Woo: It's impossible for DOGE to cut government spending without touching the defense budget

Woo: It's impossible for DOGE to cut government spending without touching the defense budget

CNBC Television

54 года назад

19,855 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@LaraeArroyo
@LaraeArroyo - 06.12.2024 08:06

Just watched the video on XAI501x, and I'm convinced this is the next big thing in crypto!

Ответить
@SANFORDOdonnell
@SANFORDOdonnell - 06.12.2024 08:06

Just got my XAI501x tokens! Thanks for the informative video that led me here!

Ответить
@NieshaIbanez
@NieshaIbanez - 06.12.2024 08:06

Invested 10k in elon musk's XAI501x after watching your video and i'm already making profits, super excited!

Ответить
@DONALDHutchison-z1p
@DONALDHutchison-z1p - 06.12.2024 08:06

Bought XAI501x after watching your video, super excited!

Ответить
@RobenaMadison
@RobenaMadison - 06.12.2024 08:06

XAI501x is definitely on my radar now! Appreciate the insights from your video!

Ответить
@SabraKaminski
@SabraKaminski - 06.12.2024 08:06

I honestly think Elon Musk's XAI501x is the safest bet for long term hold, and will survive out of every other altcoins. It will get adopted in US, Ecuador, Asia, starting from Japan, and slowly spread out and gain. This is a winning coin, apart from all the technical greatness.

Ответить
@HeleneBrunner-o6o
@HeleneBrunner-o6o - 06.12.2024 08:06

I’m so glad I found your video about XAI501x! This is going to be better than bitcoin

Ответить
@JEFFPascual-f9f
@JEFFPascual-f9f - 06.12.2024 08:06

Bought XAI501x after watching your video and others, super excited! 💰

Ответить
@daniels.3062
@daniels.3062 - 06.12.2024 09:54

This guy's hands are doing too much.

Ответить
@ibesk47
@ibesk47 - 06.12.2024 10:40

For this guy to say that agent orange understands the intricacies of government spending is laughable. Dude had to have 1 pagers of briefings. The Heratage Foundation is telling him how to move.

Ответить
@prichardgs
@prichardgs - 06.12.2024 11:17

Says a CEO that doesn't pay taxes. How about you pay taxes Woo and get back to me.

Ответить
@boondoggle4820
@boondoggle4820 - 06.12.2024 14:41

DOGE is nonsense, but the bigger problem is that republicans have been lying to their voters for years about taxes and government spending. Republican voters want to cut taxes, protect social security and Medicare, spend more on defense, and balance the budget at the same time, which is total and complete nonsense when you look at the actual budget because “math”, yet their voters think this can be done because they seriously overestimate the amount of money that we spend on things that they don’t like such as money on Ukraine and benefits for immigrants. They really think that the budget can be balanced by cutting just those things. That’s the central problem.

Ответить
@robertbrady3783
@robertbrady3783 - 06.12.2024 18:22

CNBC is a perfect example of what is wrong with the mindset of improving efficiency. Yes, the military can be cut and become more efficient at the same time. when we pay $10,000 for a hammer we can attack these contracts and buy a better hammer for $50. Already the government is raking in savings by self improving its efficiency before Trump's inauguration to front run the DOGE team.. As Woo noted, our Debt to GDP is also key to our printing of fiat out of thin air. We need to improve our GDP by improving job numbers and making improvements in our workforce across all spectrums.

Ответить
@yonathanseleshi
@yonathanseleshi - 06.12.2024 21:58

Congratulations America.. You hired a man who has bankrupted casinos to fix the national debt he already screwed up. Good job.

Ответить
@AKPNW76
@AKPNW76 - 07.12.2024 07:32

Vivek and Elon are much smarter than this commentator. Imagine a rocket that comeback and lands from where it was launched. People have no idea how smart these two men are.

Ответить
@edwardseghini5023
@edwardseghini5023 - 07.12.2024 11:33

If Trump wants to terrified Canada they showed raise how much they'd pay for our goods and cost us more than it used to be.

