Комментарии:
So what is that thing being fed by the dorsal intake? 3rd engine of some kind? (it's a dedicated strike aircraft probs though.. not a fighter.. but gnarly anyway.. just in time to destabilise the world when it's just very stable as well! Fucking China! (but well done as well for the cool plane!)
ОтветитьThank you, much much.
ОтветитьPoor commies coming out with tech we deemed obsolete 70 years ago, oh wow a tailless design!? Ever heard of the B-2?
Dumb commie fucks
Poor China still making planes that barely fly!!! LOL they are only about 50 years behind.
ОтветитьThis is not a fighter but bomber. There is new actual fighter and its not uniwing.
ОтветитьIt has three engines because China can't yet produce engines powerful enough to only have two. It had taken US 50 years to develop the stealth aircraft China's isn't anywhere near as sophisticated as they have only been developing for 20 years. Even if they are hacking skunkworks!
Ответитьyou guys in comments never watch more than 2 minutes of the video lol, this is apparently more of a bomber design than a fighter, and I don't know what yall are yapping about with all the politics, so much mental garbage
ОтветитьOne should believe this. China gives out honest intelligence on their military very true and accurate
ОтветитьIt's a POS. Not 6th gen.
ОтветитьWhen seeing American netizens still talking about the authenticity of China's sixth-generation fighter, their own sixth-generation fighter is still at the PPT stage, but some Americans are still sober, because the sixth-generation fighter you see is real, no matter how you fantasize, it is there staring at you, of course, mass production and maturity will be a few years later
ОтветитьSince when are bombers included in the category of sixth-generation aircraft, the Americans are so shameless for face
ОтветитьI don’t understand the big deal. The US tested a 6th gen fighter over four years ago. This isn’t anything groundbreaking.
ОтветитьCh1na is WOEFULLY understated by Amer1cans (in general). Theyve come INCREDIBLY FAR in only 30 yrs time. They now (INDISPUTABLE fact) lead in most critical areas of technology, and have made leaps and bounds in military tech as well. Now, they possess wpns that the west simply doesnt have. Also fact. Also: their military industrial capacity (also civil) is second to none. They have the largest (by a massive gulf) industrial base on earth. In total war, without nukes, Ch1na would absolutely dominate. Russ1a has shown this, as the west has been single-handedly depleted of vital ammunition stocks & some platform-types by just Russ1a alone.
ОтветитьFortunately, technology is in the hands of civilization
ОтветитьI dont think the USA should worry too much. The inside is likely cold war era technology that China reuses from the USSR.
ОтветитьThe Pentagon thought about the countermeasures for several nights and finally chose to modify Wikipedia.😂
ОтветитьSo china boasted this aircraft as 6th gen fighter eh they're out of their mind seems the aircraft is the same as j20 capability though the difference is the design of the aircraft.
Ответитьwhy talk about a plane in a completely unrelated video?does it mean the influence of these fighter prototypes are catastrophic?
Ответить吹牛逼鸡😂 中国人造的垃圾 跟你的破英文一样
ОтветитьLet's see if Sharma Palki agrees with this informations.
Ответитьmeh . made in china sticker renders this plane useless
ОтветитьWhat is likely to make it to 6th gen fighters:
Twin side-oriented GaN radars instead of one front facing AESA in the nose (although it's not really front facing in reality, it can be rotated), overlapping their scan angle to the front and fixing the issue of not being able to have an effective scan coverage on the sides autonomously despite the passive sensors allowing data fusion and data links which can't always be relied upon 100% of the time. GaN radars are said to have less energy consumption, more performance, less vulnerable to jamming, smaller form factor, so overall it does everything better simply put which could perhaps allow the installation of two instead of one radar, but it's going to cost a lot if that's the case and replacing or maintaining two radars for one aircraft is a technical challenge. So these possibly two "AESA" radars are probably not traditional AESA radars but GaN in fact. Traditional AESAs occupy too much volume inside the chassis.
All with a complement of other antennas in the wings and/or fuselage, tail.
Top mounted intake to reduce the radar cross section and allow more spacious weapon bays below, possibly to carry stand-off weapons in the future and an absurd amount of small diameter bombs and more BVRAAMs.
Variable Cycle Engines (confirmed for the european NGF along thrust vectoring at this stage).
"Older" generation features along present day ones: cloud combat servers, UCAVs, more jammers, towed decoys...
Likely to reuse delta and diamond wing designs because those offer better supersonic performance, and better stalling when compensated with various leading-edge extensions and electronics. Maybe a flying wing of some sort such as this prototype, maybe an hybrid of the two.
I'm sorry but I don't buy any of it.
This fixed gear airplane is a hollow hull. Landing gear off a gurney, engines out of a J-8 trainer, analog dials & gauges. It is most likely nothing more than a project put together by Engineering students completing a final year thesis. Like civil engineers building a bridge with ice cream sticks/tongue depressors.
As in the West: April Fools Day = China: New Years Fool Day.
It reminds me of the Boeing proposal for the f35
ОтветитьThanks to Marx's open source
ОтветитьDumb Americans: so what’s this a copy of?
ОтветитьAs engineer its design is comical . Placement of the intake behind the cockpit is crazy as well . The wing design is super inefficient. This is simply propaganda at this point . More like a science project
ОтветитьB-21或成银杏叶首飞最大受益者
ОтветитьAll stollen tech.
Ответитьmade of a kite.
ОтветитьThis thing is as real as all the other "six generation fighters" soviet block nations have "created"
ОтветитьDoes it fly faster than the C929? Is it smaller than the ARJ21 and C919?
ОтветитьMach 6
Ответить@eurasia naval, saw your interview with Siming Lan. I have a lot of respect of your analysis and unbiased views. I seriously hope that there will be peace at the Taiwan Straits forever. Call me a pacifist, I don’t care as long as it saves lives. With the right policies and engagement, there can be unification without wars. It starts with talking, with understanding, with humility, with perseverance. Does not matter even if talk lasts donkey years; better than throwing lives away
Ответитьhuh your analysis makes no sense as control services are imaginary
ОтветитьIt has double-wheeled rear landing gear and 3 engines: more than a fighter it looks like a light fast stealth bomber... if it's not a fake...
I think the targhet of this prototype is to reach mach 3... Maybe the designers saw TopGun Maverick...😅
Paper tiger! please you wouldn’t show if off in a neighborhood you make it a surprise with a fleet if you’re trying to get a reaction with substance!
ОтветитьInvest in lockhead Martin now!!😂😂
ОтветитьThe china fighter jets is substandard not yet provent in the war history for desplayed only like toys
ОтветитьAll I want to know is who is going to the Hague for developing Kung-Po Chicken?
ОтветитьA triple engine indicates that the J36 is a hybrid fighter jet / space craft that's capable of flying in low earth orbit.
ОтветитьImagine if all this effort and money was put into peace
Ответить😂🤣😂🤣😂 6th gen huh? Good luck with that lol
ОтветитьHahaha👎
ОтветитьIt's powered by DJI electric motors.😊😅
ОтветитьThats just a j16 with a body kit😂
ОтветитьChina mind games going on here
ОтветитьThe mighty flying dorito
Ответить