Top 5 Diamond Aircraft Comparison 2022-2023 | Price & Specs

Top 5 Diamond Aircraft Comparison 2022-2023 | Price & Specs

Aviation Federation

2 года назад

233,290 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@richardgripe5888
@richardgripe5888 - 28.05.2022 23:37

Looking for 300hp. per side and 200kt cruise, maybe pressurized

Ответить
@BlackPantherStudios
@BlackPantherStudios - 29.05.2022 03:44

South Africa aviation would be a wonderful sight to see. Great video

Ответить
@cpe1704tks.
@cpe1704tks. - 30.05.2022 07:13

Question. What is the significance of naming it a "62?" What is the hidden connection?

Ответить
@nasosnasos8054
@nasosnasos8054 - 02.06.2022 16:52

Love love

Ответить
@nasosnasos8054
@nasosnasos8054 - 02.06.2022 16:53

Price ?

Ответить
@matthewbrinker6615
@matthewbrinker6615 - 05.06.2022 23:25

My comment is for all of them. Too damn expensive and China holdings. Never going to get one now even if I ever get the money for one.
I get afford aviation anymore.

Ответить
@albertvonschultz9137
@albertvonschultz9137 - 12.06.2022 17:13

I have been thinking about buying the da40 and also the da62

Ответить
@debbies3763
@debbies3763 - 13.06.2022 16:42

BEAUTYFUL AND THE RANGE IS GREAT 4 PASSANGER BUT A BIT UNDERPOWERED , LANCEAIR OR GLASAIR ARE FLYING AT 300MPH EVEN AN OLD MOONEY FLYS OVER 200MPH TRIPS IN THESE SMALL FIBERGLASS ROCKETS SHOULD QUICK.

Ответить
@easternwoods4378
@easternwoods4378 - 19.06.2022 06:43

Too bad Diamond was sold to the Chinese.

Ответить
@totosukatendel9209
@totosukatendel9209 - 25.06.2022 04:37

Good idea if the figures mentioned , displayed in the screen.

Ответить
@satguy
@satguy - 26.06.2022 12:50

I was a fan until I found out it was Chinese owned.

Ответить
@huto9606
@huto9606 - 26.06.2022 21:13

Für mich das beste Flugzeug in dieser Klasse. Das Unternehmen ist langsam von Jahr zu Jahr gewachsten. Alle gewonnen Erkenntnisse wurden in der nächsten Generation von Flugzeugen berücksichtigt. Nur so ist ein Erfolg und eine Weiterentwicklung möglich. Das stetig wachsende bring dich zu einer guten Ernte.

Ответить
@foramericam1097
@foramericam1097 - 29.06.2022 06:33

Pretty planes but not worth the price!! The ASTRO is crap underpowered overpriced! The 62 is well over a million and there is other planes that have better performance for less!!

Ответить
@md.moinulislam9467
@md.moinulislam9467 - 30.06.2022 01:28

Cool video.....

Ответить
@goldenaye3
@goldenaye3 - 02.07.2022 22:24

They don't have toilets

Ответить
@degraham9198
@degraham9198 - 04.07.2022 00:52

Reckon you could fly that on one engine if
you had to? I guess it
would vary with payload. No cheesecake for Deanna, boo hiss.

Ответить
@emilioalvarez9059
@emilioalvarez9059 - 04.07.2022 17:20

me encanta

Ответить
@ezequielrussian392
@ezequielrussian392 - 06.07.2022 15:55

Rating all models of diamond : I have worked on da 40 all the way to 62 and I got to say innovation wise they are there new technology they are there but in my opinion they are aircraft that are too expensive for what they offer .
First no one bigger than 5'7 can sit comfortably in any model .
Second , as far as durability and maintenance these planes have to be extensively inspected where no diamond service center has a good maintenance team that practices good maintenance that is why I left and I choose not to work these airframes.
Third, still in maintenance the manuals are free but alot of the times are missing alot of information and you have to call diamond support. Also parts can't be stocked perhaps and or as an example as a shop to stock parts that usually break you have to order on a need basis I don't know if this has changed I hope so .
Fourthly , based on these points I consider diamond aircraft too expensive with parts , planes as what they offer you can easily buy a twin turbo prop with that type price tag with a sacrifice of burning more fuel and being more comfortable .

Ответить
@billyhillk5726
@billyhillk5726 - 09.07.2022 14:22

Made for short folks. Not being prejudiced here. They're just not practical for anyone over about 5'6/7".

Ответить
@jhaymanmyles2226
@jhaymanmyles2226 - 09.07.2022 23:55

Soon as I heard owned by a chinese holding group at the beginning of the video i stopped watching

Ответить
@stanislawfaron7810
@stanislawfaron7810 - 10.07.2022 23:17

👍

Ответить
@Karim-en9on
@Karim-en9on - 11.07.2022 17:15

Ok nice

Ответить
@ivanramiroalmaralesvargas5265
@ivanramiroalmaralesvargas5265 - 25.07.2022 06:18

Very nice informations thank you!!!

