An Advantage of standing military like the Romans Had #martialarts #war #history #learning

An Advantage of standing military like the Romans Had #martialarts #war #history #learning

Marcus Vance

3 дня назад

34,378 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@SwordTune
@SwordTune - 20.06.2025 20:39

Turning your problems in your enemy's problems.

Ответить
@Notactually234
@Notactually234 - 20.06.2025 20:41

Can you do a video on the good and bad of horse chainmail

Ответить
@SnacxAttac
@SnacxAttac - 20.06.2025 20:52

Didn’t the romans also utilize tactics that would reduce battle casualties?

So it’s neat that they were also taking care of the men to an extent, and not just throwing them into a meat grinder.

Ответить
@AdamTehranchiYT
@AdamTehranchiYT - 20.06.2025 21:51

I can only assume Army recruitment hasn't changed much since then🤣

Ответить
@Jesse_359
@Jesse_359 - 20.06.2025 22:06

It's a matter of human nature that some % of your population are going to be drawn to, uhm, lets call them, somewhat more violent modes of conflict resolution. Finding constructive outlets for people of that emotional leaning is a pretty good idea if you can. That or lots of therapy. Maybe both.

Ответить
@ИванМартемьянов-м7б
@ИванМартемьянов-м7б - 20.06.2025 22:27

2 birds, one gladius. 🔥🔥🔥✍️✍️✍️

Ответить
@gmclucy
@gmclucy - 20.06.2025 22:34

A standing army is just a jobs program when you're not fighting a war

Ответить
@BAGELMENSK
@BAGELMENSK - 20.06.2025 22:38

If the army, marines, or navy disbanded we'd have more problems than just a lack of defense.

Ответить
@watchface6836
@watchface6836 - 20.06.2025 23:42

Having a standing military establishment also made expanding your military in times of emergency much easier as the logistical and training establishments necessary to do so are already in place.

Ответить
@conboy147
@conboy147 - 20.06.2025 23:55

Very smart tactic

Ответить
@MinMaxist
@MinMaxist - 21.06.2025 00:12

Well yeah I bet if they were sitting it wouldn’t have gone so well

Ответить
@prodbyKamikaZ
@prodbyKamikaZ - 21.06.2025 00:17

Yea can we please do this again, allow felons to serve dumbebies

Ответить
@cyehop
@cyehop - 21.06.2025 00:28

It worked until the generals of that standing army made grabs for power, then they used those highly trained and loyal would-be bandits to start civil wars. This was especially the case as the Republic reached its later years, which was one contributing factor in Rome turning into an empire. It also didn't really stop some of the barbarians from causing enough mayhem to require military responses. All that said, yes, it did reduce banditry and the number of rebellions, but the rebellions that came about from it also involved Roman veterans fighting each other out of loyalty to their generals before loyalty to Rome itself.

Ответить
@Angushrothgar
@Angushrothgar - 21.06.2025 11:20

Can you do the pro's and con's between a standing, and reclining military

Ответить
@bakerbee1807
@bakerbee1807 - 21.06.2025 11:30

DO NOT LOOK UP TWO GIRLS ONE GLADIUS

Ответить
@WHiT3_SHAD0W
@WHiT3_SHAD0W - 21.06.2025 11:32

They also had towns just made up of soldiers and their families. Wish the US did this. Soldiers go to war and build the strongest bonds of their life's- just to go home and live with people who don't know what they had to deal with.

Ответить
@donaldduck9884
@donaldduck9884 - 21.06.2025 12:10

Correct as well, professional drilled and ready assembly for military campaigns.
Compare medieval European, there nobility sons who had no land to inherit, because primogeniture laws. Ending up either hired swordsman or bandits.
The first crusade had as well, "2 bird one stone" affect. With many landless sons, had the opportunity to seek fortune in the holy land.

Ответить
@goober-ey7mx
@goober-ey7mx - 21.06.2025 13:50

Off topic, but I love those anthropromorphic visors. It's a pity they aren't represented as much in media.

Ответить
@joso5681
@joso5681 - 21.06.2025 18:05

why this fall out of use in the (early) middle ages? where medieval states incapable of maintaining a standing military?

Ответить
@jackpfefferkorn3734
@jackpfefferkorn3734 - 21.06.2025 22:04

Didn't Rome have a civil war every five years or so for its entire existence?

Ответить
@slade355
@slade355 - 22.06.2025 00:19

“Two birds one… Gladius” this is why I absolutely love your videos.

Ответить
@WesternCommie
@WesternCommie - 22.06.2025 18:36

Yeah.. they just had to be okay with killing innocent farmers and civilians.

Ответить
@brettnelson6710
@brettnelson6710 - 23.06.2025 08:41

Yeah you gotta pay those guys tho and equip them. Probably worked out fine in the end with no issues.

Ответить
@jeffjag2691
@jeffjag2691 - 23.06.2025 23:43

I didn’t think of this before. This explains why the US standing military grew as it did.

Ответить
@DeanJMU
@DeanJMU - 24.06.2025 01:19

I'm glad there was a standing Army around to keep me from banditry and rebellion.

Ответить
@joshridinger3407
@joshridinger3407 - 24.06.2025 01:23

they still turned to banditry and rebellion not infrequently. we just call it 'civil wars'.

Ответить