Комментарии:
Yes. It is.
ОтветитьU.S.military power regarding air defence and miscile technology is a long forgoten memory.They are whole two generations behind Russia.Even China and India are ahead of U.S. in this matter. If you need a miscile Russias door is the one to knock on.Straight facts
ОтветитьWhy do not you do a remake now that it has 3 years of combat experience in Ukraine?
ОтветитьYou're a very useful and interesting resource for ordinary people like myself. I like your content which askes me to consider and think critically.
ОтветитьI know they have been upgraded but am amazed ( am an Army Veteran) we had Patriots in 1980
ОтветитьSo they got all the old Patriot stuff?? Interesting
ОтветитьToday's American Patriot is the best missile defense system in the world without question. The Patriot shot down 11 of russias over hyped kinzal missiles and with a 95% kill rate it's a beast. The S400 is a joke it can't track stealth fighters and can't protect itself from HIMAARS ATACM's or rockets which has destroyed 9 of it's missile batteries.
ОтветитьWatching the first few minutes, I think it will need a local anti-Drone protection systems.
ОтветитьTotally garbage "Rah, rah America" channel.
ОтветитьWhat a bunch of American "We're number one!" bullsh*t. The fact that Turkey and India bought the S-400 instead and faced American sanctions to do it tells you all you need to know. This video sounds like it was made by Raytheon or some other American contractor.
ОтветитьThere is nothing positive to say about patriot and its community either. We've waste hundreds of billions on this. I worked on it.
ОтветитьThis guy is an American, so his conclusion doesn't surprise me. note that he categorized the S400 & American patriot in the same light--he does not have all the info on the S400. besides, Russia doe snot only rely on the S400 but a combination of defense systems
ОтветитьPatriot couldn't hit a barn door on a clear day. It had a hit/miss ratio of 5% during Gulf 1, not 25% like you claim. Of course, they claimed 95% accuracy at the time. 😁😁
ОтветитьI don’t know about the gulf war because back then Patriot was made to shoot down aircraft not short range ballistic missiles. The fact that they pointed it at incoming Scud missiles and hit 25% of them is pretty good considering they weren’t designed to hit those it was designed to hit aircraft going a maximum of Mach 2.5 not a ballistic warhead traveling Mach 12. But shortly after the conclusion of the first Gulf War software upgrades and eventual missile upgrades put ballistic missiles on the menu too and today right now as we sit here in 2024 Patriot has a success rate of greater than 98%. I. 2004 it was greater than 95%. Greater than 98% is practically speaking a 100% succes rate. The only reason a Patriots would not hit its target is because of a fault in the missiles rocket motor for example or some kind of damage to the radar array. It hits whatever you launch it at.
ОтветитьThe S-300 and S-400 are garbage. They can’t shoot down a short range ballistic missile like Kinzal for instance or ATACMs apparently. Because the Ukrainians shoot down Kinzals on a regular basis with Patriot and the Ukrainians also blow up S-300 and S-400 stations with ATACMS!! Yes you head me correctly. The Ukrainians use American short range ballistic missiles to destroy Russian S-300 and 400 stations. All the time. As far as the S-500 I would have to assume it’s just more of the same crap with a new sticker on it. They just take the 300 and 400 stickers off and but a brand new S-500 sticker on it and sell it to smaller countries because we will not sell them Patriot. The Germans have a surface to air missiles array that is on par with Patriot. And we also have THAAD. we have GMB and THADD for intermediate range and intercontinental ballistic missiles and Patriot for short range ballistic missiles and aircraft and cruise missiles and drones. And we have French Geppards for drones. It’s a lot more cost effective to shoot down a drone with a 20 mm bullet than a 3 million dollar missile. Oh and I gotgot about perhaps the best antibiotic missile out there. The SM-6 and the SM-2 and 4. The Navy’s Aegis system is extremely advanced and can shoot down intermediate and short range ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, aircraft, and drones with extreme accuracy using the SM-6 family of interceptors and they have a range of 230 miles and travel at Mach 4.
ОтветитьAll in all the last encounter Patriot vs Russian attack (s) the Patriot defeated such an attack . The Russians threw at it several attacks from totally different locations and PATRIOT WON .THEY USED HYPERSONIC MISSILES AND DEFEATED THEM TOO . Yay
ОтветитьWhat a stupid title
Ответитьthe Patriot system is so bad that it not only failed in combat against the Houthis but the interceptors are themselves now being intercepted, which is something that has never been done to any interceptor. The Patriot may be the most well-understood and comprehensively defeated air defense system in the world
Ответить"NO BIG DEAL FOR A WEALTHY NATION LIKE THE USA" SANDBOXX NEWS IS A FIRST RATE MEDIA ENTERPRISE.
ОтветитьWHY DID IT TAKE SO LONG FOR SWEDEN TO TRAIN ON THE SYSTEM IN THE USA?
ОтветитьIT IS THE WORLDS BEST SYSYEM. NO ONE CONSIDERED THE IRANIAN TYPE CHEAP DRONES BEFORE RUSSIAN SPECIAL MIL. OP. THE MANUFACTURE CANNOT BLAMED FOR THAT. ITS THE CUSTOMER FAULT.
