Tensions between Philippine President Marcos Jr., VP Sara Duterte following assassination remarks

Tensions between Philippine President Marcos Jr., VP Sara Duterte following assassination remarks

ShanghaiEye魔都眼

1 день назад

5,978 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@mxl4345
@mxl4345 - 26.11.2024 20:04

A foolish president that brings more harm than good to his country.

Ответить
@gutsglory3625
@gutsglory3625 - 26.11.2024 20:18

All of the crook politicians are now siding with Marcos to oust the Dutertes. The aftermath is this is Philippines would be in massive debt.

Ответить
@peanut0brain
@peanut0brain - 26.11.2024 20:39

Failipines. Land for sex-pats 😂

Ответить
@DorJinTan
@DorJinTan - 26.11.2024 20:40

Long live d Dutertes!

Ответить
@wsmithe2209
@wsmithe2209 - 26.11.2024 20:53

BBM wants to get back that frozen $40million in US bank. Good life with that money after retirement in US.

Ответить
@harem_lord-FFM
@harem_lord-FFM - 26.11.2024 22:20

No one likes Marcos, he's incompetent, corrupt, a traitor to his voters and an American puppet. The Bisaya people (Duterte's ethnic group) of Central Visayas and most of Mindanao are better off as a separate country from the Philippines. The Philippines has no direction, under Imperial Manila leaders. Staying with the Philippine Republic has no economic and cultural benefit for the Bisaya. Manila has always kowtowed to the Western invaders, they have always been incompetent, they have always been anti Bisaya.

Ответить
@fyoutubesoa
@fyoutubesoa - 26.11.2024 22:26

He will use this excuse to put his VP to jail.

Ответить
@FreedomofSpeech125
@FreedomofSpeech125 - 26.11.2024 22:40

Republic of Panda is very happy now

Ответить
@ConscienceTruth
@ConscienceTruth - 26.11.2024 23:40

Like father like son, corrupted to the core. A spawn of Satan sacrifice the country to its colonial master for money stolen by late father forfeited by his Yankee masters.

Ответить
@brianhong301
@brianhong301 - 26.11.2024 23:47

SON OF AN EX. PH TRAITOR DICTATOR & CRIMINAL WHO STOLE FROM THE PEOPLE, PROPPED UP & ... WHOSE DIRTY LAUNDRY FILE & ILLICIT WEALTH IS WITH AUNTY SAM ... SO ALL OF SUCH EXPECTED ... WERE U EXPECTING SOMETHING DIFFERENT FILIPINOS ??

Ответить
@tomtom9792
@tomtom9792 - 27.11.2024 00:31

I stand with Philipines and West Philipines Sea!!!!! 🇵🇭

Ответить
@Whatisnottaken
@Whatisnottaken - 27.11.2024 00:47

Like his father before him, Marcos Junior is a hypocrite and crook. When his family fled to Hawaii in 1986 with billions in cash, jewellery and valuable artworks, it was in a military cargo plane provided by the U.S. According to source documents provided by the Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG), the Marcos family stole US$5 billion–$10 billion from the Central Bank of the Philippines. Then there was also the assassination of Ninoy Aquino, that was conveniently blamed on communist agents. So it is no surprise that death threats were made against the VP.

Ответить
@weeehooo
@weeehooo - 27.11.2024 01:06

Just wait for the next election and don't resort to violence and that would be the best option for the people in the Philippines. Marcos is going to lose the election anyway.

Ответить
@steventan2267
@steventan2267 - 27.11.2024 01:30

You forgot that your late father assassinated Ninoy .

Ответить
@espaceladon
@espaceladon - 27.11.2024 01:40

Another US zombie dog.

Ответить
@etow8034
@etow8034 - 27.11.2024 02:24

When corrupt politicians are all looking out for themselves the Filipino people will suffer !

Ответить
@mtlauj8038
@mtlauj8038 - 27.11.2024 03:04

In the ASEAN nations PH is a joke. This is what PH get when they choose a stupid president. like father like son. PH people can do better but b/c of Macros Jr. PH is a few years behind in developing their country. good luck to them. i hope get well soon.

Ответить
@taiwanstillisntacountry
@taiwanstillisntacountry - 27.11.2024 03:13

As brave as a nuofu-inu from scam-center Mumbai-Dharavi

Ответить
@theox73
@theox73 - 27.11.2024 03:45

marcos and his wife are drug addict. the philippines govt is so corrupt right now and millions of filipinos are suffering.

