U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument: Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

Just the sight of these morally corrupt people posing as supreme turns my stomach. They represent the worst of American politics today. Shameful creeps.

The Usa is being slowly being killed.

The History of every society that sacrificed their children. Ended in the demise of that society. America is dieing. It has been for a long time.

I can't wait for these judges to tell me what cancer treatments I can take. They are clearly smarter then all the medical doctors.
PS:Arguments from tradition and history are logical fallacies.

To Scott Stewart if you read the constitution there are many more interpretations that uphold Roe vs. Wade in the constitution than your quite frankly ridiculous argument that the constitution does not uphold abortion .. WOMEN DID NOT HAVE ANY RIGHTS WHEN THE Constitution WAS WRITTEN. By that logic women shouldn't be able to vote, exercise rights, own property unless a male figure , father , husband, etc.
I could go on forever

What Republican president has ever appointed a judge because of their dedication and love of America and to protect the constitution?
That will tell right there so how corrupt the Republican Party has always been.
They have always appointed cronies that will do their corrupt agenda.

People Don't Even Know That There Are Only 2 Genders The Left Has Went Off The Deep End! When A Woman Becomes Pregnant It Is Not Only Just Her Life Anymore That Fetus Has A Right To Life Also! Murder Is Murder! When You Abort A Fetus You Have Taken A Life!

God save the USA FROM this dishonerable court

Thomas keeps asking the same question 3 times, & 3 times dismisses the plaintiffs answer. Him and Alito are morons with only one agenda, to keep the 99% in poverty through any breaking of laws possible.

Robert and his 5 Moscothire the one who only go for free stuff

Abortion is an ethical issue not a legal one. It has no place in the courts.

There are No Grandparents.

abortion should be OK for blacks.

If it please The Court, I also asked whether I could be protected from harassment because I said I am not LGBTQIA, and have no plans of ever trying to have more children. Despite the fact that I am 54, I have been completely abstinent for well over seven years here in Philadelphia PA, and don't plan on getting remarried or dating any time in the foreseeable future. I also don't want to be a "Political Plaything".

The court guarantees freedom from religion, why are these religious ideas being forced on everyone.

Scalia’s dissent is extraordinary, none in the constitution gives the right to abortion, its semantic and playful association of the texts to use privacy and due process clauses to reason why such claim to the right is constitutional. This issue is generational, political in a sense, (eg: there are more who believe that abortion is wrong now than before), its a belief which in turn divides the people, its known in the constitution that the political branch of the government is the congress, and not a judicial intervention, any further cases in an attempt to overturn this Dobbs decision would worry “the people” that the 3rd branch of the government is turning political and that the judicial branch to begin uses constitutional loopholes for their activism. Congress and states, by the power of people should decide if this claim is a liberty, that the force of popularism should be addresses by statutes, and the power of the people to repel and that the power of democracy, through majority to reign in the heart of each state.

@ 12min, Sonya Sotamayor is talking not Elana Kagan. Come on guys.

This is neither a solicitation nor an invitation, this Is the truth. I am and have been completely abstinent for almost eight years (excluding a few days in 2016) here in Philadelphia PA USA and about seven years overall (with the exception of one day in early 2018). My eldest son (who is diagnosed with a disability, but who I am teaching) is still a virgin (to my absolute very, very, very, very, very,very, very, very, very, best knowledge), and my youngest son is married and expecting a baby girl with his pregnant wife. 05-23-2023 (while I was running for Congress)-01-06-2024, nor do we have STI's or STD's, no Cancer, no COVID-19, not LGBTQIA and do not have sex, nor have been sexually active in years, and no longer have a menstrual cycle. I was a virgin when I went to college, and was at home praying on September 11th as well as election days (normally). I have not been paid by my job in 36 weeks.Of course, I am not, nor have been pregnant in many years, still not LGBTQIA, nor do I do drugs, do not have sex Not having affairs or micro cheating, which I only heard of a few minutes ago in the New York Post

The Constitution does not mention Live Dismemberment Abortion and was intentionally silent on it (they knew about abortion when writing it, debated the issue and like countries everywhere, decided that it was too repulsive to be included). It was a group of ugly far-left extremists that explicitly wanted to genocide African Americans (ugly racists Ms. Singer the founder for abortion clinics) through Live Dismemberment Abortion, that pumped this idea. Today the majority of blacks are Dismembered live by Aborted. This ugly leftist decision is repealed finally. If people want Live Dismemberment Abortion then they can vote for it like any other so-called "right" and it will become law inless the guarantee of life contained in the Consition precludes this barbaric practice (as most think it would). Of course, the majoirty, including women, will vote against it. About time. This country had Live Dismemberment Abortions of more than 25 percent of all babies. Disgusting act coming to an end.

Did you ever notice that those opposed to abortion are usually the first ones screaming for the death penalty.

It's modern world and freedom of Individual is well protected and right to life is included in article 14and 21of the Constitution of India that's equality between the individuals and right to life is an inherent right live but it came from the philosophy of life, because prior to the Constitution there was only master and servant relationship but from the biblical point of view abortion is crucifixion of the unborn child is matter inviting rigiours penalty but in modern society it's question of choice to avoid unwanted pregnancy even one Jagannath panikar has written a book encouraging population explosion with title "crucifixion of the unborn but now there's ample decision supporting abortions bit it's morally wrong to kill a baby that's my, Iam lawyer with forty two years of experience in High court that's all any way it was good education for all to listen eminent men of law thanks to u tube education best wishes🎉

That Julie is such a misserable hag. Thank God she lost. She is so off puting. Full of lies, and anti-American bigot.