ОтветитьThanks!
ОтветитьDid the U.S. Navy ever consider using the Patriot system?
ОтветитьYou quote a lot of reports man which are unreliable...reporting agencies are biased by design because to stay viable they need to report what paymasters say to report...
A more reliable data bank is asking why israel is trying to sell all their patriot missile systems and im talking recently and when asked why they said because they cant shoot shit out the sky and thus israel is using their own systems...
That doesnt bold well at all thats a reliable data point because if it works well you use it you dont have a firesale and say they suck...
Point being you can drown in endless reports or you can watch what countries who bought them and used them and what they do...buy more or sell them for pennies and make their own...
Think about it
Wonder how well it will do against a true hypersonic glide vehicle. Its hard to believe the US hasnt found a way to get the cost down. 3 mill a shot is a bit out of most budgets
ОтветитьThere is an Azteca in every chocolate chip cookie and an smoked sausage found in every polish sauer-craught packed dirty grilled po-boy sandwich,harris county northwest houston texas.
Jon Raborn : TBN Vatican News
Mobile loaves & fishes inc.
Silicone valley hollywood & L.g.b.t multi-collored Rainbow Flag District california. community first village inc. hog eye road, travis county austin texas.Entertainment tonight : Nashville Tennessee.
Batonrouge Louisiana.
Keywest Monroe County Florida
Keplavik Reykjavik Iceland
IT SHOOTS DOWN KINZHAL HYPERSONIC MISSILES that says it all....
ОтветитьIt is not that complicated: The Army will replace the Patriot Advanced Capability-3 missile with the IFPC this year 2024.
ОтветитьALEX! Don't be telling everyone about what other military personal from other countries told you about the true range of the Patriot! Now everyone knows! DUDE, you could of just helped our allies and us lose LIVES! WAKE UP MAN....
ОтветитьThe Partiot, almost is what it is ever going to be.. We need better defensive missile systems..
ОтветитьYes two thumbs up ! I love your air power info. I was hearing at the end of this show with my head set on and I thought someone was behind me blowing there nose ! I thought it was my kid! Great surround sound mix.......
Ответитьyou know about metal storm? can they do something special ...cause iknow much more can be done with it's capability...!!!
ОтветитьLooking back after a year, the patriot is EXACTLY what it was hyped up to be.
ОтветитьPatriot system is so good in nature so why Russian jets never felt any threats from them...😅
ОтветитьYou are wrong to say that the Patriot system performed poorly during Desert Storm. In fact, it performed very well, as expected, with over 90% successful engagements against Iraqi ballistic missiles. The whole bad perception was intentionally made by Theodore Postol, who did his research, and he found that most of the downed Scuds fell apart after a successful engagement, and sometimes their warheads exploded on the ground killing people in some Israeli kibbutz. He called it "a poor performance", regardless of the fact that thanks to the Patriot system, out of 40, only one of all targeted by Iraqi forces places were hit - barracks in Dhahran (because of software error in time calculations). This opinion was widely publicized worldwide, and it attached a "tail" to the Patriot system. Then Postol spent the rest of his career to publicize his view of how clueless the entire missile defense system is, including several visits to Moscow in Russia.
ОтветитьTell us about the S.I.S.A.W the new Airforce long-range SAM platform hunter.
ОтветитьGreat, as always! What are our abilities to defeat a strategic missile attack? Do we have an Iron Dome?
ОтветитьThe longest interceptor of patriot is of 160km range ,, the longest kill of s400 is over 150km. And longest missile has a range of 400km .
And still the missile of patriot are hell lot of expensive..
We aint talking about s500 yet.
Russia truly dominates air defence systems wheather take mobile sams or fixed one they are ahead in all of this systems
It already has made an enormous difference, proved to be able to deflect the latest Russia hypersonic missiles and efectevely created no-fly zones over large Ukraine regions, yeah, I think that can be safely said that it is good.
ОтветитьIf the s-400 has 100% what the one that barely cleared the tube or the one that zipped around the missile cruiser. Yeah 100% they all hit air molecules..
ОтветитьPutting an American in charge of the fire control rather than automation is probably less likely to prevent friendly fire.
ОтветитьWHY NO MORE SEMI-ACTIVE MISSILES FOR AIRBORNE APPLICATIONS BUT STILL FOR STATIONARY MISSILE SYSTEM?
ОтветитьShort answer
Maybe
Long answer
Maybe
Learning period for the west, bouncing off Patriot signals and Auax signals on Russia rockets, intelligence community is busy
ОтветитьI love how you are honest not knowing how non emitting detection works, how does it bounce off object without emitting
ОтветитьInteresting !
ОтветитьAnother patriot video. Another patriot video that is mostly correct until it's not.
ОтветитьFUN FACT
The "problems" with the Patriot System in the Gulf War that Russian propagandist love to talk about were due to Iraq's junk ballistic missiles falling apart at altitude, causing the Patriots radar to track all the pieces and fire up to 10 interceptors per missile. The book "The Pentagon's Brain" released in 2014 talked about it 9 years before they were sent to Ukraine. So its not just some excuse made up after the fact.
"You-crane" 🧐
ОтветитьHind sight made this even more interesting, lol
Ответить