Ответить
@redstone5149
@redstone5149 - 30.07.2022 08:44

Chinese crap

Ответить
@josh885
@josh885 - 03.08.2022 04:13

Diamond really needs a model above the DA62 with the DA50RG engines so it can hit at least 200kts and ideally a pressurized cabin.

Ответить
@drampadreg1386
@drampadreg1386 - 09.08.2022 05:28

24 gallons of fuel for a plane doing 150 knots or so these days is not fuel efficient, 13 is. I've seen on 10 GPH@ 184 Kts as well, it was a Lancair.

Ответить
@chutorosushi1925
@chutorosushi1925 - 14.09.2022 12:23

Beautiful diamond aircraft and design.hope the prices and come down abit to let more people able to own this plane

Ответить
- 23.09.2022 22:47

Estes aviões da Diamond me fascinam! Já ouvi pilotos experientes dizerem, que os bimotores desta marca são superlativamente eficientes, econômicos e seguros. Só me falta a grana pra adquirir um destes! Um da linha dos monomotores já seria um luxo sem tamanho pra mim. Sonhar não paga imposto né! ☺️

Ответить
@Robert-mn8gc
@Robert-mn8gc - 10.10.2022 00:35

Love the 🇦🇹 Austrian's . I lived there in in 1979 in Braunau am inn .
Gr8 people. 👍 wouldn't purchase a Diamond Aircraft now l know its owned by Chinese on principle. Stuff there Government. Pack of Bastards, full of Corruption .

Ответить
@OMA254
@OMA254 - 14.12.2022 19:38

Lots of inaccuracies! In the pictures and the facts.

Ответить
@amgguy4319
@amgguy4319 - 11.01.2023 01:36

Gosh, the Austrians knew how to design. But it's now Chinese, and we should all do our best to avoid Chinese...

Ответить
@abhiyudaysrivastav3683
@abhiyudaysrivastav3683 - 11.01.2023 07:12

Very well done

Ответить
@heaye
@heaye - 11.01.2023 12:43

Which have pressured cabin ?

Ответить
@gurbinderkaur6548
@gurbinderkaur6548 - 09.03.2023 14:11

👍🏻

Ответить
@n.elliott9122
@n.elliott9122 - 06.04.2023 21:40

Please do not buy this airplane or the cirrus they are both owned by China please stop supporting China.

Ответить
@HappymanRH
@HappymanRH - 20.04.2023 15:58

😊

Ответить
@hungrysurfer9471
@hungrysurfer9471 - 24.04.2023 12:53

DA62 can have longer range tanks fitted.

Ответить
@ShinLeeChan
@ShinLeeChan - 01.05.2023 23:42

Loved these aircrafts till Chinese became the owner!
They still need more power 'cause engines are underpower but safe.

Ответить
@robertmacombo8767
@robertmacombo8767 - 10.05.2023 18:08

What a great shame, from austrian to chinese.

Ответить
@tdgdbs1
@tdgdbs1 - 11.05.2023 03:33

Fuel burn and fuel capacity are two different metrics.

Ответить
@ditto1958
@ditto1958 - 21.06.2023 05:37

Composite = plastic?

Ответить
@gdotone1
@gdotone1 - 20.07.2023 04:48

it looks cramped. man! it is a great looking plane but it could be bigger.

Ответить
@julieredmon1521
@julieredmon1521 - 04.09.2023 02:39

How does anyone afford a million dollar plane? The payments would be more than my harley and house payments combined. Would love to have one but too rich for my blood.

Ответить
@FelixSamulevich
@FelixSamulevich - 01.10.2023 20:48

One word is not mentioned if it have right for PARACHUTE implanted Last one if not to notice so taile have to be longer

Ответить
@thesecret7330
@thesecret7330 - 14.10.2023 06:13

Chinese😢😮😮😮no please don't say that 😢😢😢😢

Ответить
@СулиманАбдулхаджиев-ш4к
@СулиманАбдулхаджиев-ш4к - 01.11.2023 20:57

👍👍👍

Ответить
@themrjim1953
@themrjim1953 - 19.03.2024 23:41

where are the prices ????

Ответить
@manuelpavoarce
@manuelpavoarce - 22.06.2024 12:50

Me encanta , que aviones tan buenos, como me gustaría aprender con practica a pilotar uno de esos fantásticos aviones. El problema es económico. Además tendria que aprender empezando por lo mas fácil . como un párvulo. No la gramática. empezando con un simulador de vuelo. claro. ingles partiendo de cero. No empezando por la Gramática

Ответить