, everyone will have a different opinion and there will be no correct way of doing anything. But people tend to go on imaginary hate campaigns because something was said that they probably didn’t agree with, even if the op did not mention anything other than what works for them, let’s say there was not discussion of why this was the best method, why you should follow it etc. it’s just an opinion, you’re free to take that opinion as you wish.
Anything other then that is just putting words in peoples mouths, arguments over why you didn’t chose xyz over what was mentioned, when none of this was there to begin with. Disagreements are healthy but there is a thin line between disagreements and bending it into something completely different.
Learn to understand that’s their belief and way like you got yours. But alas, knuckleheads brain don’t operate that way, sadly.

Irrespective of objectivity or subjectivity there HAS to be Diversity in this video..

All truth is Relative

Wholesome as Mr Holmes

There are three levels of filter between Actuality and reality-to-us. They are physical, subconscious/cultural, and personal/psychological.

Objectivity is a mere happening within what you call subjectivity, i.e. consciousness, because everything is consciousness. You can't escape your own consciousness. The origin of thought/the intellect, impartial as it pretends to be, is that very thing you call subjective - sensation, to memory, to thought/knowledge (knowledge being a form of thought) and there is nothing any more objective in thought and reason then there is in sensation, of which it is a mere derivative. The whole of civilization conditions the human brain - the material of thought are the products of social and historical accumulation, entrenchment, ossification, and neurological adaptation: and this very thinking, this very socially conditioned mind is that which creates civilization, so civilization makes the mind what it is, and the intellect makes civilization what it is. Rather, they are both one process - social historical accumulation, proliferation, social mimesis and replication (causing standardization), social and neurological entrenchment - it is one indivisible process. The objective world of science and civilization depends on the human brain, mind, consciousness, more then it does even petroleum and money, and this is an obvious fact if you look at it. But feeling, emotion, the body and its exquisit homeostatic harmony IN UNSPOILED CONDITIONS is the very same victim of social-historical ossification as the rest of nature which is destroyed and degraded by the whole of civilization. The oppressive ego of human kind - which is a social process pretending to be 'me' - is the very same thing as the oppression of the elite of the natural human substrata, and the oppression of the whole of nature by the totality of civilization. These links are not theoretical: they come about through the observation of what is free of concepts. Awareness itself is unbias, truthful, merely shows what is, as it is. But what is is consciousness, which can is as follows: awareness, what we call sensation, thought, feeling, imagination, emotion, and non-ordinary experiences. Knowledge is thought, and both knowledge and thought are representations of the fact, not the fact itself. The fact is that which is perceived, not measured, because perception is the mother of all measure and only perception can have unmediated contact with all that is, which is to say, consciousness. Go ask a quantum physicist about objective reality by the way.

Fascinating subject indeed for me but that is of course subjective.

Maybe set standards that can be agreed upon can overcome subjective wims but even then that is not always the case.

Even signed treaties/agreements, contracts agreements promises etc are broken.

Im starting to think that subjectivity is really what governs many peoples realities.

Even though objectivity is what really matters but does it?.

The rain thing is interesting because our emotions towards rain can change constantly if not straight up instantly. I am a good example as I have hated raining only to immediately begin liking it a few seconds later due to seeing something. Basically as un objective as it gets.

Thanks!

May need to have an update to the video and expand the ideas more.
Near the end you capture the true meaning of pure subjectivity.
The perception or interpretation of reality is the relative experience.
The Absolute Reality exists independently of what you think or feel about it. Likewise you cannot measure or quantify infinite reality in an objective way. Ultimate reality in its totality is not measurable. The Absolute pure experience of reality is in complete receivership without comments, thoughts, comparison to past events or filters. An allowance to let everything to 'Be' as it is. Openness and Letting go.
Anyways that is the general idea of what I think all the sages of the past are pointing towards.
You can likely refine this concept in your own effective style much better than I can and articulate it with both pictures and words so the viewer can understand.

I think the rain still raining, can still fit into the Subjective Experience. As you experience the rain, the rain also experiences you. The issue with your definition of Objectivity is that is leaves itself open to a “Ship of Theseus Paradox”. Furthermore your perspective of Subjectivity is Human-Ego-Centric, it discounts the fact that we aren’t just in the world, but a part of it. Of consciousness is itself a way that the universe observes itself. It why I hazard to guess that Consciousness came into being in the first place. That the multitudes of atoms and stars coalesced expressly so the the Universe may observe itself through our subjective experiences. Thus Objectivity is little more than a lie agreed upon. All subjective experiences are how you approximate the truth.

I LOVE THIS TRUTH

" How is it possible
that your perspective of
the world around you depends more heavily on your
subconscious minds
interpretation of it
then it does on perceiving the world as it actually is ?



To the pure all things are pure

To the unpure nothing is pure.

I walk by faith
not by sight

The very reason
I gullible let folks followers
of no-man mislead
mom and me

Great explanation! Thank you!

great vid

But John the golfer needs rain for the grass on the course and we all need rain for crops yet 90% of people would react with John. Subjectivitsm is shit

"Some people feel like abortion is wrong; others feel it is alright. Some people feel like cheating on a test is ok; others do not feel that cheating on a test is ok. So, if you want to study ethics, drop your philosophy class and enroll in some psychology courses. That's where you learn what makes people feel this way or that about any given issue."

May we get a video on realists vs nominalists? your videos are so easily and clearly understandable. Thank you for this video.

Thanks for the examples and explanation.

Good lesson, but a bad example. Or, at least not very relatable to me personally.
Consider: subjectively, I tend to enjoy a rainy day outside my window, because it resonates with my internal aesthetic.
However, objectively - unless it is a very hot summer day, I would hardly ever enjoy being caught under it, as the rain droplets are - objectively - cold and wet, and will cause objective physical discomfort, lest it is a custom scenario where I have warm shelter, a towel, and a clothes-dryer readily available on demand. This is why, colloquially, getting caught in the rain is considered a negative experience due to the lack of control one has over the discomfort it brings. Thus, my subjective dislike of being caught in it has little to do with my established experiential prejudice, since I've had plenty of experiences where I'd have the time of my life literally dancing in the rain.
Just saying...

💯this deserves some love peeps

well done on the vid!

wow. Yes ✅