How The Dead Sea Scrolls Reveal Changes to the Bible

Even time wasn’t standardised until the invention of the railway (need for timetables). Each town in England (where railways were developed) had their own time. Bible standardisation doesn’t even begin until hundreds of years after Jesus and there still isn’t a standard version of the New Testament.

Herzlichen Dank für diese Aufklärung und Darstellung. Die Erkenntnisse sind nicht ganz neu. Das Gesamtzeugnis der Schriftrollen vom Toten Meer bezeugen, dass es im Laufe der Zeit Veränderungen im biblischen Text gab, was den Narrativ zerstört, dass jedes Wort in der Bibel Gottes Wort sei. Die Kommentare zeigen, dass Frommreligiöse damit nicht umgehen können und überfordert sind.

the sons of Elohim is the fallen angels who had taken position as those nation's elohim, Elohim is not a name it is just something you worship to, even YHWH is not a personal name just a call name Jewish's and Christian's Elohim revealed to Moses. Nations did worship differents god and godesses and then Israelites has YHWH as their Elohim and then YHWH wants to show who is the real Elohim among all since the rest are just fallen angels

I definitely recommend people read / listen to Michael Heiser about Elohim / gods.
It makes complete sense in an ancient middle eastern context to have lots of gods and for YHWH’s supremacy to be asserted in the Bible texts.

I, who have been all my life, looking for truth now start to have a glimpse thanks to such videos. Thank you. I start to learn how men manipulate us, inducing us to believe in pure myths.

Gods are angels sons of god

I preferred James snapps video on textual varients

Thank you so much for this work. I hope to see more. 🙏🏽

So now, either the changes were introduced in the old time or they were introduced in a relatively newer time, but in the end it is there. This can make clear how some absurd and weird rulings exist in Christianity and how certain traditions and ideas we have now were in fact ones from an older culture.

Very interesting work, well presented with great production values. See you soon.

god used for
God himself
Moses
Judges
Other beings worshipped by the nations.
All said dies that change the Bible narrative?

So happy you hit 10K man, congratulations! 🥳

Interesting, the "sons of Israel" vs "sons of god" is a major one, as it was also tied to the Enochian lore and mythos during the 2nd Temple period about lesser divinities. When taking into consideration the Ugaritic texts and cultures of the Levant, it is traces of older polytheistic elements in Canaanite religions.

Already at the beginning you made two mistakes.

The scrolls were made from 175 BCE (more or less), not by the "essenes", who were nothing but a legend cooked up by josephus, but rather by the exiled temple priests, the TṢədokìm (צדוקים), who - having lost their (rightful by birth, according to them) priestly positions - first to the Pro-Hellenistic sect, later to the kings of the house of hašmonày, and, eventually, to the pərušìm (פרושים) - had decided to preserve their version of the bible, as well as their writings against their rivals.

You should read the Books by, and listen to, Prof. Raĥél ("Rachel") Eli`òr - she explains it all.

Precisely as I expected: the Tanakh canon was something that developed over time, and books jumped in and out and were reedited to fit the theology of a certain scribe.

Dr. Kipp on Tablets and Temples? What is this, a crossover episode?

Latin texts became the norm in the West, but the Septuagint remained the norm in the East, and it still is today.

Please do the same about the Quran, how it was changed and falsified.

A whole system of angelology developed to explain this away over time.

so it's stolen from another people, and made to look like their own and favour their kind... what's new

The end of this video ignores the obvious fact that there was, indeed, a singular autograph version of Isiah. We do not have that. We have copies made by various communities over thousands of years.

But at some point, there was just one document: the autograph. It would be the correct version all others corrupted from.

Actually your first example aligns perfectly with a break-off sect that doesn't want to be aligned with Israel

@KevinPeterTobiason

The extremely misogynistic Abrahamic religions are the most hateful and violent Parental Deity religions in the world. Because they are all Supremacist Religions. They alone are right and everyone else is wrong. Even the other Abrahamic religions.

They all hate each other even though they all allegedly worship the exact same Parental Deity Yahweh. Who is a psychotic genocidal asshole with the emotional maturity of a five year old Autistic child from Hell. 

The Jews hate the Christians and the Jews hate the Muslims. The Muslim’s hate the Jews and the Muslim’s hate the Christians. And the Christian’s hate the Muslims and the Christian’s hate the Jews. Just think of the Holocaust. They all treat each other like garbage. They all hate each other and are the most hateful and violent Parental Deity religions in the world. 