Julie Rikelman is outstanding here. Glad she’s on the bench now.

Freaks

Amen To Life is a gift from the Lord and No one has the right to Take it away period . So you people are fighting against God And bringing this Curse and judgment to Continue as The Transexual Sins in this country and world. And this is God’s body he Owns it and has the ultimate power to those. Under the Constitutional belief of “—That We are endowed by Our Creator with Certain rights given by him , the Lord -; Life is listed first here and liberty And pursuit of happiness “ is mentioned here also. ..Oh please hear Psalm 139: 14 , and on. And let me Say life is in the, blood it says in the Old testament . So that’s from Conception as to is Said in bible so Life is ordained By God if You believe That or Not”. And I am Free to call This religion Or how About relationship With God We are Speaking Of.! But if I can Share to those who believe in the Only True God and Jesus Christ his Father has given For Jesus in this passage ; was praying to his Father and for his followers Then and even Now !…—( was talking about John 17 ,in the New,Testament )”……….❤

How awesome is this in 2024? Especially when you can only listen 🎶 without watching the video of the justices and lawyers. Thank you, C-Span.

Listen I believe that here in the united states of America a women has the right to do with her body as she pleases as does she have the right to sleep with a man or a women same for men we can do what we want to our own bodies that is basic autonomy and human rights I can’t say it any other way but the biggest deal here is that this republican majority on the court has handed democrats every single election since this decision has come down and if they wish to put the cherry on top and ensure an electoral landslide for Biden this year they will ban the pill !!! Again Trump continues to be the worse thing to happen to the gop in a generation and I hope they never recover !!!! God bless America and god bless President Joe Biden !!!!!!!

Thank you

They codified their catholic beliefs into common law, in violation of the first amendment. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." These catholic justices were all raised in catholic homes and catholic schools and feel uncomfortable in the company of people who don't believe what they do. Non catholic speech still feels foreign to them. I have read the gov't stand on when life begins and they take no stand on the matter. They said it could be different depending on the science or philosophy. They made law respecting established their religion. The STENCH will never go away.

He said IT'S NOT TIED TO A RELIGIOUS VIEW? BUT IT IS! Other religions do not believe life begins at conception and the law says life begins after birth, we are not citizens till we are borne. It does run into religious exercise law, and should be voided.

Thomas question should be answered COCAINE IS ILLEGAL and she should go before the law for that!!

Good morning 1950akkaanna

If women can kill it or keep it men shouldnt be forced to pay if they dont want it

The Arizona Legislature did not repeal A.R.S. § 13-3603 when it enacted SB 1164. Instead, SB 1164, which was passed in 2022, imposes a gestational limit on abortions, prohibiting most abortions after 15 weeks of gestation except in cases of medical emergency12. This law does not create a right to an abortion, nor does it make any unlawful abortion legal23. Additionally, SB 1164 explicitly states that it does not repeal A.R.S. § 13-36031.

Reliance interest can have multiple meanings, including in contract law, constitutional law, and interpretation:
Contract law
A reliance interest is the stake of a party in a contract that has been violated. It protects the promisee's interest by requiring the promisor to put the promisee in a position as good as they would have been in if the contract had not been made. This can include seeking compensation, recouping losses, or recovering expenses. For example, if a promisee makes investments in preparation for a contract's performance, reliance damages can compensate them for those expenditures. However, the reliance must be reasonable.
Constitutional law
Reliance interests are private, societal, and public interests that affect the application of interpretive doctrine. They can anchor constitutional bias in favor of interpretive continuity and provide guardrails for theories of interpretation. Reliance interests can also contemplate capital investments made by private parties in reliance on legal regimes, and preserving them can promote stability in the law.
Interpretation
Reliance interests can also provide an orderly process for updating old norms. For example, courts are less likely to defer to presidential judgments in foreign affairs if they believe policy swings are motivated by partisan considerations.

No

Interesting

Did the u.s. constitution place trust in the people .... Or did the people - all the people place trust in .... ? ...? ... ? Thomas Jefferson & John Adams ...?

The only Justice who is opining heavily is Sotomayor. Every other justice is neutrally analyzing the case. She's veiling her political views by producing statistics to bolster the pro abortion stance.

sotomayor and libs justices fighting to legalize an action without accountability

Do kagan and sotomayor have kids?

To repeat takes no Brain. Satanic , seeing things as they present. Marked by extreme cruelty and viciousness. The Battle is the Lord’s.

Sotomayor lacks thorough Line of logic in her comment. If a brain dead person responds to pain it does not make them dead. Being actually dead and brain dead are two different things.

Sotomayor lacks thorough Line of logic in her comment. If a brain dead person responds to pain it does not make them dead. Being actually dead and brain dead are two different things.

There is a fundamental flaw in rickelmans argument. She should’ve known the author who wrote the article roe v wade relied upon. Stating a source without direction, is crazy. It just goes to show the right to murder/abortion is evil.

Why does she sound so condescending and pissed off