Ответить
@magnacarta740
@magnacarta740 - 27.11.2024 03:45

Stupid people voted for a corrupt evil man. Like father like son!

Ответить
@jamesteh829
@jamesteh829 - 27.11.2024 03:53

Liked Father liked son

Ответить
@jamesteh829
@jamesteh829 - 27.11.2024 03:54

Only Filipinos are fooled by Marcos and family

Ответить
@boonteoh2346
@boonteoh2346 - 27.11.2024 04:15

American lapdog, spies!! What do you expect of an inept corrupted person!! 🤷🤷

Ответить
@zen-story-teller
@zen-story-teller - 27.11.2024 04:17

So she can't even go through law and police to take him down as all have been controlled by him until she needs to hire a hitman? LOL 😂

Ответить
@RochellOfalla
@RochellOfalla - 27.11.2024 04:20

Marcos uses cocaine.

Ответить
@peterchin6759
@peterchin6759 - 27.11.2024 05:34

Is his daddy ill gotten weath still kept in the US?

Ответить
@jemboycubio5289
@jemboycubio5289 - 27.11.2024 05:58

Addict president...

Ответить
@cklee804
@cklee804 - 27.11.2024 06:05

She only talks of a revenge ...and she says in advance of those who want her dead ...
She is direct and those who are guilty are not happy and devising ways to trap her ...to say she has a plot ...so like the West ...THE PLOT IS BY THE GUILTY GROUP ...AND SHE EXPOSES THEM .

Just like the West says China 🇨🇳 is the aggressor while all the military bases are placed to surround China 🇨🇳.

This is how the Empire of Lies works and operates

Ответить
@May-cz2uo
@May-cz2uo - 27.11.2024 06:26

Silly rabbits!

Ответить
@thetruthinquirer
@thetruthinquirer - 27.11.2024 06:30

Its all in the family. You guys didn't learn you lessons. A rat is a rat. Look at what happened to his father. he is the most corrupted President and you guys got to kick him out of the country. He stashed away billions in his pockets. You have nobody to blame but yrself. Its time to teach this family a lesson, get him out or else filipinos will have the drugs curse that will make the society sick, and you will all be poor and in debt forever.

Ответить
@ckwasu2709
@ckwasu2709 - 27.11.2024 06:31

She is right... This guy is as useless American tool. He dun prioritise Pinoy life. Question is how idiotic could be Pinoy to vote him as president knowing his father's history. I'm amazed with idiocy on this planet now....

Ответить
@awen777
@awen777 - 27.11.2024 06:39

I smell US involvement?! Many of us were young when the Marcos corrupt rule existed. It was considered unstoppable.

Ответить
@RobertNg-o7r
@RobertNg-o7r - 27.11.2024 07:19

MARCOS JR WILL LEAVE IT TO CIA TO DISPOSE OF DUTERTE. THEY HAVE PAID JR HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS TO LOSE TO DUTERTE

Ответить
@bayernvoeller
@bayernvoeller - 27.11.2024 07:43

Marcos Jr is working for united states !

Ответить
@aryanhan506
@aryanhan506 - 27.11.2024 08:49

A Stoopig, failure academically, low iq pres. sad

Ответить
@danstenis660
@danstenis660 - 27.11.2024 09:21

Bongbong Marcos is a lapdog of the USA. Why would the people of the Philippines let him continue as President? He is selling his people to the USA as cannon fodders. He wants the Philippines to be the next Ukraine. The USA has his balls tightened by a string when they threaten to confiscate all assets stolen by his former Philippine President parent. Bongbong Marcos would rather have every Filipino men slaughtered as long as he can keep his parent's loot. The Filipino people are too ignorant and brainwashed to know any better.

Ответить
@YihTan
@YihTan - 27.11.2024 09:58

useless president

Ответить
@SchuarJavert
@SchuarJavert - 27.11.2024 11:09

The Marcos were the greatest thieves in the Philippine's history. How the Philippines chose another Marcos is beyond common sense! Nincompoops galore!

Ответить
@notpinoy
@notpinoy - 27.11.2024 11:11

Marcos is a pathological liar. It's been more than 2 years, yet he has not delivered. He's so incompetent and flagrantly corrupt. If I were you, I will take every word that this man utters with a grain of salt.

