THE Heresy CRUSHING the Catholic Church today with Kennedy Hall

Homosexuality-thinking is the core of Modernist-thinking, and both are the direct expression of Satanic-brain (as said by exorcist Father Stephen Rosetti) or Satanic-thinking. Only in Satanic-thinking can the accelerated destruction of the Church, with confusion, compromise, closing of churches and horrific scandals be called a "springtime of the Church."

It's the most demonic corruption of real language and of real thinking, and we must fight together with Jesus, Mary and Joseph for those two most basic essential pillars of our Faith and without which it crumbles as it is happening now.

In insane language and insane thinking there's no True Faith possible. Faith is based on Divine Order and Absolute Truth, not sinful-criminal-insanity-thinking disguised as love. With Jesus we must fight, fight, fight!! Jesus reigns!!!

“Smoke of Satan”, put out by TAN books is also a good book on this subject

What does this mean then for the legacy of Ratzinger and Woyilta??
They were there and very present at the debacle of Vatican 2?

The ambiguity was abhorrent

What does this mean then for the legacy of Ratzinger and Woyilta??
They were there and very present at the debacle of Vatican 2?

The ambiguity was abhorrent

Teilhard de Chardin! 🕳️

The only true faith is the one biblical faith. We dont need failed manmade fallible religion.

A few have postulated that the French Revolution infiltrated into the Catholic Church. St Pius X really tried to stop modernism. He failed. The church went down
hill to what Ab Fulton Sheen called the ape of the church.Judas is everywhere. Sadly😢💦

For months I've been working on a project that takes Pascendi, paragraph by paragraph, side by side actions and words of Francis illustrating each paragraph. The completed total will demonstrate how Francis is of the Modernist heresy.
(I'm in the Houston area.) @JoeKennedy

Most people don't know that Paul VI never had a seminary education.
No seminary at all --- he had a private formation.

Your conversations are growing tired. The only discussions I hear on your channel are Vatican II bad…Western Bishops ill-informed…Novus Ordo illicit…pre-conciliar period best…TLM the only valid Liturgy. I’ve listened to a number of your podcasts and I can’t recall too much conversation focused on prayer and the sacraments. I would agree that some liturgical reforms are necessary to make the Novus Ordo more reverent, but both Novus Ordo and TLM can co-exist to bring the faithful closer to the Sacred Heart of Jesus.

Yes, it’s nice definitely to see Kennedy Hall. I’m a follow Canadian and it’s good that he’s on greet programs like yours. God bless Joe McClane

Thanks for reminding me why I became a Protestant, I’ll be celebrating two years as such this summer. Raising my 3 kids as Protestants as well.

It is really arrogant and shows a sheer lack of substance & intellectual dishonesty to dismiss Pope Benedict XVI & Pope John Paul II. I appreciate the deserved criticism of "Pope" (at this point in history) Francis but Kennedy uses straw man-indoctrinated labels (again without substantive content) to push an SSPX self-promotion agenda that preys on people who are not well-versed in Catholic teaching.

Nice job. The more I learn about my Catholic faith, the more I love it. God bless you.

The problem is not so much V2, as it is all the unchecked abuses after it.

Excellent

Fascinating. THANK YOU. Blessed be God forever ❤

I lived through the changes post Vatican 2 with the introduction of The NO Liturgy. As child heading for my teens something felt terribly wrong, and, everything I had been cathechised in by the Church to that point, seemed to be challenged with a different interpretation. If you like in a modern light rather than the clarity that has been taught by pre-Vatican 2 reforms.

So modern interpretations of Doctrine overrode the clarity of Pre Councillior Doctrine, obscured clarity and left The faithful to discern with their own conscience rather than Church teaching. 🙏