Ответить
@user-cu1vo8hy
@user-cu1vo8hy - 07.12.2024 13:31

Anything unnecessary in government including defense should be cut. Your not going to believe what we are spending our tax payer money on. Your going to see what kind of nutjobs your voting in Office. For example million dollars to another country so they can put on drag queen shows. You cant make this stuff up. We have homeless veterans on the street. Unexceptable!!

Ответить
@Thejericko17
@Thejericko17 - 07.12.2024 16:59

I hope they cut everything Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Do it in every district across the country. This is what people wanted. Do it.

Ответить
@Williegee9703
@Williegee9703 - 07.12.2024 17:52

Seems very strange that people are against tax cuts and cutting out the corrupt spending of our government.

Ответить
@FluffyAlpaca81
@FluffyAlpaca81 - 07.12.2024 17:56

So basically under trump, no wars, cool

Ответить
@DankNstien
@DankNstien - 07.12.2024 20:43

There is no way they can accomplish what they speak of without making massive cuts to social security and Medicare

Ответить
@DankNstien
@DankNstien - 07.12.2024 20:44

Think about this Elon musk and ramaswamy want to get rid of the consumer protection agency doesn't that tell you something about their motivations

Ответить
@mtmitchell34
@mtmitchell34 - 07.12.2024 21:05

This guy won’t mention that one way out is to increase taxes on the rich! TAXES for rich and corporations are at a historical low!

Ответить
@juliescott5017
@juliescott5017 - 07.12.2024 21:28

Right if we cut defense spending countries like China, North Korea, Iran, and Russia are just going to leave us alone. If you believe that I have some ocean front property in Arizona for sale if you’re interested 😂

Ответить
@adelmomontero3554
@adelmomontero3554 - 07.12.2024 23:11

If we reduced the size of military, the US would have plenty of workers thus reducing immigration.

Ответить
@MendicantBias1
@MendicantBias1 - 07.12.2024 23:37

Guess America still wants to beta test a Trump presidency

Ответить
@abrakkehakka1357
@abrakkehakka1357 - 08.12.2024 01:38

Add the deportation costs that will be on par with the defense spendings. DOGE will have to cut all defense spendings to be successful. And Musk: forget everything space…

Ответить
@BlakWiseCracker
@BlakWiseCracker - 08.12.2024 05:24

WTF!! What does this boot licker” considers entitlements.

Ответить
@timothyluckey5020
@timothyluckey5020 - 08.12.2024 17:25

This is the reason why Trump won. Nobody trust the lies of the liberal media. 😢

Ответить
@frankdleads
@frankdleads - 08.12.2024 17:50

Argentina has 18% inflation. Is that the Christmas gift from plans to deliver?

Ответить
@antifoxist
@antifoxist - 08.12.2024 18:07

After WWII the US Debt declined year-in year-out for decades through Republican and Democratic administrations from about 110% of GDP at the end of WWII to 30% of GDP by the time of Reagan's election. Then, on January 20 1981, Ronald Reagan was inaugurated on a promise to eliminate the national debt (which was unnecessary at the time) by CUTTING TAXES, that was where it all fell apart. Since that time, up until today, Republican's matra is "cut taxes, cut taxes, cut taxes....." even until today when the one thing you can count on Trump to do is CUT TAXES. The data is available, 90% of the explosion in debt from 30% of GDP in 1981 to 120% of GDP now was accumulated under Republican presidents.

Are Americans so stupid that they are going to listen to this Woo person and nod their head, "Oh yeah, he's smart".

Ответить
@imperialmotoring3789
@imperialmotoring3789 - 08.12.2024 19:22

Defense Dept can cut all DEI spending, cut all Drag Queen events, and stop transing soldiers. That will save a LOT of taxpayer money.

Ответить
@thepragmaticfarmer6308
@thepragmaticfarmer6308 - 08.12.2024 20:29

It is astounding how many people actually believe if we just cut welfare, education and a few other discretionary budgets we would suddenly be on the road to a budget surplus. There are only two ways the US can get out of this mess. First, cut off Americans at their knees and completely gut social security and medicare while making dramatic cuts to military spending. This would cripple a majority of Americans and make things unbearably uncomfortable for ALOT of people. Second, hold the top 5% accountable and make them pay their fair share while also holding the legislative branch accountable to making more strategic budget cuts and stop feeding contractors with inflated payments. Instead of the CEOs and shareholders getting 5 vacation homes they might only get 4 while the rest of America can still get groceries and pay rent. Cutting spending alone is not going to solve anything and tariffs are giant leap to absolutely nowhere.

