Комментарии:
Did he purposely wear a shirt that matched thr wall? 🤣
The king james bible only thing is ridiculous, a lingering mentality from catholicism that tried to keep the scriptures hidden in a dead language. Old english isnt english anymore, when there's so many words that aren't words anymore, that meanings can't be interpreted clearly without doing research into old english.
Do Germans have the same debate? Is Martin Luther's original German translation put above modern German translations? They would be in the same boat, their language has changed as much as English over 500 years, every language does.
One credit I must give old english, is that it has a different word for "you" when referring to an individual singular (you), or individuals plural (ye)
Modern english doesn't differentiate between plural and singular intent when you say "you"
Southern slang is correct, "yall" is a real word, reintroducing a plural 😆
Inerrant Word of God, we have the preserved Word of God.
Okay, in 2023 which translation is CORRECT in English for Exodus 25? Simple question, got an answer?
What is so sad, is this fine Christian man states something he doesn't believe.....
My question to him is, please, please hand me a 'copy' of this perfect, infallible, inerrant and inspired word of God you say you believe in?
Where, in any translation, does it say the 'originals' are perfect and infallible?
It is so sad to hear a person like him.... So sad!
This man doesn't know the issues..... Saved, yes... 'Bible' believer, no......
Beware of anyone trying to downplay the kjv. Much more transliteration in newer versions.
ОтветитьKJV only. All others are per-versions.
ОтветитьHeretical. The KJB is the only true Bible.
ОтветитьYou can't hold to Bible inerrancy and believe that Majority Text Bibles, Minority Text Bibles, and the Septuagint are all inerrant. They have different words included, not included, and changed between those three Bibles. You have to decide which Bible is God's actual word and the Majority Text Bibles such as the KJV as the archeology and lack of contradictions within it to show it's genuine.
ОтветитьIs God the author of confusion?this is a logical question
ОтветитьThe English speaking peoples been having a good run for last 400 years,interesting 😮
ОтветитьI read my kjv on accordance,for the Greek and Hebrew when i want to chase down a word..
ОтветитьIt's great
ОтветитьI'm not a KJV only person. Though I still use it as my primary study bible. Our standing with God should be based on our faith in Jesus Christ not the bible version we subscribed to. I have become concerned with a new movement - The modern translation only movement, which contends that the KJV is flawed. It shouldn't be used anymore. Here is a statement in the RSV preface 1952: The KJV has... been termed "the noblest monument of English prose." Its revisers in 1881 expressed admiration for "its simplicity, its dignity, its power, its happy turns of expression . . . the music of its cadences, and the felicities of its rhythm." It entered, as no other book has, into the making of the personal character and the public institutions of the English-speaking peoples. We owe to it an incalculable debt. YET THE KJV HAS GRAVE DEFECTS < If this isn't double speak I don't know what is. I have read (from the internet) figures of 150, 400 & 450 different English versions of the bible have been produced. If we average those figs. Its 335. Why do we need 335 different translations of the same book? 5, 10, 15 ok, maybe. its an important book. Important books warrant more than 1 translation. But 335? Plain reason and common sense should inform us that theological and economic motives are the primary reasons for this glut of translations. Is God the author of confusion? Its something to think about.
ОтветитьHere's a video with no real research. What about the words that have been changed from kjv to modern bibles. Revelation 1:11. Compare that one between them. You'll be surprised. New bibles remove the diety of Jesus saying all things were made through him, not by him. Even the new king james calls itself the crossover bible to get you ready for a newer corrupted version. Romans 3:25 is another one to compare. You need more research before making a video like this.
ОтветитьI love you brother and I have the upmost respect for you and I watch your videos daily. With that said, myth or not, the amount of men that gave their lives to bring you that hated king James. I also know for a fact that the other bibles take away the deity of christ. I know verses are ommited. I could go on and on. Those that were burned at the stake, beheaded, and brutally massacred for that bible means you give them dishonor by using any other. God is a bloody God. No one died to bring you the other versions. Again, I love you brother and will continue to watch your videos. But I'll stay with king james.
ОтветитьWhy don't you defend the bible you prefer and not go against the KJV that has more power when you read it, otherwies move on and keep stumbling people in your phere and pay for your actions later.
ОтветитьWe need to return back to the Holy Spirit as He will guide us in all truth
ОтветитьI just want Gods word in truth.
ОтветитьThis guy is lost!!! Don't listen to him. The KJV Bible is the exact word of God in English!!! All the other versions are from the Vatican and they all omit scripture at some point. Do your research. Satan knows that the Remnant will feast and devour the Word of God!!! Satan isn't stupid!!! He has to come up a plan for those of us that dedicate ourselves to learning truth and if He can't get us away from the Bible,then,He just creates perversions of the perfect Bible!!! Nasb,Eiv,Nkjv,Etc. Don't be deceived!!! For Example if you look at the NASB Version it says there is now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus.However,it omits the rest of the text. Which says who walk not after the Flesh but after the Spirit!!! Very Important. If you omit that part if the text,then,Christians can think that they can walk in the Flesh and not be condemned!!!
