Комментарии:
I love this comparison!
I hope that Dalle 3 can improve its photorealistic capabilities in the future.
True! Midjourney style is conventional, no surprise it is very good with realistic images. I like DALL E 3 more because it is more experimental, and I get more ideas from it.
ОтветитьThis was very well produced and presented!
ОтветитьMidjourney images seem spirited. As if theres a wise creative soul crafting them. Its wild. And spooky.
ОтветитьGreat summary actually. No fluff, just the information, and at an appropriate pacing. Even the music was decent.
ОтветитьI really hope Dall-e will improve realistic looking images as midjourney's images looks amazingly real.
ОтветитьI thought both were good... the Dalle is more 3D-type drawing, while the MidJourney is more realistic... so for me I like the realism more MidJourney is better.
ОтветитьYou are REALLY really biased towards Dall-E :D Even in the comments you reply to all people that disagree trying to argue your point! :D I would have give most points to MidJourney. The pop art by MidJourney was pretty bad though.
ОтветитьHow's character consistency and art consistency?
ОтветитьI'm using Limeware
ОтветитьLogo Design - DALL-E is much better
ОтветитьMid journey is opposed with realism 😂😂😂
ОтветитьSo im curious. Does Dalle learn to create better or more accurate images through people using it and trying to give more detailed prompts or is it just updated by the developers to gain more accuracy?
ОтветитьMid Journey's ultra-realistic images are breathtaking
Ответить😮😮
ОтветитьAre these apps or websites or both? How can know I'm downloading the correct apps ?
ОтветитьPhoto-realistic is 100 better in MidJourney!!!
Ответитьbiased bruh
ОтветитьMid journey has much stronger atmosphere.
Ответитьthat is the problem in most ai image generation they look cartoon and shiny they cant beat midjourney
ОтветитьDall-E's photorealistic photos look cartoonish around the eyes...and what on earth was with the first woman's jaw line?
ОтветитьMidjourney is just good for realism. Chat-GPT is a lot more accurate with the prompt input
Ответитьdisagree, at this comparison its a clear tie
ОтветитьBing gives you like 4 pictures
ОтветитьAlthough Dall-e was more accurate I think Midjourney is far more pleasing to the eye overall.
ОтветитьDalle3 740.000$ in 4 months they used the generation and made money on them, at that time 5.400.000$ midjourney. Here's a simple analysis from stock photos.
ОтветитьThe video is good. Kindly add one more point which is probably the decider for a lot of stakeholders that AI image generator caters to. And that point is "RESOLUTION". Dall E 3 can only generate images on 1024X1024, whereas Midjourney can generate images at a given resolution. I already had Midjourney, after seeing this video I thought of trying Dall E 3, now I'm stuck with this "RESOLUTION" limitation which pretty much renders all the edge Dalle E had over Midjourney futile.
ОтветитьDALL-E 3 photorealism is not "nice". it's absolutely horrible.
ОтветитьI've tried Dall E. It is good especially paired with CHAT GPT but I have unsubscribed after 5 days because despite being good at following text prompts, I find the images it create (realistic) look rather bland and unrealistic. It is much cheaper, but looking at MJ results, I think I'm gonna give it a try
ОтветитьGUYS GUYS u all are saying DALL E can’t do photo realism and while Midjouney is better, DALL E 3 can do VERY realistic images if you prompt it with like a simple “A dog” or tell chat gpt to prompt DALL E with “A dog” TRUST ME you will like the results. You can also use my custom GPT FutureFusion which can make better DALL E images!
ОтветитьOops..!!! Page not found!
ОтветитьLooks like realism is for midjourney and cartoon/abstract or any kind of art goes to Dall-E
ОтветитьI like Midjourney more but the Dall-3 images look more useable for a thumbnail.
ОтветитьWho likes Dall-e 3
👇
DALL-E 3 won't do for photos of any kind. It always makes them look like CGI renders with exaggerated smoothing and lighting effects.
ОтветитьDall-e is not free.
ОтветитьAll AI images are copied from photos and illustrations!
ОтветитьBiased. I think Midjourney win or at least it's a tie. If you want a fair competition the testing method shoud be fair too.
ОтветитьDall-E 3 is well ahead. Not perfect, but much better accuracy in listening to your prompt. Great video, thank you.
ОтветитьThank you. Midjourney is great with photorealistic faces, but too creepy-looking because of the machine's way to interpret emotions, or god forbid, hands, lol. I just joined Midjourney and my prompt was "a happy clown holding a paper (with a message). And that clown is straight out from horror movies, as creepy and psychotic as can be. And the simple words are messed up and not legible. Midjourney is a strange mix of amazing, creepy, and inspiring. I'm gettin Dall-e next.
ОтветитьDall e sucks, a lot of limiting
ОтветитьThank you so much for this video! It helped a lot!
ОтветитьFirst point goes to DALL.E maybe in terms of understanding context better, but I definitely think the images generated by Midjourney where waaay more detailed and creative.
ОтветитьMid journey is clearly the winner.
Checkout Flux 1 vs DallE 3 on data science in your pocket
Here's why this is not accurate. each of these platforms LEARN based on previous inputs, so your outputs are very dependent on what you've used the platform for previously. for example; if you mainly looked for painterly styles on MJ, when you type in "pixel art" its more likely to skew results toward painterly still.. and Dall-e is the same, and is also dependent on anything chatgpt knows about your interests. So each person's results are gonna be skewed from this
ОтветитьDalle 3 is for kids
ОтветитьAnybody else out there that draws like myself think that the midjurney drawings were far superior?
Ответитьgran canal😊
ОтветитьI'll rather take Midjourney :)
Ответить