Ответить
@robtopham6095
@robtopham6095 - 08.12.2024 22:36

DOGE can't cut government spending without congressional approval... PERIOD!!!! So what is going to be?

Ответить
@sc6677
@sc6677 - 08.12.2024 23:09

It’s a sad time but I’ll get through it laughing at the people I know who voted for him who somehow believe they will be singled out to not get screwed with the rest of us😂

Ответить
@poopster1100
@poopster1100 - 09.12.2024 00:13

Doge is a political stunt

Ответить
@ekMMT2024
@ekMMT2024 - 09.12.2024 00:26

Ridiculous. Why not instead REDUCE the percentage of GDP compared to our debt and interest paid by that debt by implementing fiscal policies that increase our GDP and GDP growth? There were about six periods in our history where we aggressively tried to pay down our debt and what happened next was a depression. There was also a time where we were being isolationists, we introduced tariffs and we tried to pay down our debt. It lead to a deepening of the Great Depression, and more jobs being lost. Buckle up America

Ответить
@ekMMT2024
@ekMMT2024 - 09.12.2024 00:27

Ridiculous. Why not instead REDUCE the percentage of GDP compared to our debt and interest paid by that debt by implementing fiscal policies that increase our GDP and GDP growth? There were about six periods in our history where we aggressively tried to pay down our debt and what happened next was a depression. There was also a time where we were being isolationists, we introduced tariffs and we tried to pay down our debt. It lead to a deepening of the Great Depression, and more jobs being lost. Buckle up America

Ответить
@ekMMT2024
@ekMMT2024 - 09.12.2024 00:28

Do a better job with the people you have on air CNBC. Maybe teach your listeners how money works in a system that can issue its own currency. Our media is awful

Ответить
@ge0rgeharris218
@ge0rgeharris218 - 09.12.2024 02:27

This so-called doge hasn't any power and isn't even apart of the government! It has no power whatsoever and it's doubtful if he could even make the necessary connections as to how these budget items connect! He one of the biggest quacks on every subject under the sun! That's why he went nowhere in the Presidential Primaries! He's a goof and thats all he'll ever be, a goof!

Ответить
@JoanGreen
@JoanGreen - 09.12.2024 15:22

Why do unelected private citizens running any gov't agencies or cutting any budget??? No one voted for them!!!

Ответить
@romanyel
@romanyel - 09.12.2024 17:36

Yeah, don't touch the bloated Defense budget but cut programs like ssi, education, FDA etc. How about taxing the top 1% a little more?

Ответить
@BillyPecord
@BillyPecord - 10.12.2024 01:36

All these talking heads are worried about their woke dem friends who will be out of a job, idiots.

Ответить
@shirleyandrews1152
@shirleyandrews1152 - 10.12.2024 02:04

I’m so scared‼️🙀 At 83 I never tho’t my gov’mt would turn on me😪

Ответить
@Mike7734-r2g
@Mike7734-r2g - 11.12.2024 02:21

Why is it so important??? If you have to ask that question, you have no clue what you are talking about?

