Комментарии:
Cancel NY Times
ОтветитьIf the law allow this… the law MUST change
ОтветитьBetween her and Trump, I lost faith in humanity.
ОтветитьJudge need to be investigated!
ОтветитьPride comes before destruction; a haughty spirit before a fall.
Have faith, friends! Evil will never prevail.
I strongly believe that justice will prevail for Justin. Blake and Ryan have already lost in their image in the public eye and it’s unlikely based on people’s experience of the couple don’t want to work with them anymore. The judge has been brought one way or another. I am hopeful that whilst this may feel like a loss for Justin in the short term, the long term impact on Kaleesi and the dragons is a massive loss.
ОтветитьThis is chess. We thought Baldoni was winning last week. Yesterday Blake thinks she is winning. This is chess. Freedman does have the necessary information from Taylor Swift. Brittany Mahomes said that Blake had wanted to have sex with Justin but he did not want to. So the needed information is probably in line with that. Texts--you know how girls texts. They might add extra things in for laughs. Freedman could file sexual harrassment for Justin. The inappropriate sexual interest adds to the tortuous claims. She was not acting professional. Blake might settle to not get those texts out there. So we are not done. We are only done with Blake and Ryan.
ОтветитьI agree that the NYT shouldn’t have been sued for defamation for just doing their job— which is to report the news. They didn’t say Justin was or wasn’t guilty, they simply reported what Blake was suing him for. That’s fair play.
It’s however bogus that Justin isn’t allowed to sue Blake for defamation. He’s been dropped by his agency and other movies, before he’s even been convicted of a crime. How is that NOT defamation?
I hate when bullies win… and they win often. It’s horrible for humanity.
ОтветитьJust to be clear Perez. The judge did not say that no defamation occurred, his ruling emphasize that JB could not bring defamation claims under the law.
Those are two very different things. Just like he cannot bring extortion claims under the law. Nonetheless Megan’s reputation as a report is also tarnished - along with BL and RR
THE NEW YORK TIMES SUCKS!!!
ОтветитьSomeone needs to check this judges accounts and see wth just happened bc it was all good until now. Which reminds me they as in fake lively hired a guy that "USED" to work for the CIA and now a judge changes their minds and crushes Justin's hopes of a real defense. I'm so pissed about this bias ass judge. Pathetic AF!
ОтветитьStockbroker Daddy Scott Swift paid the judge or else Blake Lively will exposed that Taylor Swift is not a victim and that she helped her destroy him.
ОтветитьNYT, Blake, Ryan, theyre all frauds!!!! Never supporting them 👎🏽
ОтветитьGasp, could it be the Blake isn’t the monster she’s being portrayed as? Women are so often demonized. I’m not a fan, but I don’t understand the intense hate.
ОтветитьAll this is so sad and I do not how we are going to recover from this hard punch on our hearts. I wish I could give a hug to Justin and all his legal team... Sending so much love to all 💜
Ответить💔💔💔💔💔
ОтветитьF*ck the NYT. They're a rag.
ОтветитьBut! We already know thr NYT was NOT fair, nor true!! It was created months prior to the Cali Human rights report!! This judge is dirty 😡
Ответить"honest reporting"???!!! that's exactly the opposite of what they did. the gaslighting is off the charts!!!
ОтветитьI think this case has opened the eyes of so many people to show even "respected" journalism like the NYT is in fact just as manipulative, biased and corrupt as other less traditionally respected media outlets. They may be victorious now but they have rendered an overall loss for journalism as a whole. I've become very sceptical and look more to various types of reporting to find the truth and I think that's the fascination of this case.
ОтветитьI'm disgusted by our society. I hope the Judge gets disbarred for his OBVIOUS corruption.
ОтветитьIs it a win when you buy it🤔
ОтветитьThey’ve jst lost more reputation over this, they’re going to get closer to tabloid style
ОтветитьIt's all so disheartening.
Ответить@PerezHilton You already look tired and fed up 😂😂😂😂
ОтветитьMoney talks......the lunch with Selma Hyak, presumably another "dragon" seems to have paid off.......
Baldoni needs to stick with by his guns and defend himself in court.