Which is why the Abrahamic religions are a poison to the rest of the world. In the future the Abrahamic Age will be remembered as the Age Of Delusion. And what is currently going on in the Abrahamic so-called Holy Land. Is just a morally disgusting abomination against all of the Gods. Especially all of the Goddesses whom the Jews exterminated. 

Just like Palestinian children and their Mothers.💙

Assuming something:
Sons of el meant children of god jewish or gentile (see galatians 3). Note that it used el for god (singular no trinity). If the Catholic church bought up the dead sea scrolls can we trust what they gave us did not get tampered ?

Regardless of how you feel about the Bible, to say "one scribe" made changes and that changed the Bible from then on is a bit of a stretch.

FROM ESSENCE,,,,

DEAD SEA SCROLLS,,, : JESUS IS NOT GOD,,,,

One message one God❤

Great exegesis Ocker

Great job, you're killing it with this new series.

the "dead sea scrolls", just like the "Septuagint", are a modern fabrication

a fake "older manuscripts" myth

just like

other fake "older Greek Septuagint" than Hebrew bible myth

For me changes to really important details like tge term gods can completely change the meaning so i will consider one that ront change the whole sentence or add a whole new sentence and especially talking about not forgiving.

You are so full of crap dude.

So in other words they have all changed bits and pieces to suit the narrative just like the Vatican leaving out so many books. I thought it was always said that no one was supposed to change what was in the bible, control and power of the people.

Elohim were spiritual beings, including angels and demons, not polytheistic gods.

Hey man your videos on old bible videos are fascinating. I'd really like if you elaborated on the Samaritan Pentateuch as well

What would they say if they were translated in English

A lot of the work in this field seems like trying to find textual variants that have some preservation within the physical evidence of the manuscripts and fragments we have collected over the years. However, isn't there something to be said about textual varients that we have no physical evidence for but might be implied by the near-universally accepted hypotheses/theories such as the Deuteronomistic History altering the core stories in Judges to fit a more pro-YHWH anti-Ba'al narative? The story of Gideon/Jerub-Ba'al and the continuation with Abimelech interests me for this reason.

Well it's obviously a original Hebrew that created all these texts.. so to say it not an original text is false .. the masoretic text is the only translation that is not similar to the rest of the texts it's an intentional misinterpreted text

Because sons of God are gods created beings in Gods likeness and image of God aka humans. The Dead Sea scrolls support The Catholic and Orthodox theology of man being made to share in the divine nature of God through Union with God through Christ.

The Dead Sea scrolls are not speaking of Polytheism.

Luke 3:38 (NKJV)
38 the son of Enosh, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.
Adam is called the son of God in Luke. So all Adam’s descendants are likewise sons of God. 

When God made man 
Genesis 1:26 (NKJV)
26 Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”

Therefore Man is made after the God-Kind. So whenever you see a word referring to people in scripture, it can be translated the sons of God. Scribes seeing this in ignorance probably changed it from sons of God in their frightful ignorance that it was blasphemous.



Another example of all people, both males and females, are sons of God in the Bible is Psalms 82:6-7 (NKJV)
6 I said, “You are gods,
And all of you are children of the Most High.
7 But you shall die like men,
And fall like one of the princes.”

The Septuagent was first, everybody knows Hebrew was a dead language.

There is no ancient god Yahweh. There is the Living God Yehovah as found in the meanings of many, many Hebrew names, including the true meaning of our Lord's full Hebrew Name (Yehoshua / Yeshua = "Yehovah will save"). And a correct alternate would be Yahh as in HalleluYah / HalleluJah!

Deut 32.8-9 nrsvue Elyon portion Iand, he set ppl acc. To number of gods, his portion was his ppl through Jacob.

Here d sea scroIls shows the pauIy-theism edited out of the 0ld T.

It is said El is a cheif god of canon adapted by hebrews, wed to ashra with kids named anaat, baal, yam, dagon, mot.

Nrsvue & d sea scroIls says Deut 32.43 says worship him you gods.

6.00

Isiah 2.9 to 11 in masoretics added 2nd hald verse 9, the verse 10, its nit in d sea scroIls.

Was it added in hosmany revoIt or during rome when yahud was hiding.

8.00 -

Isiah 34 between 35, has added Iines.
This shows scribal errors went main stream.

Dss shows there are many extra paragraphs in exodus and numbers missing in masoretics.

They agree more with samaritans.