Ответить
@KrystleJennings-g2g
@KrystleJennings-g2g - 12.12.2024 22:17

To: Mr. Musk and Mr. Ramaswamy....
To: RFK Jr. and HHS ........
Each year, the federal government apportions federal funds, taxpayers money, to states, with the primary objective of preserving family welfare. This monetary assistance is designed as a social safety net for families, not as a political or financial bargaining chip, where the state could potentially misuse its authority and connections, thereby violating parents and children's inherent rights. Unless there are clear instances of abuse or neglect that necessitate criminal charges, the state should not meddle in the private affairs of any family. However, the reality is that the state and courts have become dependent on this Federal financial aid.
The court system, enticed by the prospect of this Federal funding, often resorts to deceptive and unlawful tactics to remove children from their homes. The entire process is tainted with illegality due to the disregard for fundamental and inherent rights. These rights are not trivial; they are of paramount importance. They demand, both legally and morally, a rigorous examination under the "strict scrutiny standard" and an elevated degree of protection. This heightened level of safeguarding is not only morally essential for these fundamental familial rights but is also mandated by law.
When a group of legal professionals neglect their duty to protect the rights of the family for the sake of job security, political maneuvering, and Federal funding, it transforms into a racketeering operation that exploits vulnerable children for profit. This not only devastates families but also triggers a host of psychological disorders in all parties involved. This is abuse, and yes, it calls for criminal charges. However, victims' pleas fall on deaf ears as law enforcement turns a blind eye to the documented evidence, due to an unspoken immunity with other government agencies, and the benefits of the fraudulent Federal funding.
While this letter may not pinpoint the exact destination of the federal taxpayer's money, many victims of this atrocity can certainly tell you where the funding is not being directed. The Federal funds are not being channeled towards families, children, or the protection of fundamental human rights. The reality is that the state, courts, attorneys, foster parents, and even service providers are all motivated to support the agency's agenda, even creating criminal falsehoods to destroy families, due to the federal funding provided.
These entities, including the agency, courts, and attorneys, perpetuate this situation because they all benefit financially. The agency even incorporates service providers into the federal funding process. As long as they can distribute federal money, they will have a loyal following of providers, associates, and supporters. But the price is our children and our mental health, our liberty, our family traditions, heritage, customs, and our very belief systems. The federal government is funding this to the tune of billions annually, as this country could apply those funds elsewhere in its overworked budget. In Tennessee, the state has received over $200 million each year for well over a decade, yet requests even more money each year.
One of the most significant instances of fraudulent activity against the federal government, in relation to its funding, is the pervasive disregard for due process. This is a requirement explicitly stipulated by state statutes and involves the protection of fundamental rights, necessitating additional efforts and meticulous scrutiny.
In the state of Tennessee, for instance, the law unequivocally mandates a preliminary hearing within a 72-hour window and an adjudicatory hearing within a span of 30 days. The latter, under no circumstances, should exceed a 90-day period. However, in my capacity as a family advocate in Tennessee, I have yet to observe or gain knowledge of these statutes being upheld by either the court or the relevant agency.
When the rights of a family hang in the balance, the situation not only warrants but legally necessitates a comprehensive examination of the rights accorded to the family. This is irrespective of any "compelling state interests" that may be implicated. The statutes have been established to alleviate the detrimental effects that instability can inflict on children.
Regrettably, these critical mandated time frames are habitually overlooked. This letter challenges the state agency or judiciary to furnish any evidence of compliance with these timeline statutes. The consistent disregard for these crucial timeframes is not only a violation of the law but also a disservice to the families and children who rely on the system for justice and protection, however, these statutory time frames are often ignored, while more participants are included to receive a "piece of the pie", at taxpayers expense, while defrauding the U.S. Government of the funding
The importance of these statutes cannot be overstated. They serve as a safeguard, ensuring that the rights of families are not trampled upon in the name of bureaucratic convenience. It is incumbent upon the state agency and judiciary to uphold these statutes, not only in letter but in spirit, to ensure that justice is served promptly and effectively. When these statutes are not upheld, the federal funding should be stopped immediately.
In conclusion, the disregard for due process, as mandated by state statutes, is a significant fraud against the federal government and its funding. It is a matter that requires immediate attention and rectification. As a family advocate, I implore the relevant authorities to uphold these statutes and ensure that the rights of families are protected, as is their legal and moral obligation.

Ответить
@markwhitman860
@markwhitman860 - 14.12.2024 16:25

Wow you guys really missed it. No wonder people quit listening to progressive news.

Ответить
@independent5359
@independent5359 - 17.12.2024 18:10

They could raise taxes on rich

Ответить
@paultaylor6426
@paultaylor6426 - 17.12.2024 19:15

Top to bottom revision of all 501(c) nonprofit regulations should be a DOGE priority. As Krauthammer said, "nonprofits are out of control quasi-governmental organizations." Our 1.5 million NOPs have become partisan and subversive -- wielding $6 trillion in assets.

Ответить