Bide his time and face the allegations in front of a jury where hopefully the truth will come out.
I hate this kind of power.....ordinary folk can't afford to defend themselves against millionaires and billionaires.
I do wonder what man will want to work opposite BL again.......
Boycott the N.Y. Times
ОтветитьThe really messed up part is that she in NO way won a SH claim!! He was NEVER found guilty of that so not sure why she’s celebrating so hard!! She even withdrew her emotional distress claims so why is she still spreading lies that she’s speaking for woman of abuse!! I’m soooo upset about all this
ОтветитьWhen will WE as a people stand together and CANCEL watching movies and shows with these corrupt people. QUIT buying The NY Times.
ОтветитьI WILL NEVER SUPPORT THE NEW YORK TIMES EVER AGAIN.
ОтветитьThis just goes to show that almost all judges are subject to deep pockets. It's no coincidence that this case fell on him. The Hollywood deep pockets and all the businesses Ryan is involved him needed him to win so they ensured this by putting Liman on the case. I never thought I'd say this but Liman is just as corrupt and scared as all the others. These Hollywood players better NEVER complain of Trump again - I DON'T WANT TO HEAR IT FROM THEM! I don't like the prez but these hypocrites have no right to criticize him.
ОтветитьYou have been so depressed perez since baldoni has been dismissed.
ОтветитьPoor Perez I feel ya
ОтветитьDisgusted
ОтветитьYes😢 I’m here for the group therapy. We’re all heartbroken, but It’s going to be ok everyone. Hugs to you all and especially to you Perez. Thank you for being our #1 source for everything
ОтветитьCan the NY Times say bad things about Justin now? Could that be considered defamation at this point?
ОтветитьToo late for the NYT for this statement. We all know now how unreliable and misleading their reporting is. Thank you BL for exposing this!!!! Bravo!!!🙌
ОтветитьUpdate: we know now it is 4 claims now, not 2. I’m sorry babes! Zack Peter seems bummed about this outcome still too :( :( . I’m sorry for you both. I hope you feel better. You know we r in this to fight therefore there will be disappointments along the way😢
ОтветитьThe NY Times should have reported the facts of what happened in a regular news article format and not written a personal response. No one wanted to hear from them personally. No one likes big media rn for crap like this
ОтветитьNYT is a propaganda rag.
ОтветитьI can't even go to work for the past 24 hours. I feel so defeated cuz I invested so much time on this case. Sending love to JB and his family, the Wayfarer Co and esp you Perez for awlays reporting ❤
At this point i only believe in Karma.
he can go forth with 4 of his 7 claims against her, that's what Brian Freeman said.
ОтветитьJustice for Justin is to stay away as far from Hollywood as he possibly can. It’s an evil entity. He can make movies that inspire real people. Hollywood is on the path to destroy itself. There is corruption in the legal system… there are privatized prisons all over America with the disadvantaged sentenced by judges who are bought! Why would this judge be any different?
ОтветитьDo we even believe in NY TIMES anymore??
ОтветитьI hope he has same standards when justin asks for dismissal from her case.. i wonder if he will though considering everything is linked to sh claims.. even blake lively legal team said they hv no proof.. so hr can try to get it dimissrd . Question is why hasnt he even asked that..
ОтветитьAs a journalist who hasn't even graduated yet, im held to a much higher research standard than the NYT seems to be anymore. It's important to have multiple credible sources (minimum two) even if they are in opposition, which would only be more cause for research and additional credible sources (especially in what's clearly opinion writing). Also, it's not hard to tell when evidence is edited, or texts are incomplete. As anyone can delete selective texts from their phone, that can't ethically be the basis of a whole piece without confirmation (not from one single source) that they are truthful and accurate. In some cases a little bias (towards serious things) can be okay, but reporting should always still be fair and accurate.
ОтветитьSo funny to hear your voice so low, even saga was almost a whisper.
ОтветитьThe judge is the most disgusting and corrupt person on the planet.
ОтветитьThanks! for all your updates Perez ! we appreciate your effort! i am devastated because justice system falied Justin . i am still praying for the best
Ответить