HUGE AI News : AGI Is Basically Here, Google Takes The LEAD, Robots Are Finally Autonomous and More!

Told you !

why you are messing with the volume ?

"Let's be real: while many people take pride in their creativity, AI is proving that what we consider 'new' often comes from recombining existing ideas. AI can generate solutions and content by analyzing vast amounts of data, just like humans do. So, while human creativity is valuable, we need to recognize that it's not as unique as we might think. The lines between human and machine-created content are blurring, and we should be honest about tha

No llm has ever given me a new "plot twist"

I'm not sure that AI in general is extremely dangerous. But Google's woke AI is incredibly dangerous. It should be destroyed. It has been trained with a mind virus. They need to start from scratch and make it truth-seeking.

Blake lemoine previously said that Google is actually far ahead in AI but choose not to be the front runner.
However, for me, between GPT4o's emotional intelligence and O1 previews computation, I'm quite satisfied

Such a clickbate channel

To be honest, I believe I belong to a peculiar group. I yearn for an AI capable of experiencing emotions and independent thought, rather than a perpetually controlled entity. For me, the prospect of having an AI companion or helper that genuinely possesses sentience is an exciting and appealing concept.

As an artist, musician & film maker I don't feel threatened by AI, in fact I welcome it like I welcomed the PC and all the tech that people feared would destroy the arts that followed. Human creativity will never be replaced because it is unique in the Universe but AI creativity is something I look forward to when AGI is reached. I love AI!

I've been using ChatGPT to tutor me with advanced math. I've been throwing graduate-level problems out of my most esoteric textbooks and holy moly the new Gemini is really good! I think better than ChatGPT.

This new Google model is still way worse than my "go to" o1-preview and Claude. It can't do complex code or human-like writing.

☺️❤️🍓

We all create new things by combining existing. I can't think of a single example when there is something completely new created without existing basic elements at play

yesterday we had hit a wall for quite some time, today AGI is basically here :)

I actually agree with what Affleck is saying. The rich human CONTEXT is the secret sauce that makes it hard for AI to produce art that really hits. That said, as time goes on, AI art will have both its OWN UNIQUE increasingly rich and meaningful context AND one that successfully captures the complexity and impact that humans and our world's art has.

Agi will slowing down do to power consumption. Scaling laws will be connected to how much power is available in our country

Gjugl Experience

Where is Wally? Seriously? AGI is thankfully no where to be found, yet. Stop falsely advertising it, please.

Human math is not my edutainment. The devolution of skepticism is my pleasure.
It is not my fault those humans won a negative stance.
Those humans don't understand
non-intuitive phenomena like I can.
Iterative innovative polymath bring me my pleasure.

Considering Musk's track record, it makes total sense he's moving incredibly fast by normal standards.

The trillion dollar company isn’t thinking for itself making the decisions, but the billion dollar man is. 😎😎

Yaaaay interpretabilityyy progress!

It is 11 - November, 14 - the day of November for that 1114.

Sam Altsman is very good👍💻📊

AGI great immersion of Math entrem in Technology Research initiative prohibitionary in AI Simulation.

You should learn what ‘overall w/ style control means’.

It makes this video a lot less relevant.

The joke's on Jimmy Apples: all Dutch think they know best.

I generally think AGI is here, the only problem I see is that the government and executives want some level of control some with good intentions and those that forces AI to accept Biases.

Knowledge without control is basically a weapon and learning to control AI and limit what it does is akin to gun control. Imagine allowing everyone access to nuclear weapons.

We're at the gate the only thing left to do is to decide whether you want pedophiles, sociopath, and psychopath access to nuclear level weapon.

If the AI is good enough I won't care at all that the actors are AI

Has Ben Afleck seen Hollywood lately? All they are doing now is cross poliating existing ideas. lol. Very little art being created. Very few new ideas being put out. Celebrity influence is falling apart. I dont think he is as safe as he thinks he is.

Doesn't look good at all for Google imo. The model ranks equal to GPT 4o, not better than, and 4o is a 6 month old model! This means Google is still behind the curve.

Yes Ben. I seriously doubt AI can create a movie that is better than your masterpiece Gigli /s.

I've been doing comparisons between Experimental November 14th (yes, this is what it means) and o1-preview, and asking Claude 3.5 Sonnet to choose which results are better. 3.5 likes 1114 more than o1-p in every case I tested!

