Joel garner controversal over vs australia

The Yorker is all he was waiting for....

Brilliant bowler.

why misleading title to boos yr viewership :(

The four were what they were!
However, 'they' wouldn't have been 'they' without Jeffrey Dujon.

Controversial, my arse!

Over the period of times , life of batsman has been eased drastically…i think being a bowler in 70 , 80 , 90 s was as fascinating as a batsman …if not more ..their was kind of flamboyancy associated being a fast bowler running through bowling bouncers giving hard time to batsman …icc rules has ruled it out from cricket …it wonders how much bats are improved these days ..so much that you can’t even compare with that era …batsman can choose any bat in this world and come up with personnel bats …but bowlers can only have bowl that too chosen by icc …and rules are such they have to treat it like sacred thing …and in that era that inswing fast bowling was part of that fascinating bowling culture …that spunk which was great to watch ..what people cherish or enjoy … and every cricketer of that era will accept that bowl tempering was part of that in swing art which is now diminished because of rules …Howcome batsman be allowed to have any bat or any kind of bat but bowlers to have same old ball …looks unfair.. ….I think to bring a spark in cricket and realive that flamboyancy fast bowling …icc should let the bowlers to tamper the bowl after 30 overs in limited cricket and after 60 till second ball change in test cricket and same in t20( or discussing it with cricketers of that era and this era , can bring such changes) …to have bowler leverage something out of same old piece of bowl …tampering should be atleat as much as bowlers do at that era…like seem should allowed be tamper ..shine with salvia ..kind of power play thing to bowlers …they have something to leverage …batsman these days are about to reach highest scores in odi around 250 and 400 in test 150 in t20 …bowlers still have only at most 10 wickets to take like ever and ever …that infuse of ball tempering will give some resistance to batting being evolved …and will re alive …that art of in-swing fast bowling …that people loved …to give bowlers something to garnish …that would make cricket more interesting ..will make bowling aspect..as important and integral part of cricket …

So neither controversial nor an over?

Nobody Missed Colin Craft 😢.

Controversial?

When it comes to these fearsome WI fast bowlers, there was this dull joke making rounds that when the umpire calls "No ball" on a delivery , the batsman who had failed to even spot the ball goes "I knew that! There wasn't any ball in the first place" . Dumb joke but watching that kind of speed, you will be excused to crack that one 😅

Absolutely nothing wrong with that over. Do not forget that there were many Aussie 'quicks' at the time who had no problem bouncing a delivery into the chest of a late order batsman. Garner played very fair with the tail enders.

Heading is Headache

Hmm - why was it controversial?

Was a good bowler especially with his yorkers and bouncers but not other worldy like Marshall, Steyn, Amram

BIG BIRD.

May be they think that Big Bird should go soft with the tailenders!😂

Anglosaxons term everything controversial if they can't control them😅😅😅

Brilliant wicket keeping

Australians fearing in front of West Indies deadly attack😂

😮

What about inhuman Thomson and Lillee? They intentionally target batsman head not wickets. What about that being "controversial"?

Absolutely no controversial over!

Best of Best Batsmen struggled to score runs against the fiery bowling of Big Bird

Joel andy Holder marshal Ambrose walse were most dangerous fast bowlers of west indies in world cricket history ever

It is ok as long as he is not chucking.

Click bait

Such a pleasure seeing Big Bird operate on a fast/bouncy pitch. He could do both the strike as well as the stock bowling job when he bowled bouncy medium pace with the old ball and kept the runs down better than almost anyone in that role.

Best keeping jefry duljine

Perfect , excellent over no space for controversy .

Sir Joel GARNER!👊🏽😇🙏🏽

Nice

"Steady flow of batsman at the moment..."😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅 It's taken me 36 years to appreciate the commentary of Ian Chappell. In one interview, he said that a good captain is one who'll tell his mate that the umpire is bonkers and go say something similar to the umpire about his mate. I used to think Ian Chappell can't be trusted. But, now, yeah, he's pretty good. Perhaps the time he played that was the beat approach to leadership.

Thank u to all the women in the Chappell family for manufacturing Greg, Ian and Trevor Chappell.🙏

Superb bowler. One of the best of all time but dont understand why this is titled controversial..

My favourite Joel Garner🎉😊

Stupid video

Controversial? Not even a no ball!

His bowling to tail ender's, big deal,

The second delivery is an excellent one

Big Bird ! What a delight to watch him ! Pure Magic ! We will never able to have like another one in our life our time !

Nothing controversial… excellent bowling… unplayable bowling is not known as controversial

Controversial over❌... Controversial tumbnail✅

Thumbs down

Click bait

As the strong black genes decrease, so is West Indies' cricket, lol

Nothing controversial about it...

What was controversial about it, you foolish??

Outrageously controversial..................bowler should never be allowed to bowl like that!

Seriously what is so controversial about it,it was just top class bowling by a fine bowler

Such a great baller difficult to find again is living simple life gumnaami zindagi and see our irpu pothon just a... of garner how luxuriously..