Комментарии:
Obama was similar to The Rock
ОтветитьWhat the fuck just happened
ОтветитьCalm down it's just u' u^a classic power derivative 🤣🤣🤣🤣
ОтветитьThis made more sense than my actual calculus class lol
ОтветитьThis is the worst it will ever be
ОтветитьJust multiply and divide by 3
ОтветитьI think we're gonna be alright.
ОтветитьLet's take a critical analysis of the displayed equation, let's y = (3x - 1)^(4) using the integration approach a^(n) ≈ (1/(n+1))*a^(n + 1) via substitution, so let u = 3x - 1 || u^(4) || u' = (1/5)*u^(5) || we have to also integrate the integrable variables in u, so 3x - 1 ≈ (3/2)*x^(2) - x and multiply it by the integral of u, giving us ((3/2)*x^(2) - x)*(1/5)*u^(5), it should be noted that we have to replace the original value of u = 3x - 1 into our eqn. to get our final answer ((3/2)*x^(2) - x)*(1/5)*(3x - 1)^(5)
ОтветитьCalculus isn’t very hard (at least 1 2 and 3) but it takes people some time to process these things for the first time
ОтветитьZena Neutrino knows her calculus!
ОтветитьIs it really Jenna Ortega?
ОтветитьI passed calculus 1 with 92% then didn't even get enough to be allowed to take exams for statistics 💀
Ответитьcalcmaxxing
ОтветитьI got confused 😭 I’m a year 10 (9th grader)
ОтветитьThis would've helped me in calculus in uni 😂
ОтветитьBrain nourishment fr
ОтветитьWe can expand the bracket using Binomial Theorem .
ОтветитьWow. I am really dumb.
ОтветитьNice, but I can't substitute U will anything else
ОтветитьI learned this the hard way but when using u-substitution if the u' expression still has the variable in it it has to divide out somehow or it won't work. EX: u = 3^2 + 1 would require an x on the outside of the parenthesis or x * (3x^2+1)^4 for it to work.
ОтветитьObama 🤝 Ortega
ОтветитьYea sorry im to dumb to even understand this 💀
Like what am i even trying to learn bro i barely know algebra
Is this how GenAlpha kids learn math??? 🤣🤣🤣
ОтветитьWe’re making it out of calc 2 with this one 🗣️🔥
ОтветитьObama is NOT that smart.
Ответитьthanks mr president
ОтветитьTf did i just watch?
Ответитьusing linear substitution w can directly integrate it by letting x= 3x+1
which implies
integral (3x+1)^4 dx => {(3x+1)^5}/{3*5} + C
=> {(3x+1)^5}/15 +C
step 2. because the real world doesn't allow for perfect functions, how can we derive a governing differential equation so that after numerical analysis, the result resembles this.
ОтветитьWell if this is how gen alpha learns math, so be it
ОтветитьWhy?
ОтветитьI would have learned this stuff so much easier if I had AI celebrities teaching it to me.
ОтветитьDamn Obama is good in Calculus?
ОтветитьCool I still don't get it
Ответитьdon't be a goofy gooner 🤣🤣🤣
ОтветитьWhy didn't I have AI during my college time? So daaaaamm good to review it years later
Ответитьmanual integration is such a waste of time. Just use mathmatica or wolfram alpha.
ОтветитьThis helped me more than my calculus professor
ОтветитьWtf this is awesome haha
Ответитьpascal triangle taking a break here i see
Ответить"hey ho look"
ОтветитьI can teach Jenna something too. How to get pleasure.
ОтветитьWait this actually makes sense?!!???
Ответитьfriendship ended with chain rule*, now *u-sub is my best friend
ОтветитьU rule? Power rule
ОтветитьThere's a short trick. You can perform the normal integration like when u do with x. It will become (3x-1)^5/5 and then divide it with the coefficient of x that is 3. And get the answer
ОтветитьWTF did I just watch? 😂
ОтветитьHow is this not a lawsuit???
ОтветитьTHis is Goldmine 😅😂
Ответитьthis actually really helped
Ответить