Ответить
@Gilbert-x5i
@Gilbert-x5i - 27.11.2024 11:19

One is pro us the other is pro China.

Ответить
@philharrison2991
@philharrison2991 - 27.11.2024 11:31

WESTERN COLONIALISM IS EXPLOITIVE TERRORISM.

WESTERN COLONIAL INVASION, PACIFICATION, EXPLOITATIONS AND GENOCIDE OF AFRICA, INDIA, ASIA AND THE AMERICAS.

Isreal genocide of the Palestinians supported by the British Colonial Balfour Declaration.


French soldiers committed the massacre in My Trach village, My Thuy commu Thuy District, Quang Binh Province, Vietnam from 5 am to 8 am on November 29, 1947. The French Army burned 326 houses and murdered more than half of the village's residents. French soldiers raped many women and children before murdering them.

US soldiers raped and mutilated innocent Vietnamese woman and children, then thrown into a ditch and executed with assault rifles.


Diwa is only 11 years old. She is one of the thousands of victims of a crime that is hardly reported on in Europe but which is causing havoc in the Philippines. She was raped by her parents, live on the internet, to satisfy the desires of foreign paedophiles who paid for the spectacle of her rape, giving instructions from a distance.


"I've witnessed from FBI files an old American man raping a child as a sex tourist in Cambodia" - Ashton Kutcher

STOP WESTERNERS FROM USING ASIA AS A PEADOPHILES TOURIST PARADISE! DRUGGING AND RAPING ASIAN CHILDREN!


The Philippine-American War pitted one time allies in the overthrow of Spain against each other. Spain negotiated a separate peace with the United States in the Treaty of Paris, ceding colonial rule of the Philippine Islands to the Americans rather than granting the Filipinos independence. The American government accepted this new imperial role, and set about subduing any Filipinos who resisted. In this scene, the city of Iloilo is captured from Filipino forces by Americans led by Brigadier General Marcus Miller, with no loss of American lives. (Diorama in the Ayala Museum, Makati, Philippines, 2018.)

Waging the American War

How did the Americans justify their takeover of the Philippines? Are you convinced by this argument?

In your opinion, did American conduct during the war match these justifications? Why or why not?

How did the American military attempt to counter rumors of their brutality?

Annexation of the Philippines as a colony of the United States was often justified by those in the U.S. government and media on moral and racial grounds. The U.S. was simply doing its duty as an advanced, Western nation, spreading civilization, democracy, and capitalism to primitive Asians who enjoyed none of these things and were too simple to be trusted with self-government. Historian Stuart Creighton Miller writes that in this view, “Americans altruistically went to war with Spain to liberate Cubans, Puerto Ricans, and Filipinos from their tyrannical yoke. If they lingered on too long in the Philippines, it was to protect the Filipinos from European predators waiting in the wings for an American withdrawal and to tutor them in American-style democracy.” Implicit in this attitude were notions of racial superiority and the inherent superiority of white America over primitive people of color.


The ugly reality of Americans colonial mission was laid bare by Dean Worcester, an American colonial official, who wrote in his memoirs that the Filipinos were “treacherous, arrogant, stupid and vindictive, impervious to gratitude, incapable of recognizing obligations. Centuries of barbarism have made them cunning and dishonest. We cannot safely treat them as equals, for the simple and sufficient reason that they could not understand it. They do not know the meaning of justice and good faith. They do not know the difference between liberty and license…. These Filipinos must be taught obedience and be forced to observe, even if they cannot comprehend, the practices of civilization.


On February 11, 1899—only one week after the first shots of the war were fired—American naval forces destroyed the city of Iloilo with bombardment by the USS Petrel and the USS Baltimore. The city was then captured by ground forces led by Brigadier General Marcus Miller, with no loss of American lives.


Months later, after finally securing Manila from Filipino control, American forces moved northwards, engaging in combat at the brigade and battalion level in pursuit of the fleeing insurgent forces and their commanders. In response to the use of guerilla warfare tactics by Filipino forces beginning in September 1899, American military strategy shifted to a suppression footing. Tactics became focused on the control of key areas with internment and segregation of the civilian population in “zones of protection” from the guerrilla population (foreshadowing the Strategic Hamlet Program that would be utilized decades later, during the Vietnam War). Due to unsanitary conditions, many of the interned civilians died from dysentery.


