Комментарии:
The Honda is essentially a small Biz Jet, the Cirrus is a flying family sedan, so it depends on what your purpose is, I'd initially go for the Honda as my company would have no need for a flying sedan.
ОтветитьYes. Cirrus ought to continue with internal combustion power trains.
ОтветитьSirius doesn't make a turboprop....
ОтветитьHonda is going to come up with a Type R version of the HondaJet soon!
ОтветитьHonda, too expensive, too heavy, too complicated, too maintenance heavy. Cirrus, half of all the points raised on the Honda. The choice is clear.
ОтветитьOverall judgement, my accentuation goes to Cirrus vision jet SF-50.
ОтветитьI can’t take the Cirrus seriously.
ОтветитьHaha, 420
ОтветитьThanks
ОтветитьNo comparison! Honda is better. Vision jet slooooow.
ОтветитьHonda Jet all the way.
Ответить直接比べるにはタイプが違うんじゃないか?😅
ОтветитьHondajet is an easy choice. Two engines, a lav, less noisy and more payload
ОтветитьHONDA JET!!!!
ОтветитьCirrus is a much better machine,,, Caps the parachute system (only Cirrus does that or has that) then there is Safe Return, if a pilot is incapasitated,,, with the push of a button the plane can locate nearest airport, call out the situation, navigate terrain and weather, and land with only the passenger pushing 1 button... (now the only thing honda has is a potty? and costs twice as much, consumes way more fuel and can fly 10k higher? seems not even a competition? if I had kids I know I would feel better if they were in a Cirrus, and being able to land at smaller runways often means less hold times,, and better service?
Ответитьyeah...I'll take the one with the potentially life saving parachute thanks.
ОтветитьTwice the price, the Honda should be twice as good, yes?
Ответить😊🎉
Ответитьthis the most awesome private jet. I really ❤ this small jet.
ОтветитьIn a circus u really have to hold that pee
ОтветитьCirrus had better range. I love it more.
ОтветитьHonda lost on economics
ОтветитьHonda 💯! 🚽🎉 Is plus! And probably Worth every 💵!
ОтветитьThese are two different class of Jet. Cirrus SF50 could be considered "ultra light" jet.
Ответитьระยะทางธุรกิจในอาเซียนไม่ไกลมากตลาดที่นี่ไม่เหมือนอเมริกาเครื่องลำใหญ่ขายได้น้อย
Ответитьจะไปจีนไปอินเดียไปญี่ปุ่นออสเตรเลียมันพอสำหรับการเดินทาง
ОтветитьI like both,Im flyin a drone now.
ОтветитьSorry, the bathroom sold me.
Honda it is.
Need etops cert?
ОтветитьAnd here's me today thinking about buying a new electric scooter and whether I have enough money till the end of the month.
ОтветитьI'm betting in a worst case scenario if one of these jets were to lose a vertical stabiliser, the Cirrus Vision SF50 would have a better chance of landing safely.
ОтветитьMentioning the safety aspects would've been nice as well. I believe the Vision jet edges them on that as well.
ОтветитьThe vision won in my opinion 😊
ОтветитьWell I would say the Vision is the better option but I would've liked the price to run each of these jets per hour of fuel.
ОтветитьAggiungete una toilet al Cirrus e corro in banca ad aprire un mutuo 😂
ОтветитьWow
Cirus with a single engine has a longer range
Which is best smaller plane to fly across Atlantic from NY to London
ОтветитьCirrus is a poor man’s private jet with a cruise missile engine. The V tail reminds me of a Bonanza
ОтветитьYou meet the nicest people flying a Honda.
ОтветитьThey were remiss in not mentioning the CAPS system included in the Cirrus which features a ballistic deployed parachute as well as the autonomous emergency safe return feature.
ОтветитьRRT = Redundancy of engines, Range and Toilet in the cabin.😂
ОтветитьIm going with the safety...period!
ОтветитьHonda for us due to the facilities onboard and the space. But I love love love the Cirrus for short trips
ОтветитьLost credibility for me when claimed the hondajet had further range. But then showed different on the screen. That and wrong images/ videos at parts.. Check your scripts..
Ответить