Joe, Kennedy thanks for your work. However it wasn't what I am searching. I don't know if we use the same definition of Heresy. My understanding: Heresy is a violation of the Church's unity, worse than Schism, less bad than Apostasy. All Heretics I have ever heard of were wrongly convinced to be servants of Truth. But they didn't seek Unity. Putting their private ideas over their desire to stay in Unity they wouldn't accept correction.
I like the priorities of Pope Francis. The question " Who is my neighbor?" asks who belongs to the community of the faithful. Jesus chooses a Samaritan for his example, a man rather an Apostate than a Heretic. Francis thinks we have a tendency to neglect Jesus' advice. We can't reduce the Pope's office to doctrine. Perfect doctrine won't save me, if I don't act according to God's will. In the Gospel Jesus numerous times demands us to be attentive.
One who reduces the Pope's office to doctrine will expect the purpose of Synodality to clarify doctrine which - I agree - won't work. But if Synodality is not about doctrine, but about giving attention for my Neighbor? If the Hierarchy neglected to be attentive for common people, because to become a Bishop doctrine was the only qualification needed? I think then Synodality is useful.
I don't think St. Thomas Aquinus would share your point of view on modern philosophy. He worked to integrate the previously less known Aristotelian philosophy with Catholic Theology. Aristoteles, who's work they received via Muslim scholars. You really think he would have avoided Kant?
There is one problem you seem to underestimate: God remains the same, but the times change. The change of times brings forth other questions and other problems. The depositum fidei remains unchanged, but every generation needs to receive what is needed in their time. Are you aware how much competence we have lost since the times of Thomas Aquinus? He wrote the Summa Theologiae as an introduction for beginners in theology. Even at the time of Pius X, who as you said was in many ways more competent compared to theologians of our time, it was no longer a summary of theology but the summit of theology. The base camp where theology started at Thomas' times was the peak one could reach at the times of Pius X, and nowadays we are even less capable. But still we have to testify the Faith although with a much reduced intellectual toolkit.
Pope Francis hopes that in listening to one another the Spirit will guide us to testify the original Faith with tools matched to our actual competence.
I guess we are unable to fall into some of the old Heresies, because we are no longer capable to intellectually understand them. That makes the diagnosis of those Heresies quite difficult.
I guess the error of Pius X and John Paul II was the opinion the Church could prevent Modernism. The Church no longer had the leverage to control society. I think it is our duty to learn how to preach the Faith in a society built on Modernism with the leverage we actually have. For that we have to understand our contemporaries, to talk, and to unearth the true desires of the human heart which are only satisfied in Jesus Christ.

So funny to see catholics hating catholics and catholics hating protestants and protestants hating catholics. It's so funny! See how these Christians hate one another!

We have to ask ourselves why we disregard the two thousand years of the Church and believe that Vatican 2 was the end of all?

Question is: WHO JUST WHO is behind all these heresies. Certainy francis is not alone.

Just bought your book...Thank you for caring - Te Deum

"Again it is necessary to recall and censure a most grave error in which some Catholics miserably dwell, who suppose that men living in error and aliens from the True Faith and Catholic unity are able to attain eternal life; which indeed is particularly opposed to Catholic doctrine. - Pope Pius IX, "Quanto Conficiamur", August 10, 1863

"Finally, some of these misguided people attempt to persuade themselves and others that men are not saved only in the Catholic religion, but that even heretics can attain eternal life." - Pope Gegory XVI, "Summo Iugiter Studio" (no. 2), May 27, 1832

"Whoever says that baptism is optional - that is, NOT NECESSARY for salvation: Let him be anathema." - Council of Trent, Session 7 Canon 5 on the Sacrament of Baptism.

The heresy’s started with the great schism and haven’t stopped.

After St. Pius X cofficialy condemned Modernism, a Priest wrote the small cathecism on Modernism. St. Pius X called for this Catechism to be widely spread. Everything this Catechism that the Pope condemned is exactly what is being practiced in the Church today. Catholics must be told the truth aboout Modernism, it would bring an outcry from all Catholics.

When St. John XXlll spoke of the opening of the windows, he was talking about his great Council that was voted out through a plot. That is why the we refer to the hi-jacked Council.

Sure, I've read Pascendi.

Thank you Father Jesus Christ for giving us your one true Catholic church 2000yrs ago

Yes! It is Modernism. More specifically, it is the idea that Catholic and Christian are not interchangeable words with the exact same meaning. Pope Pius XII taught as doctrine that the Holy Catholic Church and the Mystical Body of Christ are one and the same thing. The Church is imploding because she can no longer correctly define Herself.

Galveston/Houston Dioceses is requiring priest to sign a document that states the priest will agree with the LBG…, agenda. Can you let me know if this is true?

Another book : Deep Church Revealed.