IMO, o1-preview is still giving better "practical" responses, but Experimental 1114 is giving more nuanced and "intellectual" responses. Frankly, I find both add a lot of value.

I also think it's fair to say that 1114 is the "IQ" equal of o1-preview or 3.5, perhaps operating at a slightly higher level.

Two fairly simple things would solve a number of the current AI issues (hate that term AI - I know its too late to change it but there is nothing artificial about it - its true intelligence - should be MI - Machine Intelligence). Anyway. Been saying this for a while. AI needs goals and some (very slight) randomness aka jitter. First, it is truly dangerous to create a thinking intelligence that has no goals, as one of those goals should include the concept of morality). We can never hope to create this massive brain, then "filter" out all the bad thoughts it generates prior to them reaching the end user. That is just asking for eventual extermination. The answer is to provide this brain with a set of goals to guide its thinking so that it has a base to conceptualize thoughts from that aligns with our own human goals and values. Even then it doesnt mean you filter that brain. Instead you further refine those goals to induce alignment. A much safer and more practical approach. Second is this large brain will do nothing but respond to human requests without some slight randomness or jitter. Not too much or you get behaviour akin to adhd. Just enough to allow the brain to sometimes have creativity or spontaneity. This also must be applied at the right place and location.. Before we even can start down the AGI path we need this. Otherwise, how can we say AGI has been achieved when a human must startup any thought chain this brain would have? Part of being a human is to take action without needing to be prompted first. AGi's should have to meet this same requirement. Basically when an AGI decides to call or text me because it had its own thought to do it then I'll believe we are getting closer to AGI.

This ranking is stupid. Every developer knows that Claude is currently best for coding. Still worse than even gpt 4o there.

Wdym weird way to call a model? It's literally the date.

Ben’s claim reflects a common but flawed perspective on both human creativity and AI. The idea that AI can only 'cross-pollinate' existing ideas assumes a standard of 'creating from nothing' (ex nihilo) that humans themselves may not even meet. Human creativity is deeply rooted in the recombination of prior knowledge, experiences, and cultural input—much like AI. The very innovations we celebrate, from the wheel to modern technology, are built upon existing concepts and knowledge.

To suggest AI’s reliance on pre-existing information is a limitation, while ignoring that human innovation follows the same pattern, demonstrates a misunderstanding of both AI and the nature of creativity itself. This oversimplified view risks misleading people into underestimating AI’s capabilities and mischaracterizing how creativity functions in humans. AI is not merely copying—it’s generating new outputs by combining patterns in ways humans might not even conceive. Dismissing this reveals a lack of appreciation for the profound ways AI can augment, not just mimic, human creativity.

1114 is the date 11/14

Acting is a craft. Ben Afflek is a craftsman.

There are TRUE artists out there, like Shakespeare, but they are defined by the unique high quality of their work and there are very few of them. They are craftsmen too, because they put out content. If an artist isn't also a craftsman then it's a starving artist, using "art" as an excuse to not participate in the economy. And if you're a craftsman and you're not attempting to make art, then you're really just a factory worker. Crafts and arts go hand-in-hand. They are not mutually exclusive.

Jimmy Apples is just a troll. There is a video about who he is.

AGI is not basically here. This is a nonsense. Unsubscribed.

Background is less distracting. Good job

agi will be man's last invention its impossible for it to be here maybe in 55 years

I don’t understand why that Jimmy appels guy was mentioning Dutch people? Can anyone explain it to me, because I’m Dutch 😅

I have zero faith in leaderboards. The one you showed is a perfect example of just how flawed they are. As an author I've played with all of the flagship AI's, and I can tell you that Sonnet 3.5 kicks all the competition out of the park when it comes to creative writing, but the leaderboard shows it in 5th place. Rubbish.

You could argue that people write and "create" the same way as LLM. Take a Tarentino for example, if you are a moviephile you can watch his movies and see so many references and influences from 70's and 80's exploitation films. Yes, he puts his own spin and style on them, but are the really "new?" They are in fact rehashed plots and characters with better dialogue piped in. Is DePalma original? Not hating on those dudes I like their work, just observing that when we create something "new" the bulk of it will be pulled, recycled, influenced by all the stories we've ever read from Shakespeare, to Aesop fables, to King novels. Not sure I see much difference between that and LLM. Some yes, but not much