ОтветитьSeems like he doesn’t know what he’s talking about, I read many versions side by side to KJV and they simply convey a different message. Is simple, they aren’t true translation, they are from corrupted manuscripts from Alexanderia
ОтветитьThe ONLY TRANSLATION which is repeatedly attacked by demonic forces. Wonder why???
ОтветитьThat’s false. No one looks down on anyone that uses a different translation. It’s you double tongued Christians who say we don’t have an inerrant translation. That somehow BEING SAVED says the same thing as ARE SAVED. So which one is true? One is lying. The problem is Bible teachers who say modern versions say the same thing. That’s an outright lie. It’s the lying we have a problem with.
ОтветитьAre you suggesting that God preserved his word in the Old Testament in other languages other than Hebrew for Isreal??? So which language did he preserve it in??
ОтветитьWhich English Bible is the perfect word of God? What is your standard for the English Bible? Non-KJV people will not show me the perfect English Bible because they don't have one. They are still searching for it. I have it, it is the King James version, the English Bible for all English speaking people.
ОтветитьThis man is WEAK!!! If the new modem bibles are better than the KJV why are the churches today such a mess. Answer, they have removed GOD's pure word the KJV bible.
ОтветитьA lot of the King James Only nonsense could be done away with if the KJV Onlyists would just believe what the King James translators say about their own translation in their Preface To The Reader. It used to be included in the KJV Bible but has been removed from most modern KJV Bibles. They were under no illusion that they were inspired as the original Biblical authors were and admitted that their translation would have errors (they call them warts) just as every translation before them had.
Ответить"Every-bible-onlyists" don't realize that they are in facts contradicting their foundation and subordinating the scriptures to empiricism and probabilities. When you assume that textual critics rate probabilities for textual variants they are collating texts based on probabilities. The problem is the in order for you to presuppose science and logic and rate probability you need the truth of scripture. They assume the biblical worldview to begin science and rate probabilities, then they turn around and subjugate the bible to their probabilities and science.
ОтветитьThis poor man😢
ОтветитьPeople once believed the bible shouldn't be translated into english at all.
ОтветитьI also have a leaf from an original 1611 KJV. It’s from the “she” edition which was printed between 1611 and 1613. It’s from the book of Acts. It has marginal notes. Not sure why or how anyone can argue that the 1611 didn’t contain marginal notes. It’s basic knowledge to anyone who studies English Bible history. The 1611 KJV Bible contained 8,422 marginal notes from the translators. A lot of the KJV only nonsense would end if people would read the KJV Translators Preface to the Reader. They were certainly under no illusion that they were inspired or that their Bible wouldn’t contain errors (they called them warts). They also believed all of the translations that came before theirs were the Word Of God.
ОтветитьAnyone have a reference to the document he's reading from?
ОтветитьThe new versions taking verses out was the deal breaker for me.
ОтветитьAll the versions are different, which one is correct, it can only be one and that perfect word in English is the kjv. Everyone says
ОтветитьGod did preserved his word--the textus receptus not the codex sinaiticus and vaticanus. Those are counterfeits and all the other translations like the niv, nkjv, et all derived from the sinaiticus and vaticanus. Satan has plenty of his ministers who sound just like you defending his work. But we know better. New believers! be aware. Do your homework and don't be lazy.
ОтветитьI guess everyone is ok with taken whole verses out & changing words to completely change the meaning of verses in the only real bible KJ. You can call me a kj only all u want & guess what it doesn't bother me a bit because I believe in what the word of God says without any shadow of doubt. As long as u don't, u are gonna keep believing the Devil. Yeah, hath God said.
Matthew 4:4, KJV: "But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
What does the rest of the non English speaking world use? KJV is of no use! Do they have 500 year old translations?
Ответитьkjv only
ОтветитьThe other versions might be 95 percent of the kjv but remember rat poison is only 5 percent poison which is enough of the whole to kill you. Kjv is perfect. Modern translations are evil, they remove verses. Compare the kjv to other translations, they are not the same. Each language has their own bibles but English is the language of the world. The problem is that people truly do not believe in a perfect bible and want to correct it, they are from completely different manuscripts. The evidence is that everyone attacks the kjv but never the others. God told us he would preserve His word. Stop changing the truth to fit your calvanist catholic agenda
ОтветитьThey're not really minor differences there's this one where the King James version makes Daniel into a false prophet. I made a video about it it actually has ended a lot of Fellowship I had with people for pointing it out. But they can't counter it they just hate me even though they've never even responded to it. Because you can't respond to it because the grammar makes it so obvious
ОтветитьThe devil HATES the KJV
Ответить