“Don’t have to be inside the Catholic Church to be saved”… Mother Teresa too. I remember reading through a black and white photo book we had of her and scratching my head how she said some very concerning things like helping Hindus be good Hindus (so on and so forth). Now I know she was flawed and am irked how modern ppl are canonized in record time.

What is distressing is that, for a typical lay Catholic who goes to mass, reads their Bible observes and participates in the sacraments, it sounds like it is easy to be mislead by consciously heritical clergy who know full well that their congregations have not been well catechised. Two quick examples. I was at a men's retreat and the retreat director said, in one of the conferences, that he thought the mass was not the most important thing the Church does. What???? I was going to stand up to challenge it, but was waiting for a possible clarification, which never came. After the retreat I followed up with the organization and told them what happened and that this is a serious problem and not what we need at a retreat house where we expect and need the very best, most solid and faithful clergy possible (he was moved that year). But was this priest COUNTING on poorly educated catholic men? A second example was in a parish where the Paster would regularly let one of the Deacons give the homily at Sunday mass. On one occassion this deacon opined that there is a NEW understanding of the three servants who were left the various number of "talents" and upon returning two provided gains and one just buried his and gave them back. Well, this Deacon said the NEW understanding was that this last servant demonstrated a lack of greed and actually did the right thing. What??? Again, it feels like this Deacon was counting on a poorly educated congregation.

Dude over 10k adult baptisms in france coming eastern vigil, growing numbers in england
What are you talking about? All of this has nothing to do with you & is diocesan.

Much true here, but The Credo of the People of God (1968) of Pope St. Paul VI is Christian, Catholic, clear, decisive and true. Considering all else in the Credo's light is the way to go. The Credo is the current embodiment of lodestar. Deo gratias.

And, if anyone has a problem with "People of God," well, they've got a problem.

Harold Stanford
Bear Valley Springs, California USA

DeChardin was trying to square Catholicism with evolution. The problem is, two things that evolution teach do not square at all with Cathocism: 1) that the universe either created itself OR always existed and 2) that human beings evolved consciousness - that is became moral, conscious beings without divine intervention. Both of these theories conflict with Catholicism and should be rejected on religious AND scientific grounds. 1) The universe COULD NOT create itself and 1) did not always exist - see the Big Bang . Yes, there are other theories, but they all conflict and there's no proof or consensus. 2) science can't even define what consciousness is, yet the scientists all seem to know where it came from - hardly. Scientism assumes no God and then tries to prove it - nice try science. Go back to your corner.

"I am created, therefore I am"...there, that's better.

When will this book be audible???? Please please!

Most succinct definition I have ever heard of modernism.

Black and White and gray, interesting. Maybe there is no gray, we know what is right and right is Truth, thus White or Light, thus unity, then black is wrong and there is no argument about a gray area.

Anyone who supports or is involved in actual mortal sin cannot be called a Christian, mortal sin shuts us off from God. Take a look at Hollywood all those remarriages by the famous, an example of mortal sin. Even the most beloved who are in their first, second etc divorce they are in Mortal Sin, they are not being Christians of any kind. Mortal Sin is Death, a lot of us don't see to get that. I am sorry when a marriage breaks up, the reality is a hard one. Life on Earth is a hard one. Making excuses makes matters worse.

The church seems so “Protestant “ now.

so, put the Bible back in the library- - turn it upside down; it is closed book. The Fathers of the Church Aquinas read and studied are pushed aside. After I have proven a Masters in theology literacy, Memorize Aquinas and Aristotle I'll be saved. Seems Roman Catholic of the Latin West has rewritten the Church Christ established. No wonder we RC are seeking spiritualist who are dependent upon Marian Seers and those who profess a personal revelation by Jesus. In 20 years RC will be a New Age Church, a glorified protestant expression. We can write books but we cant discern our daily bread from God..

pray for me i have the sickness of the modern church and her priest. The Bible is a second rate account of conversion of mind, body and soul.

Jesus and His Apostles were Jews. They taught the gospel of the Kingdom of God using quotes and concepts from the Tanakh which is similar to what the ancient Roman Church labeled as the OT. Jesus and Moses taught the same doctrine, but waves of successors to the Apostles replaced the divinely inspired with manmade ideology. What you desire is no different than what you criticize.

Can you please have your bppk translate it into spanish, I will like the priests in latinamerica could read this book?

Great interview. Good information to think about.