General Otis gained notoriety for some of his actions in the Philippines. Although multiple orders were given to Otis from Washington to avoid military conflict, he did very little to prevent the breakout of war. Otis refused to accept anything but unconditional surrender from the Philippine Army. He often made major military decisions without first consulting leadership in Washington. He acted aggressively in dealing with the Filipinos under the assumption that their resistance would collapse quickly. 


A member of the American colonial government offered an alternative theory on what Bell was achieving, noting in his official report that far from breaking the spirit of the Filipino people, the blanket policy of violence and destruction was:


… sowing the seeds for a perpetual revolution. If these things need be done, they had best be done by native troops so that the people of the U.S.. will not be credited therewith.


Otis also played a large role in suppressing information about American military tactics from the media. When letters describing American atrocities reached the American media, the War Department became involved and demanded that Otis investigate their authenticity. Each press clipping was forwarded to the original writer’s commanding officer, who would then convince or force the soldier to write a retraction of the original statements.


Meanwhile, Otis claimed that Filipino insurgents tortured American prisoners in “fiendish fashion.” During the closing months of 1899, Aguinaldo attempted to counter Otis’ account by suggesting that neutral parties—foreign journalists or representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross—inspect his military operations. Otis refused, but Aguinaldo managed to smuggle four reporters—two English, one Canadian, and one Japanese—into the Philippines. The correspondents returned to Manila to report that American captives were “treated more like guests than prisoners,” were “fed the best that the country affords, and everything is done to gain their favor.” The story went on to say that American prisoners were offered commissions in the Filipino army and that three had accepted. The four reporters were expelled from the Philippines as soon as their stories were printed.


U.S. Navy Lieutenant J.C. Gilmore, whose release was forced by American cavalry pursuing Aguinaldo into the mountains, insisted that he had received “considerable treatment” and that he was no more starved than were his captors. Otis responded to publication of two articles concerning this by ordering the “capture” of the two authors, and that they be “investigated,” therefore questioning their loyalty.


When F.A. Blake of the International Committee of the Red Cross arrived at Aguinaldo’s request, Otis kept him confined to Manila, where Otis’ staff explained all of the violations of international humanitarian law perpetrated by Filipino soldiers. Blake managed to slip away from an escort and venture into the field. Blake never made it past American lines, but even within American lines he saw burned out villages and “horribly mutilated bodies, with stomachs slit open and occasionally decapitated.” Blake waited to return to San Francisco, where he told one reporter that “American soldiers are determined to kill every Filipino in sight.”


H.L. Wells, a staunch imperialist writing in the New York Evening Post, excused the troubling American racial theories that contributed to the often callous violence that characterized the Philippine-American War “There is no question that our men do ‘shoot niggers’ somewhat in the sporting spirit, but that is because war and their environments have rubbed off the thin veneer of civilization…Undoubtedly, they do not regard the shooting of Filipinos just as they would the shooting of white troops. This is partly because they are “only niggers,” and partly because they despise them for their treacherous servility…The soldiers feel they are fighting with savages, not with soldiers.”

Ответить
@SaSatch_Chelyen29
@SaSatch_Chelyen29 - 27.11.2024 12:46

He wants Papa money 😊

Ответить
@vegamoonlight
@vegamoonlight - 27.11.2024 15:37

Narcos pivoting from China to the US turned the PH into a banana republic. Many of his supporters warned him about the US but he is a stubborn idiot whose agenda is to only retrieve his 'family's gold' and not sincerely serving his country.

Ответить
@Jimmy-mx4cc
@Jimmy-mx4cc - 28.11.2024 08:07

She's the hounist person

Ответить
@teatree6228
@teatree6228 - 28.11.2024 08:15

The bong bong wants his daddy s frozen asset in USA- after all he is a US citizen

Ответить
@teatree6228
@teatree6228 - 28.11.2024 08:16

Sara had to declare in public to protect herself, just if anything happens to her, everyone knows who is responsible

Ответить
@teatree6228
@teatree6228 - 28.11.2024 08:18

Sara had to declare in public to protect herself, just if anything happens to her, everyone knows who is responsible

Ответить
@yenriver5255
@yenriver5255 - 28.11.2024 09:01

2 question...why did they elect him? Why did Sara join him in campaign????? If they cant fix this issues how can they fix international problem?

Ответить
@TenaciousMind-que
@TenaciousMind-que - 28.11.2024 09:26

Trolls are useless paid vermin and attack dogs of Dutertes who rely solely on government aid.

Ответить